Jump to content

Monarchy debate/discussion


Richey Edwards

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, lau03143 said:

Constitutional Monarchies work, by theoretically having parliament accountable to a Monarch through various conventions, oaths etc. Some of the most stable democracies and highest GDP economies in the world are Constitutional Monarchies. Britain (plus Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc), Denmark, Norway, Holland, Belgium, and Sweden are all good examples.

Plenty of the most stable democracies and highest GDP countries in the world are republics though. Here's nine that all have higher GDPs per capita than the UK. Singapore, Ireland, Switzerland, USA, Austria, Iceland, Germany, Finland, France.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gordon EF said:

Plenty of the most stable democracies and highest GDP countries in the world are republics though. Here's nine that all have higher GDPs per capita than the UK. Singapore, Ireland, Switzerland, USA, Austria, Iceland, Germany, Finland, France.

 

Pfft, stupid successful EU countries.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, lau03143 said:

I find the discussion of Republic vs. Monarchy very interesting, but what no one can explain with a Republic is how to protect against Populist factions, which can cause mayhem with most Republics. Or to protect against a lunatic President (like Trump).

Constitutional Monarchies work, by theoretically having parliament accountable to a Monarch through various conventions, oaths etc. Some of the most stable democracies and highest GDP economies in the world are Constitutional Monarchies. Britain (plus Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc), Denmark, Norway, Holland, Belgium, and Sweden are all good examples.

 

BiB - unless you can determine a different correlation between the two, I tend to believe that some stable countries with high GDPs have simply still got their constitutional monarchs through a lack of will to get rid of them, rather than stability and high GDP being in any way a result of their having constitutional monarchs. Stability comes from the people’s willingness to participate peacefully, not from the top.

Incidentally, it’s worth looking at modern Germany and Ireland to see how to have a functioning democracy with constitutional presidents and without crazy populists wielding executive power (like, you know, arch-monarchists Boris Johnson and Liz Truss here).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Granny Danger said:

Aye and the bit about having his own toilet seat carried around for him.

Yet this is the Britain most people seem to want.

To be fair, if I was in a position where I could have someone carry round a personal toilet seat for me, I'd definitely be using it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tamthebam said:

It reminds me of the first Blackadder where Prince Edmund was stripped of all titles except Lord Warden of the Royal Privies. Now his Royal Nonceness has the role of going about picking up dug shite (which he won't do obv)

 

Don't feel sorry for him - we've already paid him c.£2m per dug that he'll clean up after.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, lau03143 said:

As we move forward though, I think it's important from any government to review the role of Monarchy, whether that be Westminster or Holyrood, and I think any future vote on Independence, the any party taking part should clearly state in it's manifesto it's long term strategy on the Monarchy.

Two totally different things.  Why confuse them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, hearthammer said:

Just switched on to the service.  I see all of the circus performers are decked out in their full fancy dress outfits with all of them bedecked in a wheen of medals and trinkets - even wee Eddie.   🤣🤣  

The Americans must love all this shit.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DiegoDiego said:

Would any right-minded group of individuals when designing a new state from scratch say "let's give the top job to this bloke and his descendants can rule over us for ever more"? Unless the answer is yes, there's no reason to keep the monarchy.

Somewhere that's had a monarchy for over 1,000 years, possibly 😉 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hearthammer said:

Just switched on to the service.  I see all of the circus performers are decked out in their full fancy dress outfits with all of them bedecked in a wheen of medals and trinkets - even wee Eddie.   🤣🤣  

The Americans must love all this shit.  

leonid.jpg.b10b6ea178ea717dd450f73729b85c44.jpg

Breznhev liked a medal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...