Jump to content

What is the point of labour ?


pawpar

Recommended Posts

 

The first half hour of this video is a talk by a Ukrainian political economist, "Who needs the state anyway?". Even somebody whose society is currently deep in tragedy is still keen to point out universal lessons.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zdf6AViJSNk&t=1614s

 

Quote

Authoritarianism and schizo-fascism can be interpreted as Russia’s failure to build a functioning capitalist state…how feasible is it to build such a state if countries with countless resources such as Russia fail. Or UK failed to regulate its polluting water companies. Or United States failed to provide adequate healthcare access to a large percentage of its price-excluded population. If the biggest economies in the world fail to build functioning capitalist states, why do we continue to pursue those modes of states?

She doesn't view Russia as some extra-terrestrial, inexplicable phenomenon but rather as a different point on the same spectrum as USA and UK. The two poles to that spectrum being failing state and functioning state. 

 

Quote

The erosion of social security combined with the emboldening of capital at the expense of labour and nature, and the state’s inability to serve as the constitution’s guarantor of rights and freedoms, are what largely conditioned the Revolution of Dignity.

The Maidan revolution was a response to Ukrainians having the shitest living standards on their continent and such little collective control over their society due to the weakness of their state.

 

Quote

The state is a very important institution. We're frequently told that it isn't but it is. Social classes and modes of extraction of value from humans and nature are organised in present day systems trans-nationally. This means that they function through and in circumvention of the institution of the state and that is so by design; through state created extra-jurisdictional such as offshore and special economic zones where extraction of capital and surface value can happen outside the purview of the state.

Opposing the above is a type of nationalism I'd personally like SNP to think more about.

 

Quote

In some thirty years, they (a research group) haven't found one enterprise that functioned better in private hands than it functioned under public hands. It's always more expensive. You lose control, accountability and efficacy. 

Quote

This concrete state failure is now being interpreted, paradoxically, by Ukrainian politicians as a reason to further dismantle the state including in its ability to oversee the functioning of capital, which is precisely what created the problems in the first place. Instead of shrinking the state, I'd argue that what needs to happen...is that the purview and remit of the state needs to be expanded.

The second quote there is what has happened in Ukraine since 1991 and should be obviously recognisable as the Tory aim for UK. Labour are now the government and we'll need to hope they take the same view as that last sentence.

Edited by Freedom Farter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Freedom Farter said:

 

The first half hour of this video is a talk by a Ukrainian political economist, "Who needs the state anyway?". Even somebody whose society is currently deep in tragedy is still keen to point out universal lessons.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zdf6AViJSNk&t=1614s

 

She doesn't view Russia as some extra-terrestrial, inexplicable phenomenon but rather as a different point on the same spectrum as USA and UK. The two poles to that spectrum being failing state and functioning state. 

 

The Maidan revolution was a response to Ukrainians having the shitest living standards on their continent and such little collective control over their society due to the weakness of their state.

 

Opposing the above is a type of nationalism I'd personally like SNP to think more about.

 

The second quote there is what has happened in Ukraine since 1991 and should be obviously recognisable as the Tory aim for UK. Labour are now the government and we'll need to hope they take the same view as that last sentence.

The objective of private sector house builders is to make a profit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • pawpar changed the title to What is the point of labour ?

ICC is headquartered in Netherlands and its prosecutor is a Brit who was born in Edinburgh. It couldn't be a more UK-friendly institution. Among the many crimes overseen by the two Israeli men being sought for prosecution, Netanyahu and Gallant, was the murder of three British aid workers, all former UK military servicemen. There is overwhelming UK public consent for the ICC arrest warrants to be acceded to. Yet still, our government unilaterally resists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Homer Thompson changed the title to Have a beer with Sir Keith at the rear of IKEA

 

On 23/02/2024 at 10:23, Cheese said:

Why not just make being a politician a protected characteristic, or make it illegal to shout at anyone who earns over 60 grand a year ?

 

Fair play, they're gonna do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 13/07/2024 at 17:52, Fullerene said:

Whereas Slade thought he was crap and went for Noddy Holder instead.

I'm with Slade here. As is Walsall Gallery. Whose lift uses Plant's nasal whine? Nobody's. That's whose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Homer Thompson changed the title to Have a beer with Sir Keir at the rear of IKEA
3 hours ago, Bully Wee Villa said:

Seems pretty reasonable to investigate violence and threats of violence against candidates, tbf.

This seems like a job for plod, rather than a spurious think tank of people who have both an interesting view of what 'democracy is, and what 'political violence' is and indeed, what individuals and groups deserve sympathy when said 'political violence' is carried out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I read the BBC report I thought there had been another camper van type scandal, but it was because a £200,000 campaign donation not a £200,000 camping donation.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, scottsdad said:

Shite new thread title @Homer Thompson

It doesn't even make sense. Why would you have a beer at the back of a furniture shop? His name's not "Kia Starmer" and no one says "I-kear".

IT DOESN'T EVEN RHYME FFS!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Homer Thompson absolutely stupid title.

Anyway.

Raynor showing herself to be totally gutless.  Many ways to respond to Vance’s stupid comment and she chose the worst, most obsequious one possible.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn07e2ep20no
 

She added that she "looked forward" to meeting him and Mr Trump if they won the US election in November.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...