NotThePars Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 Depends on the interests of the individual person. Whether they're white or not is irrelevant.The post you’re responding to contains a quote about ‘white racial self interest’. So clearly in that context it is important that they are white. Do you think white people need to consider their own racial self interest? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted November 13, 2020 Share Posted November 13, 2020 Depends on the interests of the individual person. Whether they're white or not is irrelevant.But you saying "White people protecting their own self interests isn't racism though" contradicts that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Posted November 14, 2020 Share Posted November 14, 2020 6 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: But you saying "White people protecting their own self interests isn't racism though" contradicts that. Why? Is a white person not allowed to protect their own individual self interests? Seems a bit racist to me. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 We all acknowledge that we live in the cruelest timeline and the dumbest one but sometimes I don’t think we acknowledge that it’s also the most childish. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted November 16, 2020 Share Posted November 16, 2020 There are reports that a newly elected official from the left slate is being investigated for a tweet describing Israel as an Apartheid state. I'll be surprised if it goes any further though as it's much harder to smear people in a forum where they have legal representation as the ECHR found out. It's all about stifling criticisms. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunning1874 Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 13 hours ago, Detournement said: There are reports that a newly elected official from the left slate is being investigated for a tweet describing Israel as an Apartheid state. I'll be surprised if it goes any further though as it's much harder to smear people in a forum where they have legal representation as the ECHR found out. It's all about stifling criticisms. Yes, Gemma Bolton, who tweeted years ago "If I run the risk of getting suspended for calling Israel an apartheid state then so be it" Remember when it was actually accepted that conflating any criticism of Israel with antisemitism was itself antisemitic? Good thing that, of course, there is nothing factional about these investigations. Imagine for example it was revealed that in their younger days Jeremy Corbyn, John McConnell or Diane Abbot had been the editor of a magazine which ran an article arguing it was necessary for the PLO to arm themselves "to prevent holocaust at the hands of either the Zionists or reactionary Arabs." Invoking the holocaust in criticism of Israeli policy is antisemitic, as per the IHRA definition which was also formally adopted by the Labour Party. Had any of them been in that position then despite only being an editor of the magazine rather than author of the article there's little doubt they'd have been expelled from the Labour Party - talking about Zionists committing a holocaust is highly offensive and unacceptable. Good thing then that it wasn't Corbyn, McConnell, Abbot, Long-Bailey or anyone else on the left who were editors of a magazine which carried such an article. No, in reality that was a certain... Keir Starmer. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Given that the UN concluded that the Sabra and Shatila massacres were a form of genocide i'll give SKSQC a pass on this one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gannonball Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 (edited) Corbyn Reinstated, questionable as a leader but a man of integrity for me. Happy to hear this. Edited November 17, 2020 by gannonball 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 15 minutes ago, gannonball said: Corbyn Reinstated, questionable as a leader but a man of integrity for me. Happy to hear this. Certain cults will be fuming by this. How very pleasing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Not a fan of Corby but this is the right decision - should never have been suspended - clearly a politically motivated witch-hunt. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Certain cults will be fuming by this. How very pleasing. C***s surely? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 (edited) Maybe they should check that any rules have been broken before they shoot their load the stupid c***s Edited November 17, 2020 by NotThePars 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Angelo Barksdale Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 *takes massive toke and opens up twitter. HWFG 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Angelo Barksdale Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 Can't believe Labour have let Jezza back in after he spraypainted this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 5 minutes ago, Henderson to deliver ..... said: Can't believe Labour have let Jezza back in after he spraypainted this. Love this logic. Everyone who hates Corbyn joined the paratroopers and shot pics of Jez. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 The cringe is real. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrewDon Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 As I said before the right of Labour are only interested in media smears. Any confrontation that involves legal representation they will run a mile from. Starmer's response shows exactly what he is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted November 17, 2020 Share Posted November 17, 2020 He’s absolutely shat it from a legal challenge. Forensic. Competent. Inspirational. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunning1874 Posted November 18, 2020 Share Posted November 18, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.