Skyline Drifter Posted Sunday at 09:07 Share Posted Sunday at 09:07 2 minutes ago, The Moonster said: I've just watched it and there's no f**king chance it's serious foul play He's come in with a lot of pace, out of control and nowhere near the ball. Its not that much of a reach. I imagine it was given, harshly, for DOGSO though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted Sunday at 09:19 Share Posted Sunday at 09:19 10 minutes ago, Skyline Drifter said: He's come in with a lot of pace, out of control and nowhere near the ball. Its not that much of a reach. I imagine it was given, harshly, for DOGSO though. Come on man. He's in control of himself, his feet are on the ground and I'm not even convinced there's a lot of contact. If that's a serious foul turn the lights out and bolt the door cause the game is gone. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squeezebox-son Posted Sunday at 09:51 Share Posted Sunday at 09:51 Haven't changed my opinion at all. Not sure about how much contact, he's heading so wide (even though the free kick was taken more centrally), and he's not even the last man because Durnan is in line with them when the challenge happens. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted Sunday at 10:01 Share Posted Sunday at 10:01 Niang looks fairly clearly fouled in the lead up to the Annan goal too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Paddy Flannery Posted Sunday at 10:01 Share Posted Sunday at 10:01 I’m sorry but that is an absolutely horrendous game changing decision. Anyone suggesting ex players make better referees because they “played the game” is kidding themselves on if that is the standard. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
19QOS19 Posted Sunday at 10:05 Share Posted Sunday at 10:05 That's an awful decision. He wasn't quick to flash the red either so he clearly discussed it with the linesman and thought about it first and still managed to make a complete arse of it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marco44 Posted Sunday at 10:21 Share Posted Sunday at 10:21 I wasn’t convinced that it was a red card. Just watched the highlights and I’m still not sure if it was a foul. In the end I was happy with the draw but not sure Annan deserved the draw. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fae_the_'briggs Posted Sunday at 10:25 Share Posted Sunday at 10:25 Seems harsh, very harsh. Can't really tell from that if keeper's studs were up or he caught the ball with his toe, def looked to play the ball and his foot wasn't to high. That would be a perfect sliding tackle in the days when tackles were allowed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
O'Kelly Isley III Posted Sunday at 10:34 Share Posted Sunday at 10:34 To me, if Long had made significant physical contact with the attacker then that player would not have continued his completely linear travel before hitting the ground. In other words two players and the ball collided in what used to be known as a tackle rather than the keeper wiping out the Annan player. If it had been the latter he'd have gone down in a heap. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Paddy Flannery Posted Sunday at 10:34 Share Posted Sunday at 10:34 Matthew Shiels should join Sean Murdoch in hanging his head in shame. An absolutely shameful miss. Make Kalvin Orsi great again. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
microdave Posted Sunday at 11:04 Share Posted Sunday at 11:04 30 minutes ago, Bring Back Paddy Flannery said: Matthew Shiels should join Sean Murdoch in hanging his head in shame. An absolutely shameful miss. Make Kalvin Orsi great again. Yep. Got to just smash it in from there instead of placement. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
squeezebox-son Posted Sunday at 11:07 Share Posted Sunday at 11:07 29 minutes ago, Bring Back Paddy Flannery said: Matthew Shiels should join Sean Murdoch in hanging his head in shame. An absolutely shameful miss. Make Kalvin Orsi great again. I was surprised we never put Kalvin on yesterday. In a game where we were pegged in, someone to carry the ball forward would have been handy. There's also the fact that Shiels hadn't had the best game and wad fair tiring out of things. I actually thought we could have hooked Millar at the same time we brought on Lynas and I'd have moved Carlo into the midfield role and put Kalvin on the right. We were falling deeper and deeper and could have benefited from that option. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FifeSons Posted Sunday at 11:35 Author Share Posted Sunday at 11:35 1 hour ago, squeezebox-son said: Haven't changed my opinion at all. Not sure about how much contact, he's heading so wide (even though the free kick was taken more centrally), and he's not even the last man because Durnan is in line with them when the challenge happens. Yep, it’s a shocker of a decision. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
84yards Posted Sunday at 11:41 Share Posted Sunday at 11:41 Annan playing in blue at home is utter woke nonsense. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FifeSons Posted Sunday at 11:46 Author Share Posted Sunday at 11:46 1 hour ago, Bring Back Paddy Flannery said: Matthew Shiels should join Sean Murdoch in hanging his head in shame. An absolutely shameful miss. Make Kalvin Orsi great again. Two shameful misses! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hauftimedraw Posted Sunday at 12:23 Share Posted Sunday at 12:23 FWIW I thought we were pish poor yesterday and very lucky indeed to get anything from that game. Only a great stop by Jamie Smith kept us in it in the second half. Should have took the opportunity to put the wee guy in goals under pressure by moving Tam Muir up front much earlier. If that was his debut he can be pleased with his performance and am sure he will have harder paper rounds in front of him. As for the sending off I was behind the goal and thought it definitely was a red card. Watching the video today I'm not that sure. Lucky there's no VAR at this level for us... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FifeSons Posted Sunday at 12:41 Author Share Posted Sunday at 12:41 We’ve absolutely got to be appealing the red. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FifeSons Posted Sunday at 13:53 Author Share Posted Sunday at 13:53 The ball is literally going out of play 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumpysonoftherock Posted Sunday at 14:04 Share Posted Sunday at 14:04 1 hour ago, FifeSons said: We’ve absolutely got to be appealing the red. I’d doubt if it was appealed that it would be overturned imho. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FifeSons Posted Sunday at 14:14 Author Share Posted Sunday at 14:14 9 minutes ago, Grumpysonoftherock said: I’d doubt if it was appealed that it would be overturned imho. I agree. Though not because they’d think it was a red, they’ll just want to back the ref. I’d still appeal, though. You can’t just sit back and accept a decision like that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.