thelegendthatis Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 As Tedi says,you can categorise Rangers with whoever you like,that's your prerogative but nevertheless the first tieir tribunal verdict found in favour of the PLC,that's indisputable. I am just trying to explain why Rangers are so despised. Not just by supporters of the diddy teams, but also by people who never go near football. They see Rangers as an evil, arrogant, tax cheating, generally dodgy anti social organisation. In fact nothing going for them at all. I know the Rangers/Sevco fans see it differently, but their attitude and behaviour merely reinforces and justifies the hatred against them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 HMRC says Rangers owe tax - HMRC 1 Rangers 0 FTT say Rangers don't owe tax - HMRC 1 Rangers 1 Next goal's the winner... As FTT applied a legal ruling i would think that it's advantage Rangers,rather than deuce. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliche Guevara Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 1-1 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Did those bears not lose their money in the death of rangers CVA rejection days? And he wants them to invest in the new club? On the day the Dandy finally dies as a printed comic, it's good to see one of the characters lives on... We lost the value of the stock that was applied to the bonds as well as the rights held by the holder,such as guarantee of seat,season ticket re-newal at any time and discounts that were applied to the bond. As well as that any return of season ticket sale to another fan,as in the bondholder could get a percentage of the sale if he/she didn't take up the ST for any season. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 1-1 Advantage PLC,ruling has to be overturned. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain_Sensible Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 (edited) Jim Traynor article from June in which he clearly also believes that The Rangers is a new club. newco equals a new club But Rangers FC wont. Theyll slip into liquidation within the next couple of weeks with a new company emerging but 140 years of history, triumph and tears, will have ended.No matter how Charles Green attempts to dress it up, a newco equals a new club. When the CVA was thrown out Rangers as we know them died. Edited December 4, 2012 by Captain_Sensible 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 We lost the value of the stock that was applied to the bonds as well as the rights held by the holder,such as guarantee of seat,season ticket re-newal at any time and discounts that were applied to the bond. As well as that any return of season ticket sale to another fan,as in the bondholder could get a percentage of the sale if he/she didn't take up the ST for any season. And rangers fans are seriously talking about throwing their money into Charlie's pocket? f**k me, but he saw you lot coming. Not personal, Youngsy, but to identify a group of people so willing to hand over their cash, he'll be selling you the Eiffel Tower next . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 1354640047[/url]' post='6864964']They ran a legal tax avoidance scheme, all the annoyance in the world does not change the word legal Until hmrc find you guilty. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 They ran a legal tax avoidance scheme, all the annoyance in the world does not change the word legal It was so legal Rangers got took to court for it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
statts1976uk Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 (edited) Since The Rangers are refusing a ticket allocation for their Scottish Cup tie then will they also refuse the share of the gate they are entitled to? Edited December 4, 2012 by statts1976uk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 They ran a borderline legal tax avoidance scheme - the legality of which is going to be appealed, all the annoyance in the world does not change the word legal ftfy anyways, players arrived at Ibrox on the 'nod and wink' agreement that they would receive 'financial reward' that was much much higher than what was on the contracts lodged with the SFL / SFA. cheating all the other clubs. (see previous 4,000 plus pages for detail) -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 HMRC says Rangers owe tax - HMRC 1 Rangers 0 FTT say Rangers don't owe tax - HMRC 1 Rangers 1 Next goal's the winner... Actually, humour aside, if HMRC get permission and then win the appeal, The Rangers can then take it to the law courts. (as I understand it). Game on. This is going to run and run and run until we are sick of it. Of course if it upsets supporters of The Clone Rangers then many on P&B will never get sick of it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 won't somebody think of the hospitals? Hahahaha 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 They recieved loans (see the tribunals findings for more detail) How many loans did the recipients ever pay back ? and even worse how much was actually ever paid back in total Tedi ? and on that subject I think we have the HMRC's winner ! 2-1 HMRC 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 did they? OK then,legal action was taken against them if you want to be picky FFS !. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 did they? Aye. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Of course, we already knew the truth. As our club regroups on its road back to our rightful place lording it over all beneath us in Scotland - it was never in any serious doubt. Media outlets the world over have arrived at Ibrox to tell the tale of our remarkable resilience and the wonderful dedication of our support. From America, Holland, France, Japan and more they have come - the message is out there for all to see. Meanwhile, in a tiny corner of northern Europe - the ever-dwindling band of naysayers have never been more of an irrelevance (comprising as they do of some bitter plastics and a tiny handful of tawdry diddies) or more bitter about their failure to kill our greatest of clubs. They placed all their faith in the internet warriors - the IRA writer, the runaway, the disgraced bungler and more - who, in turn, lied to them. In despair, and no sooner had the BTC result damned their heroes, a new breed of Emperors were found - step forward the likes of Suckit, Fuckit and Duckit - to continue the pretence. Bendy's opinion of other Scottish football fans and the teams that they follow is not very high. Basically he thinks they are rubbish. However he also thinks that the team he used to support were wonderful because they managed to beat these 'useless' teams more often than not. Not really much of a claim to greatness, is it? Anyhoo, Rangers are deid and it won't be long before The Clones are too. (Typed with bitterness and bile after the Jags' exit from the cup.) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliche Guevara Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 What legal action? The police raiding Ibrox and seizing documents that were being illegally concealed, for a start. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Since The Rangers are refusing a ticket allocation for their Scottish Cup tie then will they also refuse the share of the gate they are entitled to? Aye that'll be right 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 According to everyone on P & B the 2 things are completely unconnected Well I, and some others, said that the two were related, but not synonymous, so don't make things up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.