Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

 

2 hours ago, The OP said:

I'm still in the 'Why did no-one notice this error in the intervening years and multitude of cases and who are these sensible investors who would've swooped in if the liability was a bit less' camp until I see something more solid than "accounting sources now believe". 

Absolutely, two stages of shite to this story. 1- it isn't true and 2- even if it was it wouldn't change anything. 

Accounting sources = bloke in pub. 

The corpse  of rangers was available for sale without any debt, courtesy of Duff and Phelps. It was looked at by the truck mannie and Bill Ng who both thought it was a shit business. No other buyers apart from bottom feeders.  Seems unlikely that £20m of tax bill would make it more of a prospect. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thistle_do_nicely said:

Didn't Craig Whyte literally stop sending HMRC any PAYE deductions collected by Rangers, which had little to nothing to do with either of the tax cases?

Around about 9 months worth but this might be some deflection tactic.

Close bothers are giving them the cold shoulder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 06/11/2019 at 22:31, Muzz1886 said:

With all due respect to you, salary % to turnover ratio isn't anywhere near as relevant as cash in the bank and net current assets. 

RFC have £25m net current liabilities and £1m in the bank.  That was in June. The accounts state that funding is needed right now - Nov19 is clearly quoted - with at least £10m needed between now and the end of the season. 

This is before taking into account further soft loans received since Jun-19 and shelling out another £11.5m on players.

There are numerous other things that should cause alarm - interest accrued on deferring transfers and numerous contingent liabilities being just two of them.

But hey, you beat bottom of the league Hearts in a Semi final, so life is good, right?

And they beat us 5-0, so Image result for image of cigar smoker

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been searching the internet hoping to find someone who obviously has a background in business taxation and no Old Firm agenda, who is prepared to look to the future and foresee possible implications for what today's revelations might hold in store that no-one yet has come up with.

Sadly, no joy on that front  but one poster on Rangers Banter has come up with this ---

 

 

 

Rangers_Banter.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of the anticipated tax bill is neither here or there. The club was a basket case and Murray was desperate to get rid.  For a £1 he sold it to a guy with riches off the scale according to the media. He then took his plunder and sent the club into administration and eventually liquidation. How many ex Rangers players to this day were compliant in creating  the tax bill and are now watching the new club? Those players were a big part of the demise.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even if this is correct and they only owed £20m to the tax man... there was also the other £18m they owed Lloyd’s.

I very much doubt that there were all these investors willing to take on £38m worth of debt with £18 being paid the second the contract was signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, steelmen said:

Even if this is correct and they only owed £20m to the tax man... there was also the other £18m they owed Lloyd’s.

I very much doubt that there were all these investors willing to take on £38m worth of debt with £18 being paid the second the contract was signed.

They borrowed from Ticketus to pay Lloyd’s...

So it would be 18m to Ticketus, about the same for Whyte not paying tax in his time, and then 20m for the tax bill that is being discussed again now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

..............a BDO spokesman said: “Since we published the last creditors report in June, BDO’s tax specialists have been negotiating with HMRC over the size of the tax bill.  There is no final decision, negotiations are ongoing and we expect a resolution of this in 2020”.

From article by ex Ibrox employee Roddy Forsyth

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said:

Lloyds is the banks.  Lloyd's is the insurance market.  

Shame you seldom posted when The Big Thread was at its height.  We missed the input from Clydebank fans...

Autocorrect on the phone old bean. I’ve spent the last 15 years working in finance and dealt with far too many entities answering to variations of that name, and should definitely have picked up on the mistake, but, alas, it slipped through.

I have plenty of posts on The Big Thread, more than I care to think about. The things we do when we should be working...

As for Clydebank, feel free to sign up to the trust and check my credentials. Not that I need to prove myself to anyone on that score.

Edited by Ross.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rangers were a horrible and utterly vile club, the weeks leading up to and ending with their demise were utterly fantastic.  Now the fans of a brand new club think the old team they supported was hard done by and it's even more delicious. Would be nice though if one of them, just one of them had mentioned in any post, tweet or message that they wished they had just played their bills, not tried tax dodges or not pretend for the last few years that they are the same club as the one they are all talking about today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Spring Onion said:

Rangers were a horrible and utterly vile club, the weeks leading up to and ending with their demise were utterly fantastic.  Now the fans of a brand new club think the old team they supported was hard done by and it's even more delicious. Would be nice though if one of them, just one of them had mentioned in any post, tweet or message that they wished they had just played their bills, not tried tax dodges or not pretend for the last few years that they are the same club as the one they are all talking about today. 

Right now, no one knows what's happening so I suggest that you dry your eyes.

 

817OWUY+v6L._SX679_.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Ross. said:

Autocorrect on the phone old bean. I’ve spent the last 15 years working in finance and dealt with far too many entities answering to variations of that name, and should definitely have picked up on the mistake, but, alas, it slipped through.

Not.  Lloyds for banking and Lloyd's for auld c***s like me who want to insure their tits against consequential loss.  Not that hard, really.  That you know about separate entities comes as no surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...