Jump to content

Billy Gilmour


Kuro

Recommended Posts

Callum McGregor is good because he covers the forward runs of Andy Robertson and Kieran Tierney.  Would Billy Gilmour do that? or would Scott McTominay be pushed to the left side of midfield and Billy Gilmour continuing on the right? Assuming we play 2 holding midfielders at home to Israel.

Decisions, decisions...

Edited by 2426255
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bairnardo said:

Surely Scott McTominay plays before Calum McGregor on account of being better than him in every department, by quite a way?

Not for me. Our 3 best performances in recent times have been Serbia away, England away, and Austria away. In all 3 McGregor has played in a double pivot (once with Jack, twice with Gilmour). McTominay is clearly the better player, but I'd argue we're a better team with McGregor in there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bairnardo said:

Surely Scott McTominay plays before Calum McGregor on account of being better than him in every department, by quite a way?

I don’t know why but McTominay has been largely anonymous for Scotland when asked to play a holding midfield role. He’ll hopefully have more license to drive forward with Gilmour beside him but there’s a credible argument for McGregor playing instead in certain games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Coooombe said:

Not for me. Our 3 best performances in recent times have been Serbia away, England away, and Austria away. In all 3 McGregor has played in a double pivot (once with Jack, twice with Gilmour). McTominay is clearly the better player, but I'd argue we're a better team with McGregor in there. 

Not sure how it can be judged we're a better team with Gilmour and McGregor over Gilmour and McTominay when we haven't even paired the latter together yet in midfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, The Moonster said:

Not sure how it can be judged we're a better team with Gilmour and McGregor over Gilmour and McTominay when we haven't even paired the latter together yet in midfield. 

That's fair, and against Moldova and/or the Faroes I'd try them both together. For Israel I'd stick with the tried and tested though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Coooombe said:

Not for me. Our 3 best performances in recent times have been Serbia away, England away, and Austria away. In all 3 McGregor has played in a double pivot (once with Jack, twice with Gilmour). McTominay is clearly the better player, but I'd argue we're a better team with McGregor in there. 

Mctominay best attribute is box to box

Mcginn does that for us, and more 

I don't see Mctominay getting in a midfield 3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/09/2021 at 10:41, Binos said:

He can’t play on the right of one either 

 

40 minutes ago, Binos said:

I don't see Mctominay getting in a midfield 3

So Scott McTominay wouldn't get in defence or midfield for you then unless we have four centre mids in there.

Edited by 2426255
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like I've said this several times but we have only played one sitting midfielder in our last 4 home games: Gilmour v Moldova, McGregor v Croatia, McTominay v Czech Republic and McLean v Faroes. So what makes everyone so sure we will play two against Israel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like I've said this several times but we have only played one sitting midfielder in our last 4 home games: Gilmour v Moldova, McGregor v Croatia, McTominay v Czech Republic and McLean v Faroes. So what makes everyone so sure we will play two against Israel.
I think we would've played two against Croatia had Gilmour not caught Covid but I could be wrong.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 2426255 said:

 

So Scott McTominay wouldn't get in defence or midfield for you then unless we have four centre mids in there.

We should be ditching 3 centre halves and 2 upfront in favour of getting more players in midfield which is our strongest area

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Pie Of The Month said:

If Norwich's graphic is accurate then should be interesting to see him further forward in a 3-5-2/5-3-2 with Rupp as the holding midfielder.

 

E_03NVQVkAk8IZq?format=jpg&name=large

Is there any persuading of gunn as well 

Seeing as we're in need of a keeper or two

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, accies1874 said:
2 hours ago, 2426255 said:
I feel like I've said this several times but we have only played one sitting midfielder in our last 4 home games: Gilmour v Moldova, McGregor v Croatia, McTominay v Czech Republic and McLean v Faroes. So what makes everyone so sure we will play two against Israel.

I think we would've played two against Croatia had Gilmour not caught Covid but I could be wrong.

We could've still played two in there. A few people said Fleck was in the squad for a reason or McTominay & McGregor could have played it with Hendry in the back three.

Steve Clarke chose to play one sitter on purpose in my view, not because he was forced into it through Gilmours absence and there is reasonable evidence to suggest he might do the same at home to Israel.

Edited by 2426255
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...