Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

FAO hbqc gonnae translate this legal mumbo jumbo?

Thursday, 16 April 2015

Alleged Party in Breach: Rangers FC

Disciplinary Rule(s) allegedly breached:

Disciplinary Rule 1: All members shall:

(b) be subject to and comply with (i) the Articles (ii) this protocol.

(f) behave towards the Scottish FA and other members with the utmost good faith.

Disciplinary Rule 19: Except with the prior written consent of the Board: (a) no club or nominee of a club; and (b) no person, whether absolutely or as a trustee, either alone or in conjunction with one or more associates or solely through an associate or associates (even where such person has no formal interest), who: (i) is a member of a club; or (ii) is involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management or administration of a club, or (iii) has any power whatsoever to influence the management or administration or a club, may at the same time either directly or indirectly:- (a) be a member of another club; or (b) be involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management or administration of another club; or © have any power whatsoever to influence the management or administration of another club.

Outcomes:

Disciplinary Rule 1: Breach admitted. A fine of £5,000 was imposed.

Disciplinary Rule 19: Breach admitted. A fine of £500 was imposed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FAO hbqc gonnae translate this legal mumbo jumbo?

Thursday, 16 April 2015

Alleged Party in Breach: Rangers FC

Disciplinary Rule(s) allegedly breached:

Disciplinary Rule 1: All members shall:

(b) be subject to and comply with (i) the Articles (ii) this protocol.

(f) behave towards the Scottish FA and other members with the utmost good faith.

Disciplinary Rule 19: Except with the prior written consent of the Board: (a) no club or nominee of a club; and (b) no person, whether absolutely or as a trustee, either alone or in conjunction with one or more associates or solely through an associate or associates (even where such person has no formal interest), who: (i) is a member of a club; or (ii) is involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management or administration of a club, or (iii) has any power whatsoever to influence the management or administration or a club, may at the same time either directly or indirectly:- (a) be a member of another club; or (b) be involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management or administration of another club; or © have any power whatsoever to influence the management or administration of another club.

Outcomes:

Disciplinary Rule 1: Breach admitted. A fine of £5,000 was imposed.

Disciplinary Rule 19: Breach admitted. A fine of £500 was imposed

In terms an idiot like you might be able to understand , the current board have admitted(with prejudice :1eye ) that they don't want an investigation into the old board and if that old board were influenced by Mike Ashley :bag

edit to add that was for the £500 fine the other one was they were just admitting they tried to take the pish out of the SFA

Edited by accietilleyedye
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FAO hbqc gonnae translate this legal mumbo jumbo?

Thursday, 16 April 2015

Alleged Party in Breach: Rangers FC

Disciplinary Rule(s) allegedly breached:

Disciplinary Rule 1: All members shall:

(b) be subject to and comply with (i) the Articles (ii) this protocol.

(f) behave towards the Scottish FA and other members with the utmost good faith.

Disciplinary Rule 19: Except with the prior written consent of the Board: (a) no club or nominee of a club; and (b) no person, whether absolutely or as a trustee, either alone or in conjunction with one or more associates or solely through an associate or associates (even where such person has no formal interest), who: (i) is a member of a club; or (ii) is involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management or administration of a club, or (iii) has any power whatsoever to influence the management or administration or a club, may at the same time either directly or indirectly:- (a) be a member of another club; or (b) be involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management or administration of another club; or © have any power whatsoever to influence the management or administration of another club.

Outcomes:

Disciplinary Rule 1: Breach admitted. A fine of £5,000 was imposed.

Disciplinary Rule 19: Breach admitted. A fine of £500 was imposed

Loads of mentions of club in there, should it not be company? It's almost as if the whole club company separation thing was a, nah forget it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, if your team had been through what Rangers have they would have died and stayed dead.

The powers that be would not have cheated the rest of Scottish football by shoehorning an imitation tribute act version of QOS straight into the professional leagues.

The inevitable social unrest and Armageddon would have been more localised in Dumfriesshire with the odd loan wolf in far off places, like Falkirk. It wouldn't have got Regan excited.

Newcastle, surely?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FAO hbqc gonnae translate this legal mumbo jumbo?

Thursday, 16 April 2015

Alleged Party in Breach: Rangers FC

Disciplinary Rule(s) allegedly breached:

Disciplinary Rule 1: All members shall:

(b) be subject to and comply with (i) the Articles (ii) this protocol.

(f) behave towards the Scottish FA and other members with the utmost good faith.

