Jump to content

Russell Brand - In Plain Sight


ICTChris

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, Ziggy Sobotka said:

"You can do anything. You just got to grab them by the booky wooky"

Pretty thick of me but the Katherine Ryan "Rapey Wape" comment took months for me to join the dots.

Edit- Just remembered I didn't, someone pointed it out to me.

 

Edited by Moomintroll
Memory lapse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

bUt WhY dId It TaKe ThEm So LoNg To CoMe FoRwArD???

^^^ how to announce to the world that you think sexual assault isn't serious

These clowns probably think Savile's legacy has been treated unfairly because hE wAs NeVaR cOnViCtEd Of NuFfInK!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Quitongo's Left Peg is the guy who got done IRL for something dodgy, right?

I see Katy Perry's name has been popping up among some of his supporters, like she's a grand mastermind who waited until now to get revenge on her ex for some reason  :lol:

(Brand's ex, not QLP's AFAIK)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, BTFD said:

@Quitongo's Left Peg is the guy who got done IRL for something dodgy, right?

I see Katy Perry's name has been popping up among some of his supporters, like she's a grand mastermind who waited until now to get revenge on her ex for some reason  :lol:

(Brand's ex, not QLP's AFAIK)

I might be mixing up Ayrshire posters, but didn't QLP get done for stealing credit card details (and then using them) from itzdrk and the ex-mrs qlp, who at that point was mrs itzdrk?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mark Connolly said:

I might be mixing up Ayrshire posters, but didn't QLP get done for stealing credit card details (and then using them) from itzdrk and the ex-mrs qlp, who at that point was mrs itzdrk?

Didn’t know that, but it’s a bit unfair criticising posters for not knowing what would happen 9 years in the future? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brother Blades said:

Didn’t know that, but it’s a bit unfair criticising posters for not knowing what would happen 9 years in the future? 

I was just offering a straight answer to the "didn't he do something dodgy" question.

But if we're playing the prediction game, I fully expect to be saying in 9 years time that I always knew @Francesc Fabregas was a wrongun

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mark Connolly said:

I was just offering a straight answer to the "didn't he do something dodgy" question.

But if we're playing the prediction game, I fully expect to be saying in 9 years time that I always knew @Francesc Fabregas was a wrongun

Don’t think there’s any need to wait 9 years IMVHO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mark Connolly said:

I might be mixing up Ayrshire posters, but didn't QLP get done for stealing credit card details (and then using them) from itzdrk and the ex-mrs qlp, who at that point was mrs itzdrk?

Some story arc. We need more of this P&B soap opera stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the allegations are true then he should go to jail.

But it shouldn’t stop there, there should be a thorough investigation into his enablers.  Saville got away with it for years because people who could have stopped it turned a blind eye and no one paid the price.  This should not be allowed to happen this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mark Connolly said:

I was just offering a straight answer to the "didn't he do something dodgy" question.

But if we're playing the prediction game, I fully expect to be saying in 9 years time that I always knew @Francesc Fabregas was a wrongun

Seconded, with the caveat that everyone is innocent until proven guilty and I remember that poor falsely accused oddball teacher in Bristol who got lawyered up.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Brother Blades said:

Good on the lad Sloss for being upfront. But why not say something sooner? Lawyers & a rich guy? Probably. 

I think Catherine Ryan basically said it was a combination of not wanting to be sued into oblivion by his army of lawyers and the fact she wasn’t a victim herself so it wasn’t her place to make it public. I imagine that’s why others were the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jaggy McJagface said:

I think Catherine Ryan basically said it was a combination of not wanting to be sued into oblivion by his army of lawyers and the fact she wasn’t a victim herself so it wasn’t her place to make it public. I imagine that’s why others were the same.

Yeah, I’ve read elsewhere that there was also the possibility of a Super Injunction too, which makes Sloss appear more of a good guy.

If Fielding, Ross etc don’t comment, they are either complicit or cowards. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...