Swarley Posted January 13, 2015 Share Posted January 13, 2015 Profit would have been higher if Fowler had an EXPERIENCED ASSISTANT MANAGER in the dugout.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERSOUTH Posted January 13, 2015 Share Posted January 13, 2015 (edited) Just read that Queens made a £55,000 profit for the last financial year . May not be much but it's another step in the right direction Any profit is good maybe other clubs in our league should take note!!To think that was the year ending 31st May, so hopefully it'll be onwards and upwards from then also. Edited January 13, 2015 by SUPERSOUTH 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRubberFist Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Just read that Queens made a £55,000 profit for the last financial year . May not be much but it's another step in the right direction Any club making a financial profit in Scottish football's current economic climate should be applauded. Maybe our BoD should offer money advice to the likes of the SPFL, SFA, Sevco, etc.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers_Lad Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 (edited) Any profit is good maybe other clubs in our league should take note!! if your going to make such bold statements at least have the baws to name them for the record our accounts The Club’s accounts for the year ended 30th June 2014 have been finalised, approved and signed off by the Auditors. The accounts show almost a 20% increase in profit for the year of £97,499 (previous year £81,350). Edited January 14, 2015 by Rovers_Lad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swarley Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 if your going to make such bold statements at least have the baws to name them Not sure but he might be talking about Rangers, The Rangers, Sevco, and Rangers Football Club Of Glasgow 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_vortex Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Any club making a financial profit in Scottish football's current economic climate should be applauded. Maybe our BoD should offer money advice to the likes of the SPFL, SFA, Sevco, etc.... Absolutely . Having a quick look at the accounts , Queens made £51,000 from the hire of the pitch / Queens Arena . Also Queens paid Billy Hewitson's company Building Craftsmen Ltd - £194,000 for the development work at the Queens Arena . The directors noted that the value of the work carried out was significantly higher than this sum in commercial terms 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outsider Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Considering we've had two new pitches and an Arena built in that time, whilst remaining competitive on the pitch, I'd say any profit is a good achievement. Did the council and sport Scotland not supply most of the money to get the plastic pitch laid at Palmerston? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palmy_cammy Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Did the council and sport Scotland not supply most of the money to get the plastic pitch laid at Palmerston? I knew someone would bring this up regarding my post! There was definitely external funding for the pitch, and also as the_vortex has pointed out, we in all likelihood saved money keeping the construction work for the Arena "in house". I don't think taking advantage of these opportunities weakens my case that the board are doing a good job though. In fact I'd be inclined to suggest it strengthens it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rovers_Lad Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Did the council and sport Scotland not supply most of the money to get the plastic pitch laid at Palmerston? they did 900k ish? queens 50/60k ish? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JRS LEFT PEG Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Marvellous work to still make a profit on our crowds . Just remember in Davie Rae's era we were losing 300 k a year . Great turnaround . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lyle be back Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Not sure but he might be talking about Rangers, The Rangers, Sevco, and Rangers Football Club Of Glasgow And possibly Livi 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyline Drifter Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 It was not J.T. that was the problem. When Kerr said in the Sun that he thought this person had nothing to do with the football side I did wonder how that could be J.T. It was someone close to J.T. who should not have been anywhere near the dressing room. Whatever the rights and wrongs of the Mark Kerr scenario, it absolutely was Jim Thomson he was referring to in that quote and he meant nothing to do with the football side in first team terms. Suggestions that it was someone else are way wide of the mark. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERSOUTH Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Whatever the rights and wrongs of the Mark Kerr scenario, it absolutely was Jim Thomson he was referring to in that quote and he meant nothing to do with the football side in first team terms. Suggestions that it was someone else are way wide of the mark.Not like you to get involved in subjects like this, a little nudge from within to reveal maybe. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeredbook Posted January 15, 2015 Share Posted January 15, 2015 Not like you to get involved in subjects like this, a little nudge from within to reveal maybe. Nail on head . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_vortex Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 Whatever the rights and wrongs of the Mark Kerr scenario, it absolutely was Jim Thomson he was referring to in that quote and he meant nothing to do with the football side in first team terms. Suggestions that it was someone else are way wide of the mark. That you sticking your big pal JT in it Skyline ? Can't see him being happy . Just as well he's on holiday 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERSOUTH Posted January 16, 2015 Share Posted January 16, 2015 That you sticking your big pal JT in it Skyline ? Can't see him being happy . Just as well he's on holiday Think SD is just making the point that it as the assistant manager that was speaking and M Kerr didn't like it. Good riddance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lyle be back Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 Whatever the rights and wrongs of the Mark Kerr scenario, it absolutely was Jim Thomson he was referring to in that quote and he meant nothing to do with the football side in first team terms. Suggestions that it was someone else are way wide of the mark. To me, it shows the stupidity of Kerr's qoute. How is the Assistant Manager of any club not involved in first team affairs. He may not have liked or agreed what Jim said or did but to say he was wrong for claiming that Jim had no right to say or do it. I assume that if he disagrees with Falkirk's assistant manager's comments or approach he will do the same thing? BTW I am not defending Jim here. I dont know what he said or how he gets involved in training, merely saying that Kerr is wrong in the assumption that Fowlrr's assistant shouldn't have a say on first team matters. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 To me, it shows the stupidity of Kerr's qoute. How is the Assistant Manager of any club not involved in first team affairs. He may not have liked or agreed what Jim said or did but to say he was wrong for claiming that Jim had no right to say or do it. I assume that if he disagrees with Falkirk's assistant manager's comments or approach he will do the same thing? BTW I am not defending Jim here. I dont know what he said or how he gets involved in training, merely saying that Kerr is wrong in the assumption that Fowlrr's assistant shouldn't have a say on first team matters. Did he not also describe him as a "non-football person", or am I confused? I've not read the article in question. If so, regardless of a person's view of JT' s coaching ability, it's a bizarre description of an ex-long standing player, who captained the side during some high points of its history. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DUMFRIES_CREW Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 To me, it shows the stupidity of Kerr's qoute. How is the Assistant Manager of any club not involved in first team affairs. He may not have liked or agreed what Jim said or did but to say he was wrong for claiming that Jim had no right to say or do it. I assume that if he disagrees with Falkirk's assistant manager's comments or approach he will do the same thing? BTW I am not defending Jim here. I dont know what he said or how he gets involved in training, merely saying that Kerr is wrong in the assumption that Fowlrr's assistant shouldn't have a say on first team matters. I may be wrong here but I can remember someone saying JT is not involved in day to day training. Only match days 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawk Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 I may be wrong here but I can remember someone saying JT is not involved in day to day training. Only match days From what I've heard you're wrong there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.