bennett Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 13 hours ago, Dundee Hibernian said: Tax avoidance and tax evasion are, to me, the same thing: cheating. Unfortunately, the law allows avenues for rich individuals and companies to avoid taxation which has the same result on the public purse as evasion. As an aside, everyone who evades tax isn't jailed. You'll be able to provide non Sevco examples of you comparing tax avoidance to cheating..... -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 45 minutes ago, Drew Brees said: Drew taking thickness to a whole new level. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aubrey Maturin Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 1 minute ago, bennett said: Drew taking thickness to a whole new level. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 Drew taking thickness to a whole new level. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 Just now, Tynierose said: You've included me in your banter, absolutely over the moon here. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 Vicky 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red23 Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 Sorry just had to post this again, it is so accurate and on point it's incredible. They just don't have the brain capacity or morals to step back and say "oh, we were wrong" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 17 minutes ago, red23 said: Sorry just had to post this again, it is so accurate and on point it's incredible. They just don't have the brain capacity or morals to step back and say "oh, we were wrong" Sectarian content, oh dear.... -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red23 Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 1 minute ago, bennett said: Sectarian content, oh dear.... Your club, old and new was founded on it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearthammer Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 The criteria that determine whether or not "penalties" are charged by HMRC depends very much on : The amount of the evasion/avoidance The nature (ie, type) of evasion/avoidance The background circumstances (ie, was bona fide professional advice sought) which strongly advised or sanctioned/endorsed the action taken resulting in the outstanding tax/NI charges. Any penalties are an additional sanction, over and above the established Tax/NI and non-negotiable interest calculated to the point at which the liabilities are settled. These are determined and are applied once the culpability and seriousness have been confirmed. HMRC will apply the penalties commensurate with the established position. However, if, like in this case, it is absolutely clear that the amounts likely to be recovered from the liquidated entity are minimal or negligible, HMRC will take steps to reduce or negate the penalties position where there is no expectation of recovering any or very little at most. This, however, does not affect the levels of Tax/NI/Interest due on the original charges and has no impact on the circumstances where the liabilities arose in the first place. The charges arose due to the sole and specific actions of the entity itself. Penalties applied by HMRC are additional, punitive measures applied subjectively depending on the specific circumstances. Similarly, HMRC can reduce or negate the same where there is little or no chance of recovery from the liquidated company and the remaining assets. Only sayin' like. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 1 hour ago, red23 said: Your club, old and new was founded on it. Wrong 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 37 minutes ago, Jacksgranda said: Wrong Correct. Only the new. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 10 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: Correct. Only the new. No, not even the new one. At least, not in signing/employment policy, which was always the accusation about the previous one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 3 minutes ago, Jacksgranda said: No, not even the new one. At least, not in signing/employment policy, which was always the accusation about the previous one. The accusations run deeper than that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 2 hours ago, red23 said: Your club, old and new was founded on it. The only sectarianism I'm seeing is coming from you. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 (edited) 34 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: The accusations run deeper than that. Because of the signing/employment policy their support was from one side of the community. It it hadn't been for said policy their support might have been more diverse. I don't think it will change much now, after all the Celtic support nearly consider themselves to be more Irish now than when they were formed. Edited November 16, 2019 by Jacksgranda sllepnig 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 On 14/11/2019 at 19:34, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said: Ticketus. It's all flooding back. So the quantum was around £56million? I've missed a good #Quantum. Whatever happened to Bill Ng by the way? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 (edited) https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/rangers-crisis-choosing-bill-miller-1120354 Quote “Miller plans to have a newco, Rangers 2012, playing in the SPL next season while the oldco – the Rangers which means so much to so many – is sitting on a shelf somewhere gathering dust and cobwebs, perhaps never to be seen again. Minter. Edited November 16, 2019 by Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red23 Posted November 16, 2019 Share Posted November 16, 2019 1 hour ago, bennett said: The only sectarianism I'm seeing is coming from you. Ah thats right it's an international gameweek, that'll be why. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.