Jump to content

Energy Prices


MuckleMoo

Recommended Posts

On 02/04/2022 at 12:31, Todd_is_God said:

Aye, but he paid people to sit on the couch for 18 months so he's alright really.

He had the easiest job in government the last two years, dishing out freebies. It was always going to be a bump when the covid spending and the consequences of lockdown measures came home to roost, although with Ukraine it's a lot worse than expected.

Unsurprisingly, brand Sunak is tanking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Michael W said:

He had the easiest job in government the last two years, dishing out freebies. It was always going to be a bump when the covid spending and the consequences of lockdown measures came home to roost, although with Ukraine it's a lot worse than expected.

Unsurprisingly, brand Sunak is tanking. 

He's a smug and obscenely rich Thatcherite twat placed in politics by his father-in-law. He made his personal fortune by profiting from the financial crisis of 2008. He didn't want lockdown and he didn't want furlough. The treasury made that happen in spite of him. He's the single biggest enemy of ordinary folk in this country right now. Steve Baker is awful but a lot of people actually recognise and like Sunak. He is the deadly snake that needs decapitated.

Edited by Andre Bo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Andre Bo said:

He's a smug and obscenely rich Thatcherite twat placed in politics by his father-in-law. He made his personal fortune by profiting from the financial crisis of 2008. He didn't want lockdown and he didn't want furlough. The treasury made that happen in spite of him. He's the single biggest enemy of ordinary folk in this country right now. Steve Baker is awful but a lot of people actually recognise and like Sunak. He is the deadly snake that needs decapitated.

People liked Sunak because he was front and centre of popular policies regardless of his views on them. Most people's interests are, at best, passive where these things are concerned, after all, and no-one knew who he was either. The idea of furlough and lockdown was anaemia to the entire Tory party never mind Sunak, but it went ahead anyway out of necessity and Sunak, as a newly-appointed Chancellor, got the benefit of it. Very much right place and right time. It shows again the judgement of Boris Johnson that he let Sunak benefit from it in the way he did, but that's another matter. 

His popularity was always temporary and going to plummet when reality kicked in. Circumstances have brought this on quicker than I thought it would, granted. The Government might not have caused gas/oil/a number of other things to rise in price, but their actions on it are judged. "Ah, but Russia invaded Ukraine, you have to pay more" isn't going to wash. 

Edited by Michael W
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Michael W said:

People liked Sunak because he was front and centre of popular policies regardless of his views on them. Most people's interests are, at best, passive where these things are concerned, after all, and no-one knew who he was either. The idea of furlough and lockdown was anaemia to the entire Tory party never mind Sunak, but it went ahead anyway out of necessity and Sunak, as a newly-appointed Chancellor, got the benefit of it. Very much right place and right time. It shows again the judgement of Boris Johnson that he let Sunak benefit from it in the way he did, but that's another matter. 

His popularity was always temporary and going to plummet when reality kicked in. Circumstances have brought this on quicker than I thought it would, granted. The Government might not have caused gas/oil/a number of other things to rise in price, but their actions on it are judged. "Ah, but Russia invaded Ukraine, you have to pay more" isn't going to wash. 

Sunak actually campaigned in the cabinet against Covid restrictions and brought in some of the Great Barrington Declaration crowd to do a presentation. It is well established that Eat Out To Help Out was responsible for the second wave of Covid. He was busy grinning and serving meals without a mask for publicity. His actions around the energy crisis have prioritised protecting 'investment' (rich people) at the expense of much of the public freezing or starving. The branding job done on Sunak has been unbelievable but my hope is that will not be enough. Everything is about money for a man like him. 

Edited by Andre Bo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Andre Bo said:

Sunak actually campaigned in the cabinet against Covid restrictions and brought in some of the Great Barrington Declaration crowd to do a presentation. It is well established that Eat Out To Help Out was responsible for the second wave of Covid. He was busy grinning and serving meals without a mask for publicity. His actions around the energy crisis have prioritised protecting 'investment' (rich people) at the expense of much of the public freezing or starving. The branding job done on Sunak has been unbelievable but my hope is that will not be enough. Everything is about money for a man like him. 

The branding job works when people have money in their pockets. He was just the face of it at the start and so took the plaudits. Credit he didn't deserve? Yes. But that's politics - events can make you, but can equally sink you too. 

When people don't have money in their pocket they see through it and the Chancellor's popularity tanks, which it has. He isn't popular like he was and we haven't even seen the worst yet. Fuel prices and prices increases are biting, but it's energy that's going to be the real kicker and that one is just starring. DDs up for people and more and more people will gradually be impacted by this as fixed tariffs start to expire. 

A small Council Tax refund, this "energy bill loan" of £150 and a surely temporary reduction of 5p in fuel duty (saving around £2.50 a tank if fully passed on) isn't going to cut it. The only genuinely good policy was the increase in the NI threshold, which does help many of the people it needs to the most, but it's hard to see that that will be enough. And indeed it doesn't help the very lowest earners, or those on benefits. 

Brand Sunak has been tarnished. He might be the ideological darling of the Tory party, but that doesn't win elections. His days of mass appeal are certainly over unless there is drastic change. 

 

Edited by Michael W
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

You appear to be on the wrong thread.

Read my last sentence. It's part of a broader point. He won't move in any significant way on the cost of living crisis unless he's absolutely forced to.

 

29 minutes ago, Michael W said:

The branding job works when people have money in their pockets. He was just the face of it at the start and so took the plaudits. Credit he didn't deserve? Yes. But that's politics - events can make you, but can equally sink you too. 

When people don't have money in their pocket they see through it and the Chancellor's popularity tanks, which it has. He isn't popular like he was and we haven't even seen the worst yet. Fuel prices and prices increases are biting, but it's energy that's going to be the real kicker and that one is just starring. DDs up for people and more and more people will gradually be impacted by this as fixed tariffs start to expire. 

A small Council Tax refund, this "energy bill loan" of £150 and a surely temporary reduction of 5p in fuel duty (saving around £2.50 a tank if fully passed on) isn't going to cut it. The only genuinely good policy was the increase in the NI threshold, which does help many of the people it needs to the most, but it's hard to see that that will be enough. And indeed it doesn't help the very lowest earners, or those on benefits. 

Brand Sunak has been tarnished. He might be the ideological darling of the Tory party, but that doesn't win elections. His days of mass appeal are certainly over unless there is drastic change. 

 

Here's hoping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/04/2022 at 14:05, Michael W said:

The only genuinely good policy was the increase in the NI threshold, which does help many of the people it needs to the most, but it's hard to see that that will be enough. And indeed it doesn't help the very lowest earners, or those on benefits.  

 

Just noticed today that this isn't immediate and only kicks in from July. Standard half-arsed stuff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...