sjc Posted October 25, 2019 Author Share Posted October 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, MONKMAN said: Were they a direct result from fire? Fire can be a cause of a type of failure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derry Alli Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Oh, we're now attempting at moving goalposts since it's been proven bullshit? I see. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 25, 2019 Author Share Posted October 25, 2019 Just now, dorlomin said: https://www.sst.net/heated-metal-weaker/ Yes. Heat causes steel to buckle. The mode of failure would be overturn at the point of failure not total collapse. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 25, 2019 Author Share Posted October 25, 2019 Just now, Dele said: Oh, we're now attempting at moving goalposts since it's been proven bullshit? I see. Not at all. Overturn at the point of buckle would be the expected failure. Not total collapse through the path of most resistance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Just now, sjc said: Yes. Heat causes steel to buckle. Not the only thing that appears buckled round here. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MONKMAN Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 4 minutes ago, sjc said: Fire can be a cause of a type of failure. A simple yes would have been sufficient. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dorlomin Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 I think SJC has cracked this code 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 25, 2019 Author Share Posted October 25, 2019 Just now, MONKMAN said: A simple yes would have been sufficient. You do understand the difference between cause of failure and type of failure? So, yes there has been structural steel buildings that have fallen due to fire but not by the same mode of failure. I.e total collapse through the point of most resistance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmouth Strikes Again Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 28 minutes ago, MixuFixit said: I believe the official 9/11 story 23 minutes ago, Rugster said: So do I. Disagreeing with Bigmouth is by default the correct position to take. Oh dearie me. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shandon Par Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 The earth is flat. Do some research. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ2 Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Tbf, if a big f**k off plane smashed in to my side I wouldn’t collapse. I’m not deeman or bairnardo. So 9/11 is therefore shite imo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullerene Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 58 minutes ago, sjc said: It was used by the US Government as rallying call to war. "Remember the Maine" I thought the Alamo was in Texas 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 I'm sure The Bilderberg Group was a made up conspiracy when I was young. Then at some point around the early to mid 00s it was a normal thing that always happened and it was getting reported on the news every year. They probably got the idea for their gaslighting from Father Ted kicking Bishop Brennan in the arse in 1998. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MONKMAN Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 1 hour ago, sjc said: So, yes there has been structural steel buildings that have fallen due to fire. My work here is done. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 1 hour ago, Fullerene said: Were there lots of steel buildings in 1666? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjc Posted October 25, 2019 Author Share Posted October 25, 2019 4 minutes ago, MONKMAN said: My work here is done. No it isn't. Cause of failure - yes. The mode of failure defies all engineering logic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigmouth Strikes Again Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 Is it possible for a plane made of aluminium to cut clean through the outer steel frame of the building and also the inner steel frame? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Man Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 44 minutes ago, NJ2 said: Tbf, if a big f**k off plane smashed in to my side I wouldn’t collapse. I’m not deeman or bairnardo. So 9/11 is therefore shite imo. Get my fucking username capitalised the next time you disrepectful, plane deflecting b*****d. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 1 minute ago, throbber said: That said 9/11 was a definite inside job. Just now, MixuFixit said: It was on telly and everything Exactly, I definitely saw the planes on the outside. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted October 25, 2019 Share Posted October 25, 2019 1 hour ago, sjc said: What would I know, I'm only a qualified structural engineer...... Exactly! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.