Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

We have had a terrible death rate with comparable nations and the worst economic hit of the four UK nations, which itself is the worst in the G7.
I don't really know how else it can be explained.
How do you control death rate when we're not in control of borders? If we had the ability to shut international borders, and the English border in March then aye, we'd have fuxked it. But we didn't and don't. Yet.

They're not blameless by any means, very few Govts are, but it's not a "complete disaster" as they weren't in complete control of the response.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, UsedToGoToCentralPark said:

Here's a relative comparison for you. 20210203_163943.jpg

It's not relative though is it? You have a list of fully independent countries (and Palestine that is basically stateless) completely pointless and infact the most outspoken advisors, in public anyway, promotes New Zealand style lockdown initially that would have kept deaths low. Until we are independent and have full control of our borders and economic policy it's impossible to compare Scotland with countries that have access to both of those things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Todd_is_God said:

The Brexiteer using "we'll" as if his senile thoughts are shared by the majority of the SNP membership 😂😂

Silly auld p***k needs to get off his high horse.

1 hour ago, Burnieman said:
2 hours ago, 8MileBU said:
Pro-independence but anti-SNP. The pandemic has become nothing short of a shameless power/ego trip for them now. 

That's self defeating if you truly want Independence.

Except it isn’t and this is the same point that silly auld c**t Danger missed. A fresh new batch amongst the SNP might shake things up for the better. Wanting independence and being far from sold on the current SNP/SG are two entirely different things. 

Edited by 8MileBU
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, 101 said:

It's not relative though is it? You have a list of fully independent countries (and Palestine that is basically stateless) completely pointless and infact the most outspoken advisors, in public anyway, promotes New Zealand style lockdown initially that would have kept deaths low. Until we are independent and have full control of our borders and economic policy it's impossible to compare Scotland with countries that have access to both of those things.

Was it border policy that forced the SG to fire Covid patients into care homes, reopen schools with no credible infection control measures or allow the complete disaster of putting university students into dorms, for physical lessons that never took place anyway? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, virginton said:

Was it border policy that forced the SG to fire Covid patients into care homes, reopen schools with no credible infection control measures or allow the complete disaster of putting university students into dorms, for physical lessons that never took place anyway? 

No it was Jason Leitch and hopefully he’ll be found criminally responsible for it. Everything bad was him and Devi. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what used to be a useful place for info and differing views,  this thread has just turned into major bed wetting from the "Main Players™" over policy announcements that haven't even happened yet. 

Do I fully expect to see restrictions start to ease from March if case and hospital numbers continue on their path? Yes. 

Will this take a few months but pubs etc will be open in the late Spring early summer though with some restrictions like numbers. - Yes. 

If Vaccine numbers show effectiveness like they have in Israel in terms of transmission do I expect folk to be free to travel abroad in the summer. Yes. 

A bit like the vaccines (the 1st Feb mass roll-out pick up was known weeks ahead), there could be some real dissapointed main players™ but I'm sure theyll find something else to moan about. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, virginton said:

Was it border policy that forced the SG to fire Covid patients into care homes, reopen schools with no credible infection control measures or allow the complete disaster of putting university students into dorms, for physical lessons that never took place anyway? 

I agree those were failures of the state. But the genomic sequencing done shows that the majority of the second spike was caused by foreign holidays. 

"many cases could be traced to summer holidays and other travel abroad in July and August" COG-UK consortium.

I would then ask if we had adopted stricter border controls would the appalling bad decisions to let students go back without testing have been as bad, probably not, but it was still a stupid decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Except it isn’t and this is the same point that silly auld c**t Danger missed. A fresh new batch amongst the SNP might shake things up for the better. Wanting independence and being far from sold on the current SNP/SG are two entirely different things. 


If you want Independence, then you vote SNP. It's not rocket science.

I don't disagree that the top end of the party needs a shake up, but as far as May is concerned, it could be your last chance. They are a means to an end.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, UsedToGoToCentralPark said:
40 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:
Nothing comparable between Scotland and any of those countries.  I also very much doubt the Palestine figures.

Population is the comparison.

Love how yoons use "Scotland doing bad in the UK" as a reason why "Scotland MUST stay in the UK".  

You guys are mental.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ayrmad said:

AZ vaccine seemingly no good against SA variant,Nicola and Wee Jason will be thumbing through their 2022 calendars in the morning. 

Its not no good, its not as effective which is not the same thing

 Incidentally they're already tweaking it to alleviate the differentials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Burnieman said:
8 minutes ago, ayrmad said:
AZ vaccine seemingly no good against SA variant,Nicola and Wee Jason will be thumbing through their 2022 calendars in the morning. 

"No good" define no good.......

No protection, not peer reviewed yet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, Burnieman said:
7 minutes ago, ayrmad said:
AZ vaccine seemingly no good against SA variant,Nicola and Wee Jason will be thumbing through their 2022 calendars in the morning. 

"No good" define no good.......

Yep. No good is an interesting term for a small study where no patients died or were hospitalised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ayrmad said:

AZ vaccine seemingly no good against SA variant,Nicola and Wee Jason will be thumbing through their 2022 calendars in the morning. 

Mind calming down, it still prevents hospitalisations and deaths. Which for the moment is what we want and need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tynierose said:

Its not no good, its not as effective which is not the same thing

 Incidentally they're already tweaking it to alleviate the differentials.

I know they're tweaking it but it's not supposed to be very effective at all, I'm only going from what was being said on 5live, haven't read about it myself. 

Edited by ayrmad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 101 said:

Mind calming down, it still prevents hospitalisations and deaths. Which for the moment is what we want and need.

Why would you think I'm  not calm, I'm as happy locked away myself as I am partying with everyone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

The Oxford/AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine does not appear to offer protection against mild and moderate disease caused by the viral variant first identified in South Africa, according to a study due to be published on Monday.

Although none of the more than 2,000 patients in the study died or was hospitalised, the findings could complicate the race to roll out vaccines as new strains emerge.

In both the human trials and tests on the blood of those vaccinated, the jab showed significantly reduced efficacy against the 501Y.V2 viral variant, which is dominant in South Africa, according to the randomised, double-blind study seen by the Financial Times.

Here's a crib from the FT. Article linked below - I could view it even though I'm not subscribed. 

https://www.ft.com/content/e9bbd4fe-e6bf-4383-bfd3-be64140a3f36

Article also says Novavax and J&J less effective. Pfizer and Moderna seemingly also less effective too. 

However... No-one was hospitalised or died. If people get mild symptoms is this really a big deal? I don't think it is. 

Edited by Michael W
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...