Jump to content

Illusory Superiority on P&B


Illusory Superiority on P&B  

133 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, Hedgecutter said:

Just a very long list of "less words, more diagrams"  <_<

Would probably have been quicker to rewrite it from scratch, I tell ye.

"Fewer words..."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/07/2021 at 23:02, Hedgecutter said:

Anybody frequenting the GN Forum will have noticed the presence of certain individuals who consistently appear to know everything better than most, regardless of the subject being discussed.  For me the Coronavirus thread is a fine example of the 'Dunning-Kruger Effect' (image below for those unaware of what I mean) / 'better-than-average effect' in action.  Throw some posters some stats from the news and... well, you know the rest. 

So how prevalent is it on here?  Are most posters guilty of it?  What are the finest examples of posters walking into their own graves you remember seeing?  

Finally, out of curiosity, I've added an anonymous poll to ask a single (perhaps over-generalised) question, just to see if the majority of posters deem themselves to be better than average, which I'm led to believe is usually the case in wider society.  I've purposely avoided a middle-of-the-road cop-out answer (and chances are you wouldn't be bang on average anyway).

 

 

image.png.ddd941bc92fa0c3e72e8be1a7fcd7c7b.png

 

 

 

images (6) (3).jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find quite a lot of highly qualified people find it impossible to explain their subjects to a layman because they haven't really learnt the basics themselves. They learn what they need to get to the next step without asking why. I doubt there's anything a truly intelligent person couldn't explain in words that the average 14 year old would understand.


A lot of theorists and philosophers never learn this lesson which is why Lenin continues to be such a good writer because most of his stuff is engaging and funny.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

 


Everyone on this site imagines they’re a Kenny Powers but they’re actually a Stevie Janowski

 

Little known fact (and by little known,I mean only my wife and I know it): Steve Janowski is the spitting image of our old neighbour, Gwen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NotThePars said:

 


Poor Gwen. (And Stevie?)

 

I used to like her until she told me she battered a squirrel to death in her loft with a shovel. So f**k her: poor Stevie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to like her until she told me she battered a squirrel to death in her loft with a shovel. So f**k her: poor Stevie. 


Is she married to Jolyon Maugham (noted QC who battered a fox to death while wearing a kimono)?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

 


Is she married to Jolyon Maugham (noted QC who battered a fox to death while wearing a kimono)?

 

I just quickly read that story - what an utter c**t. 

But to answer your question, no, I don't believe he was ever romantically involved with Gwen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NotThePars said:

 


Everyone on this site imagines they’re a Kenny Powers but they’re actually a Stevie Janowski

 

No offence to anyone, and I've come across a few obvious bright sparks here, especially in the chess league, but anyone genuinely smart probably wouldn't be a regular on P&B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, GordonS said:

No offence to anyone, and I've come across a few obvious bright sparks here, especially in the chess league, but anyone genuinely smart probably wouldn't be a regular on P&B.

Why not?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dee Man said:

Why not?

In my experience few really smart people waste a lot of time on social media, and those who do generally use it to engage with folk they know on Twitter. A football message board isn't somewhere to go looking for the brightest among us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, GordonS said:

No offence to anyone, and I've come across a few obvious bright sparks here, especially in the chess league, but anyone genuinely smart probably wouldn't be a regular on P&B.

What a weird and dismissive post. There are multiple threads on here full of people displaying that they clearly know their shit on a wide variety of topics. Forum posting is the purest form of online engagement as literally anyone who destroyed their brain on Something Awful alone would know.

ETA: as if Lenin and Marx wouldn't have been forum posters as well most of their bibliography is them beefing with other writers in the exact style of niche confusing forum posting you see on here every day.

Edited by NotThePars
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, GordonS said:

In my experience few really smart people waste a lot of time on social media, and those who do generally use it to engage with folk they know on Twitter. A football message board isn't somewhere to go looking for the brightest among us.

Stuart Cosgrove posts on here and he's always saying big words so I think that may be an unequivocally fallacious argument tbh

Edited by Bert Raccoon
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GordonS said:

In my experience few really smart people waste a lot of time on social media, and those who do generally use it to engage with folk they know on Twitter. A football message board isn't somewhere to go looking for the brightest among us.

You've upped it from smart to "really smart" there. 

I think judging people on their levels of intelligence based on whether they use twitter over P&B is probably a fairly inaccurate gauge. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...