Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

I guess we'll see, won't we?

Although something tells me that, in the event that the case goes against you this time, we'll miraculously discover that the courts are now somehow fallible and fragile, or maybe even riddled with anti-Rangers bias.

Is the runaway out of is bolt-hole? Is the disgraced bungler slightly less disgraceful? Is the IRA writer a messenger of peace these days?

What now for Hoggit, Snoggit and Floggit? Was their love the most fleeting of romances?

The wonderful world of plastics and diddies - wtf are they like.

laugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ooooh what a waste of tax payers money.....

The old rangers should know about how to waste taxpayers money, they wasted somewhere in the region of £93 million tongue.gif

But they cant appeal we have already won, its a vandetta i tell ye.....unsure.gif

If anyone thought the HMRC would not appeal against the cheats they must be totally delusional and have their heads buried in the sand........ oh wait blink.gif

Also the HMRC wont appeal if they are not confident of winning the case ohmy.gif

ph34r.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given they are hardly likely to gain much of anything from the oldco, I'd have thought you would be raging at their profligacy with the tax-payers money.

Given that they are seeking to establish that EBT payments of the type Rangers employed are taxable, then the potential benefit to the taxpayer clearly outweighs the cost of raising the action (which wouldn't be much more than £10k, even if that).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another serious misuse of public funds.

Will they recover any funds for HMRC? No. There is nothing left in the oldco for a dividend.

Will it set a precedent to go after other clubs? No. The original judgment means each case will be treated on merit and take months/years to resolve.

Has a point of law been breached with the original judgment? No one has yet noted any.

Are HMRC feeling embarrassed by this case and are seeking redress to cover this embarrassment? You decide...

The answer to the question in bold should be YES

A copy/paste from http://www.justice.gov.uk (didn't hide the link so that you can see it's not a tic wet dream blog)

There is also the public interest to consider. All revenue cases (including those of HM Revenue and Customs) have important precedent value that applies across the entire tax system, with implications for the Exchequer.

Remember MIH/Rangers did not appeal all cases and lost others, these will be rubber stamped by the Upper Tribunal as wins for HMRC - so win or lose the ones they are appealing, just by going to the Upper Tribunal HMRC have their precedent.

ETA a missing comma.

Edited by Kamenitza
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol: Must've been the final straw for HMRC, who have now appealed. Bendarroch's taunting took it too far. Enjoy!

Right, we've got The RTC blogger, Jum Spence, David Murray, Craig Whyte, Hector, Stuart Cosgrove, Turnbull Hutton, Irish Phil, Paul McConville, and now Bendarroch.

So come on, berrz, who did kill rangers? laugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the runaway out of is bolt-hole? Is the disgraced bungler slightly less disgraceful? Is the IRA writer a messenger of peace these days?

What now for Hoggit, Snoggit and Floggit? Was their love the most fleeting of romances?

The wonderful world of plastics and diddies - wtf are they like.

laugh.gif

Translation for non-orc speakers.

"Please can we change the subject. I dont want to talk about this anymore im scared"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and here we have it

HMRC ask for an appeal, they have not been granted that right nor have they won the appeal and by your reckoning Rangers are already guilty as charged, rather presumptuous aren't we? but also completely incorrect and irrelevant

The current judgment stands and is the reality (not what is inside your head), in the vast majority of cases Rangers were not guilty of tax evasion, in the vast majority of cases those were loans

1342551334865.jpg

Edited by WhiteRoseKillie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, we've got The RTC blogger, Jum Spence, David Murray, Craig Whyte, Hector, Stuart Cosgrove, Turnbull Hutton, Irish Phil, Paul McConville, and now Bendarroch.

So come on, berrz, who did kill rangers? laugh.giflaugh.giflaugh.gif

Pie and Bovril killed Rangers!!

Thats why theres more Orcs here than ever - Its the only show in town.

Orcs.....wit they like

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will any HMRC appeal put the SPL/SFA enquiry into dual contracts on hold?

Shouldn't have thought so - contrary to what some of the thicker posters on here the berrz appear to believe, the two issues are entirely separate - apart from the fact that the evidence given in the FTTT fairly hangs the cheating b*****ds in the sporting inquiry.

Happy Days - How's the share issue coming along, then?laugh.giflaugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...