Jump to content

America


Recommended Posts




When those things happen in those countries they're massive news because they're so rare. When they happen in the US people just shrug their shoulders and move on because it's a daily occurrence.


FTFY.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, pozbaird said:

Yes, I’m being completely serious. I was on a cruise out of Southampton recently that visited both Oslo and Copenhagen. There have been shootings and folk dying in both cities over the last couple of weeks. Not sure what point you’re making. 

Wow! If those countries (with population taken into account) had mass shootings on the same scale as America the incident in Denmark would have been their 92nd since the last time it occurred, in Norway it would have been their 125th! There is absolutely no comparison. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/07/2022 at 11:59, hk blues said:

Where I am now, it's pretty much the dream of many to move to the US and marry a rich American (all Americans are rich of course) and they've seen and heard so many others who have done that.  However, those who have may be being more than economical with the truth and paint a picture not exactly in line with reality.  And, they only hear from the "successful" ones and the less successful are never heard from again so there's little or no balance.

To many it really does appear to be a utopia.  

America really is excellent at cultural diplomacy and when that fails an invasion or a targeted assassination works as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never really understood this countries obsession with America tbh.
Just another country with its own issues. Like everywhere else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Lex said:

Never really understood this countries obsession with America tbh.
Just another country with its own issues. Like everywhere else.

Given America's dominance in entertainment and media it's inevitable there's more resonance, along with its military and financial clout. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never really understood this countries obsession with America tbh.
Just another country with its own issues. Like everywhere else.
Ironic since America is the one country that has to meddle and get involved with literally everything.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, stevieKTID said:

Word of warning then. Out there they call them 'fanny-packs'. Cos fanny means your arse over there.... Not your John McVeigh is a tit.

 

😀😀 Big Keith, some boi.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Empty It said:
1 hour ago, Lex said:
Never really understood this countries obsession with America tbh.
Just another country with its own issues. Like everywhere else.

Ironic since America is the one country that has to meddle and get involved with literally everything.

I can remember when that was our job...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest mistake people looking at America make is considering it a monolithic society. The 50 States are, quite literally, countries of their own. There are inconsequential differences between some and yawning chasms between others. Consider:

California, staunchly Democratic in a national context, but riven with political infighting between the “costal elites” and the “inland farmers/pot farmers/yokals”. There are currently several active attempts to split the state into multiple states, which will never succeed.

Texas, the formerly Democratic, now Republican, stronghold that is trending strongly toward becoming Democratic again. Wildly varying strongholds of “suburban Republican upper middle class and lower upper class” (north of DFW), “hippie Democratic loving anarchist” (Austin), “conservative Latinos” (San Antonio) and “militant left wing African-Americans” (Houston). Add to that the massive migrant worker population it shares with California and other farming states…

New York, Democratic in the city, Republican in the country, the massive population advantage the Democrats have here makes the State, in the eyes of many right wingers, a Marxist dream.

Idaho, being actively taken over by the Christian Identity and White Nationalist movement, with those resident in Idaho encouraging others to join them in the “Western Redoubt”. They harbour fantasies of creating a White State, independent of the U.S., in the Montana/Idaho/Wyoming/eastern Washington/eastern Oregon area.

Louisiana, strangely conflicted state with French tastes, Catholic urges, and following the Napoleonic Code instead of English Common Law. A haven for the LGTBQ+ in the southeast, Cajun and Creole in the southwest, and firmly Protestant and Republican in the north, a state whose leadership and direction changes more than the Italian government.

Florida, Republican dominated, barely, mainly due to conservative Cuban refuges, but now trending Democratic due to Puerto Ricans flooding in. Gerrymandering is the only reason the Republicans still hold power here, and it’s likely o end in tears.

 

Thats just a quick taste, as nearly every State can have a similar confused description posted. The devolution of rights to the States, recently expedited by the Supreme Court is likely to have reached its furthest extent, and soon the pull back will occur, again. The most confusing thing for those outside this maelstrom to understand is just how quickly something can radically change because of these weird combinations. While I fear what may happen over the next few years on the rights and theocracy front, I’m pretty sure it will all come out in the wash in a truly surprising fashion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TxRover said:

The biggest mistake people looking at America make is considering it a monolithic society. The 50 States are, quite literally, countries of their own. 

They are quite literally not countries of their own champ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TxRover said:

The biggest mistake people looking at America make is considering it a monolithic society. The 50 States are, quite literally, countries of their own. There are inconsequential differences between some and yawning chasms between others. Consider:

California, staunchly Democratic in a national context, but riven with political infighting between the “costal elites” and the “inland farmers/pot farmers/yokals”. There are currently several active attempts to split the state into multiple states, which will never succeed.

Texas, the formerly Democratic, now Republican, stronghold that is trending strongly toward becoming Democratic again. Wildly varying strongholds of “suburban Republican upper middle class and lower upper class” (north of DFW), “hippie Democratic loving anarchist” (Austin), “conservative Latinos” (San Antonio) and “militant left wing African-Americans” (Houston). Add to that the massive migrant worker population it shares with California and other farming states…

New York, Democratic in the city, Republican in the country, the massive population advantage the Democrats have here makes the State, in the eyes of many right wingers, a Marxist dream.

