Jump to content

Russian invasion of Ukraine


Sonam

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RandomGuy. said:

Feel like a lot of folk are dreaming here.

Russia will more than survive this.

If anyone close to Putin was going to disobey or off him, they would've done so before they decided to invade Ukraine, everyone on both sides knew where it would lead.

Putin would happily challenge a no fly zone over Ukraine, NATO has already shown they're nervous about WW3 so why wouldnt he gamble on them backing down?

There is no scenario where Ukraine comes out this the same way it went in. Pretending otherwise is stupid and I hope the public announcements about "winning" from their side is just bravado and isn't what they think.

This only ends without WW3 if Russia runs out of money or Ukraine surrenders at least half their country.

A lot of sense there.  There are no good outcomes here, only a varying degree of bad.  One of the worst for me will be an arms race of F1 proportions in a world already buckled by Covid and obscene levels of economic disparity.

And be sure of one other thing; however long it takes for this horrendous conflict to reach whatever form of a resolution, there will be a queue of governments, speculators, corporations and international grifters beating a very quick path back to Moscow as Ukraine disappears into the rear view window.  Money has no morality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/03/2022 at 08:34, virginton said:

Putin is not immortal and the situation can and will change across the post-Soviet sphere when a succession takes place. All bets are off as to what type of regime will replace Putin's rule in the long term. 

Geez, not more of this unlimited sovereignty claptrap. 

Ukraine is at war with a much stronger power. 

It is not winning that war. 

Its civilian population are being killed as a by-product of urban fighting on a daily basis. 

And there is already a two-state solution. Ukraine has refused to recognise the loss of Crimea - it isn't getting that back, ever. 

That is the reality that Ukraine's leaders have to face. A ceasefire and de facto two state solution that takes a rump of the south and east is objectively much better than a war to the death, with countless opportunities for escalation. In exchange, the rest of the world can provide economic (as well as military) aid and resettlement, which would make the rump Ukraine much more secure and its people better off than it has ever been since 1991. 

And the rest of the world has an onus on getting both sides to make a serious effort for peace, because those risks of escalation are a threat to the future of humanity itself. The nationalist rhetoric of Ukraine is fucking irrelevant in that calculation. 

The issue for the rest of the world, is that this is naked, untrammeled aggression by the strong against the weak. 

As for your 'nationalist rhetoric' comment, what they want is the chance as a people to make their own choices of government ,

and what kind of place they want to live in. 

There is a tweet, and video clip current which shows the huge demonstations against Russian troops in the city of Kherson.

The commentators words with the video are.... that in very Russian speaking Kherson, this is as good as it gets for the Russian assault. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RandomGuy. said:

Feel like a lot of folk are dreaming here.

Russia will more than survive this.

If anyone close to Putin was going to disobey or off him, they would've done so before they decided to invade Ukraine, everyone on both sides knew where it would lead.

Putin would happily challenge a no fly zone over Ukraine, NATO has already shown they're nervous about WW3 so why wouldnt he gamble on them backing down?

There is no scenario where Ukraine comes out this the same way it went in. Pretending otherwise is stupid and I hope the public announcements about "winning" from their side is just bravado and isn't what they think.

This only ends without WW3 if Russia runs out of money or Ukraine surrenders at least half their country.

Guy on Radio Scotland this morning saying that only a close coterie of military types knew that Putin intended to invade.  Even the Prime Minister wasn't told.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, The DA said:

Guy on Radio Scotland this morning saying that only a close coterie of military types knew that Putin intended to invade.  Even the Prime Minister wasn't told.

And you believe that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Putin been on Russian TV again. 

Said there is no need for martial law or any other extraordinary measures and expects and hopes for it to remain thar way.

Also said that any imposing of a no-fly zone (and specifically, the means by which that is enforced) would be seen as an entry by the country/organisation enforcing it into active conflict.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:

Its completely untrue. 

The same folk who rage at Russians believing Putins spin, and calling them all morons, seem awfully willing to believe the mammoth amount of shit getting spouted about Russia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, djchapsticks said:

Putin been on Russian TV again. 

Said there is no need for martial law or any other extraordinary measures and expects and hopes for it to remain thar way.

Also said that any imposing of a no-fly zone (and specifically, the means by which that is enforced) would be seen as an entry by the country/organisation enforcing it into active conflict.

I see the requirement for a 30-foot long table is binned when surrounded by female flight attendants.

image.png.26a750581c957feb238857903ffec71f.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RandomGuy. said:

The same folk who rage at Russians believing Putins spin, and calling them all morons, seem awfully willing to believe the mammoth amount of shit getting spouted about Russia.

The intelligence agencies were briefing explicitly that he was going to do it, with that degree of certainty post iraq then theres no way its only been 5/6 people.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oaksoft said:

NATO declaring a no-fly zone automatically means WW3 because it means all NATO countries have entered the battle.

Whatever way you cut it, it's a declaration of war in all but name.

How Putin reacts would determine the length and scale of that WW3 but make no mistake, it would be WW3.

 

Agreed, I can understand the Ukrainian desperation for us to go balls deep, they have nothing to lose, other than the use of nuclear weapons. 

If we start attacking Russia, and China take Russia's side then i'm afraid the world is fucked instead of just ukraine. We won't be talking thousands of people, we'll be talking hundreds of thousands if not millions.

Trying to reason with Putin is as pointless as trying to convince a Rangers fan they weren't illegally kicked out the top flight in 2012.

Edited by red23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...