Jump to content

There was a coo


Recommended Posts

40 minutes ago, Anychance said:

yes, the directors of your club are that far up the sfa arse with the bending over for B teams and conference. the SFA would rather fund a poor performing club rather than awarding clubs in the HL or LL for doing well

its done now big target on Cowdenbeath's back if they don't succeed 

Careful, you might get one too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This is what the SPFL stated prior to the draw in 2022.

With five SPFL clubs again taking part in UEFA competitions next season, the draw will involve the remaining 37 SPFL clubs from 2021/22 plus Highland League champions Fraserburgh and Lowland League champions Bonnyrigg Rose Athletic.

The additional slot will be taken by Highland League runners-up Buckie Thistle as the Lowland League were granted the extra place last season.

And this is what was said in 2021

With five SPFL clubs taking part in UEFA competitions next season, the Premier Sports Cup group stage draw will involve the other 37 SPFL clubs from 2020/21 plus Highland League champions Brora Rangers and Lowland League champions Kelty Hearts.

The new, additional slot in the group stage will be taken this year by East Kilbride, who finished as runners-up in the Lowland League this season. This follows the drawing of lots between East Kilbride and Fraserburgh, the Highland League runners-up.

 

So there was a precedent of tossing a coin between the HL and LL for their runners-up. No mention of clubs relegated in previous seasons being part of the drawing of lots.

Edited by Footballfirst
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, therewasacoo said:

The amount of folk fuming about is being invited is laughable, no other team would’ve declined an invite so don’t see why people think we should’ve 

I don’t think anyone is arguing you should refuse the invite,  it would be insane for you to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, therewasacoo said:

The amount of folk fuming about is being invited is laughable, no other team would’ve declined an invite so don’t see why people think we should’ve 

There is invitation by meritocracy, or invitation by chumocracy. Now which do you think applied in this case?

I don't think that many are critical of Cowdenbeath accepting the invitation, but there are many who are critical of the decision to offer an invitation to Cowdenbeath in the first place.

Edited by Footballfirst
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Footballfirst said:


This is what the SPFL stated prior to the draw in 2022.

With five SPFL clubs again taking part in UEFA competitions next season, the draw will involve the remaining 37 SPFL clubs from 2021/22 plus Highland League champions Fraserburgh and Lowland League champions Bonnyrigg Rose Athletic.

The additional slot will be taken by Highland League runners-up Buckie Thistle as the Lowland League were granted the extra place last season.

And this is what was said in 2021

With five SPFL clubs taking part in UEFA competitions next season, the Premier Sports Cup group stage draw will involve the other 37 SPFL clubs from 2020/21 plus Highland League champions Brora Rangers and Lowland League champions Kelty Hearts.

The new, additional slot in the group stage will be taken this year by East Kilbride, who finished as runners-up in the Lowland League this season. This follows the drawing of lots between East Kilbride and Fraserburgh, the Highland League runners-up.

 

So there was a precedent of tossing a coin between the HL and LL for their runners-up. No mention of clubs relegated in previous seasons being part of the drawing of lots.

It didn’t then say and this is the methodology that will be used in succeeding years nor was it put into the rules.  So maybe the idea was we will do this for a couple of years and once HL and LL runner up have had a shot each we can then do something something different. Is there now in your view a new precedent set that the last SPFL2 team relegated not automatically in the Cup will now be invited in 2024/25?  That may or may not be the case 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Cowden Cowboy said:

It didn’t then say and this is the methodology that will be used in succeeding years nor was it put into the rules.  So maybe the idea was we will do this for a couple of years and once HL and LL runner up have had a shot each we can then do something something different. Is there now in your view a new precedent set that the last SPFL2 team relegated not automatically in the Cup will now be invited in 2024/25?  That may or may not be the case 

I might as well ask you the same question as I asked an earlier poster.

There is invitation by meritocracy, or invitation by chumocracy. Now which do you think applied in this case?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Footballfirst said:

 

I don't think that many are critical of Cowdenbeath accepting the invitation, but there are many who are critical of the decision to offer an invitation to Cowdenbeath in the first place.

That's fair enough, but can the moaning not be done on the League Cup thread though in that case? 

Saying that, it is a particularly slow time of the year for any other chat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Footballfirst said:

So now it's a minimum £24k bung for being a loyal old SPFL club?

Aye, that's what it is. We get given bungs in the most subtle and descrete method of getting put in the League Cup draw. Surprised the bung was ever noticed. Very stealth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, tamthebam said:

Grant.jpg.ff4ffb0815f64a117c84efe0e671150f.jpg

Always wondered what the Uni teams do with any money they make from the season. Are they all currently on a massive "spring break" style jaunt (assuming no re-sits of course)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...