Idaho, being actively taken over by the Christian Identity and White Nationalist movement, with those resident in Idaho encouraging others to join them in the “Western Redoubt”. They harbour fantasies of creating a White State, independent of the U.S., in the Montana/Idaho/Wyoming/eastern Washington/eastern Oregon area.

Louisiana, strangely conflicted state with French tastes, Catholic urges, and following the Napoleonic Code instead of English Common Law. A haven for the LGTBQ+ in the southeast, Cajun and Creole in the southwest, and firmly Protestant and Republican in the north, a state whose leadership and direction changes more than the Italian government.

Florida, Republican dominated, barely, mainly due to conservative Cuban refuges, but now trending Democratic due to Puerto Ricans flooding in. Gerrymandering is the only reason the Republicans still hold power here, and it’s likely o end in tears.

 

Thats just a quick taste, as nearly every State can have a similar confused description posted. The devolution of rights to the States, recently expedited by the Supreme Court is likely to have reached its furthest extent, and soon the pull back will occur, again. The most confusing thing for those outside this maelstrom to understand is just how quickly something can radically change because of these weird combinations. While I fear what may happen over the next few years on the rights and theocracy front, I’m pretty sure it will all come out in the wash in a truly surprising fashion.

Cool story.

The mass shootings happen all over though

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, invergowrie arab said:

Cool story.

The mass shootings happen all over though

 

Absolutely, but if you look a bit more closely…the targets are often urban/suburban. For instance, few mass shootings in the majority of the Midwest and rural areas, perhaps because of the limited pickings, or maybe for another reason. See how several shooters have traveled to get to their preferred targets:

Buffalo: Shooter traveled 200+ miles from a small town to shoot up a business patronized by African Americans he believed were trying to replace White Americans.

El Paso: Shooter travelled 600+ miles from a White suburb of Dallas to El Paso to kill immigrants he believed were trying to replace White Americans.

Orlando: Shooter travelled 100+ miles from a suburban community to Orlando to find a large, gay nightclub. Shooter was categorized as a terrorist.


School shootings, on the other hand, tend to be local persons shooting up a school they know…but they seldom happen in rural area, and rather in suburban areas. So why are these suburban areas creating these shooters who either travel or target soft targets in their area? That’s the American problem. American society has ossified to the extent that there is less class mobility in the U.S. than the U.K. these days. The 15-25 White suburban male demographic is the primary reservoir of mass shooters, and until people start taking their comments seriously, reporting them, and having them investigated, will continue to exact a toll on the U.S.

Perhaps there is less despair in the rural communities, and the urban communities seem to be destroying within themselves in a manner that defuses these explosions. The hypocrisy of people blaming the violence on “them”, when their kids are the ones they should be afraid of, is not lost on many people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Story of America.

Turned up at Louisiana bus station, had a campsite booked already. Just had to get there.

Got out the bus, a few taxi guys asking where I'm going...went to the side of the bus, got my tent and gear (gas tank, and a few pots).

They all walked away, thinking (he got no money). Stood for about 20minutes (while all the taxi drivers watching).

Then, BANG. This guy walked up and asked where you going? I gave him the place.  His face was like. WTF

I said lets get this done. We drove for about 5mins.  

IT WAS THE SHITEHOLE OF AMERICA (it was a campsite that folk from the Hurricane Katrina were housed, 4 years before)

Got set up (with all eyes on me), then asked next door (tent) where I can buy some food to cook?

His answer 'You're going nowhere friend, you eat with me and my family tonight' 

😍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TxRover said:

Absolutely, but if you look a bit more closely…the targets are often urban/suburban. For instance, few mass shootings in the majority of the Midwest and rural areas, perhaps because of the limited pickings, or maybe for another reason. See how several shooters have traveled to get to their preferred targets:

Buffalo: Shooter traveled 200+ miles from a small town to shoot up a business patronized by African Americans he believed were trying to replace White Americans.

El Paso: Shooter travelled 600+ miles from a White suburb of Dallas to El Paso to kill immigrants he believed were trying to replace White Americans.

Orlando: Shooter travelled 100+ miles from a suburban community to Orlando to find a large, gay nightclub. Shooter was categorized as a terrorist.


School shootings, on the other hand, tend to be local persons shooting up a school they know…but they seldom happen in rural area, and rather in suburban areas. So why are these suburban areas creating these shooters who either travel or target soft targets in their area? That’s the American problem. American society has ossified to the extent that there is less class mobility in the U.S. than the U.K. these days. The 15-25 White suburban male demographic is the primary reservoir of mass shooters, and until people start taking their comments seriously, reporting them, and having them investigated, will continue to exact a toll on the U.S.

Perhaps there is less despair in the rural communities, and the urban communities seem to be destroying within themselves in a manner that defuses these explosions. The hypocrisy of people blaming the violence on “them”, when their kids are the ones they should be afraid of, is not lost on many people.

Only 14% of the population live in rural areas though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...