Jump to content

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Black_and_White_Stripes said:

How did this have only one up vote? The police are not there to dispense justice. If somebody has surrendered, they should be restrained, cautioned and taken into custody; the police do not have the right to physically assault him as some form of punishment.

FWIW, I wondered if the 'pile on' might be because many of the police officers wanted to claim to have been involved in his apprehension. Something to tell their grandkids about, perhaps?

"So Granda, what you're long winded, shitey story basically boils down to is that you and eight other officers piled onto a freely surrendering man, just so you could claim a piece of the action"?

"You really are a disgusting, opportunistic auld p***k, aren't you?, they should have had your pension for that". (Although thank f**k they didn't, a wee bit of inheritance might at least dull the embarrassment of being related to you).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Arch Stanton said:

 

 

Fergie was doing this for years with the Brazilian twins he had. A cheeky free HT substitute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It gets mentioned a lot that Rees-Mogg was cutting about with his nanny as a grown man, but was there ever a reason given?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   1 member

×
×
  • Create New...