Disciplinary Rule 19: Except with the prior written consent of the Board: (a) no club or nominee of a club; and (b) no person, whether absolutely or as a trustee, either alone or in conjunction with one or more associates or solely through an associate or associates (even where such person has no formal interest), who: (i) is a member of a club; or (ii) is involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management or administration of a club, or (iii) has any power whatsoever to influence the management or administration or a club, may at the same time either directly or indirectly:- (a) be a member of another club; or (b) be involved in any capacity whatsoever in the management or administration of another club; or © have any power whatsoever to influence the management or administration of another club.

Outcomes:

Disciplinary Rule 1: Breach admitted. A fine of £5,000 was imposed.

Disciplinary Rule 19: Breach admitted. A fine of £500 was imposed

Why are you asking me ?, shouldn't you be getting out your old enigma machine to decode it for you ???

It is pretty clear cut and concise, the club breached the SFA's rules and regulations and got fined, what's more to understand ?, other than it has depleted Sevco's finances by £5,500. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With pay day and the bills needing paid I expect some slight of hand with words coming from Gestapo HQ down Govan way.

If the 3 stooges stump up with the cash for this months bills I'll expect the club to issue a club statement proclaiming the good guys have given the club/company another £1.5 million in unsecured loans to help the club limp along into next month.

Or I'll expect after they have been forced to take the second tranche of the £10 million from SD they will not say anything or release anything at all. Nothing will be released period about how the bills this month were met. It will be business as usual with the P&B collective asking where and how did they get the cash to pay off the hounds at the door for this months bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are you asking me ?, shouldn't you be getting out your old enigma machine to decode it for you ???

It is pretty clear cut and concise, the club breached the SFA's rules and regulations and got fined, what's more to understand ?, other than it has depleted Sevco's finances by £5,500. :)

Cheers mate that really cleared it all up, you really know your stuff right enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Scottish Football Association is still waiting for evidence from Dave King to prove he passes the "fit and proper" test to become Rangers chairman, says SFA chief Stewart Regan.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/32338932

So it appears that it is now down to dodgy Dave to prove he is fit and proper to be The Rangers CEO, it appears the G&SL hasn't produced anything at all ?

I'm going to get extra popcorn in for the possible upcoming insolvency event about to take place at the end of the season that will see the club being sold off to pay for the RIFC's accumulated debts. This will see Ashley holding every asset the club owned when the holding company goes tits up.

So what will be left of the club come such an event ?, the club will be reduced to relevant association licences, players registrations & contracts and a shit load of paperwork of accounting and such, and that is it. This is what the club will be reduced to should the holding company go into administration, not worth much is it ? :lol:

Anyone willing to buy what is left of Rangers FC will have to do a deal with Ashley to still be The Rangers FC. :) Or has Ashley devised a master plan through some offshore method to own the club by proxy that no one can find who owns which company through the offshore maze of holding companies owned by holding companies through many offshore havens hindering any chance of knowing who owns what. :)

Well that's what I think anyhoo. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fighting confused the analogy somewhat. If it was a fight it would have been stopped long ago. It's more like "King and Potless Paul look on as Ashley and Green enjoy the spoils". :lol:

Yeh that works better :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Warchest timmy ..... warchest" ... :lol:

Be afraid Timmy, be very afraid.... we will return to the top and we'll see 10 IAR and the Champions League trophy coming back to Ibrox blah blah blah. :lol:

You two were claiming that the T word was sectarian not that long ago....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

someone posted a link to 'sevco media' somewhere was a tad bored so read a few threads... There was one about McCall not being the right manager to create a european challenging team :huh: wtf

its that thought pattern that they are just a whisker away from being above everyone but Celtic. I know its not exactly a great website to base opinion, but there is a general feel as someone has already pointed out of this dismissive attitude to other clubs bar the ugly sister. Sevco have made it to the play offs with and certainly i wouldn't part with a quid on them getting promoted. The concrete block of debt surrounds them again with so many haddies and hackers on the payroll, not to mention a club legend manager on 'gardening leave'. if they do scrape into the premiership top six looks like a mountain to far. There is plenty players out there that if well balanced could make a decent challange for top 6 but they are unlikely to be seen as 'good enough' for sevco. Sad for the real supporters but fun to laugh at the hangers on :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So King is not really cooperating with the 'fit and proper' process, while wishing to project that he is and that all is in order.

'Glib and shameless" truly is the perfect description of the man. Hats off to the South African judge.

Edited by Monkey Tennis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...