ayrmad Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 OK which team is more valuable? The Motherwell guidance document said: So 31% of our gate income comes from Rangers, meanwhile here we all are discussing the financial ramifications of Rangers no longer being in the league, which are greater than they would be if it was any other club outside Celtic. We have clubs releasing statement after statement warning of the consequences of no Rangers in the league. According to St Mirren's latest, our sponsors have exit clauses that they can invoke because Rangers aren't in the league, and Sky said "competition would deteriorate, and in that event we would have to renegotiate". Seems like a pretty open and shut case to me mate. Who do you think is more valuable? Don't start quoting that guidance document, your chartered accountant and forensic accountant can hardly grasp basic arithmetic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 We're talking about a once in 125 years situation here. Might as well budget based on David Icke being right about Arran being underwater. This is an extremely rare situation exacerbated by some very unfortunate global circumstances. I don't think clubs should budget based on the most valuable club in the country going tits up. Which "unfortunate global circumstances" are you talking about? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solongaswekickthemout Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Hi has anybody got a link to the SPL proposal doc? Thanks in advance OFGTF 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thistle_do_nicely Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 (edited) Granny Danger - I don't know HibeeJibee - What statistical evidence do you have that the chicken did in fact cross the road? Jim McLean's Ghost - It was necessary to save Rangers and therefore the future of Scottish football. Madwullie - Eh'm mad ye ken, really mad. T_S_A_R - chickens don't have to cross roads! legally, a road doesn't have to be crossed by chickens. Captain Sensible - The chicken was never allowed to cross the road. Why? Simple; it's all the Old Firms fault. They have a vested interest in not allowing chickens to cross roads because it suits their bigotted agendas. I can't wait for the Old Firm to die, so that the sectarian agenda set by Rangers and their bigoted brothers Celtic leaves poultry free to cross whatever roads they please and the whole world will be a far better place! Edited June 29, 2012 by Thistle_do_nicely 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever Diamond Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 f**k them. Let them die! Hear,hear 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Simple. Any creditor of RFC should be championing each and every attempt to hold those responsible, legally, liable under criminal or civil law. HMRC are, merely, better placed to pursue matters than most others Im sure they will. HMRC have already said they will pursue past directors of Rangers FC. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 It's this season that's the problem. I thought we all got this. After that brutal cuts can be made. It can't be this season, your club will not have sevco this season. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Granny Danger - I don't know HibeeJibee - What statistical evidence do you have that the chicken did in fact cross the road? Awwwwwww. Nooooooooo. Granny, you are only encouraging him. Asking for statistical evidence means you will get it, big time. If it wasn't all electronic on P&B we could be looking at 3 or 4 Brazilian rain forests paying the price. As Ally has said "Beware what you ask for". Suggest you book yourself in for a wee lie down tomorrow afternoon. Your heid will be dirlin by then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madwullie Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 "What is a cynic? A man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing." Oscar Wilde. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broken Algorithms Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 For a day where NewCo are expected to get in their registration to the SFA, things have been exceptionally quiet. First quiet day in quite a while actually... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Which "unfortunate global circumstances" are you talking about? His big team going into meltdown or that recession that started hmmmmmm years ago. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glen Sannox Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 They can dress this bollocks up any way they want, but at the end of the day, they will always be known as "Cheats with no history" Sevco fans hate it, i've been riling these fuds in the Pub with it, and believe me they hate it. I appeal to all non Sevco fans to always refer to them as "Cheats with no history" or something similar please. Many thanks 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 They can dress this bollocks up any way they want, but at the end of the day, they will always be known as "Cheats with no history" Sevco fans hate it, i've been riling these fuds in the Pub with it, and believe me they hate it. I appeal to all non Sevco fans to always refer to them as "Cheats with no history" or something similar please. Many thanks Surely, they cant be both. If they are cheats then they must be the same club as before, therefore have history. If the have no history then they area new club who have not, yet, cheated. I dont think you've thought this through Although, your reasoning is still significantly above the standard of Laeotaekhun 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 (edited) I'm sorry Mr Yardley played (using the word very gingerly) for us, I called I'm his more exotic name Jesus De Fuk. I was just chancing my arm, he obviously visited the bridie stall regularly. Edited June 29, 2012 by ayrmad 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 I'm not a supporter of RFC, or any other Scottish Club.. Are you lost? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Duly corrected. At least the message was picked up. Where I live it's nearly a hanging offence if you don't know the words to "The Sash". A mile up the road, it's nearly a hanging offence if you do know the words. Mind how you go. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 They can dress this bollocks up any way they want, but at the end of the day, they will always be known as "Cheats with no history" Sevco fans hate it, i've been riling these fuds in the Pub with it, and believe me they hate it. I appeal to all non Sevco fans to always refer to them as "Cheats with no history" or something similar please. Many thanks Aye - try that in Methil with the Orcs pal - nearest Casualty place is 16 miles away - the first rule of fight bars is "We don't talk aboots Rangers" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helpma Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 T_S_A_R - chickens don't have to cross roads! legally, a road doesn't have to be crossed by chickens. Captain Sensible - The chicken was never allowed to cross the road. Why? Simple; it's all the Old Firms fault. They have a vested interest in not allowing chickens to cross roads because it suits their bigotted agendas. I can't wait for the Old Firm to die, so that the sectarian agenda set by Rangers and their bigoted brothers Celtic leaves poultry free to cross whatever roads they please and the whole world will be a far better place! Bomber Broon: Ahm no gonnae tell you who ma chicken is, cos the meedja wull jist pluck it. But ah wull tell youse, ah've got hunners o'chickens. This boy here in the front, he's ma chicken. In fact, youse are ALL ma chickens 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 Hi has anybody got a link to the SPL proposal doc? Thanks in advance OFGTF My link 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 T_S_A_R - chickens don't have to cross roads! legally, a road doesn't have to be crossed by chickens. Captain Sensible - The chicken was never allowed to cross the road. Why? Simple; it's all the Old Firms fault. They have a vested interest in not allowing chickens to cross roads because it suits their bigotted agendas. I can't wait for the Old Firm to die, so that the sectarian agenda set by Rangers and their bigoted brothers Celtic leaves poultry free to cross whatever roads they please and the whole world will be a far better place! Unfortunately the greenie quantum has been utilised. I wonder if you could really get a deep insight into people's personalities by asking them to answer fairly innocous questions or riddles. Awwwwwww. Nooooooooo. Granny, you are only encouraging him. Asking for statistical evidence means you will get it, big time. If it wasn't all electronic on P&B we could be looking at 3 or 4 Brazilian rain forests paying the price. As Ally has said "Beware what you ask for". Suggest you book yourself in for a wee lie down tomorrow afternoon. Your heid will be dirlin by then. If he's in his loft/basement/coffin doing research he's not on here bothering me. When he comes back with the evidence I'll ask for a bibliography of source material. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.