Jacksgranda Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 As what? The defence. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 The defence. As long as they don't sing "Panic" in front of Derek Johnstone. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desp Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Out of interest, when's the last time Sevco actually paid a transfer fee for a player? They shelled out about £800k for Templeton did they not, when they were in the 3rd Division? How's he getting on now? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 The Smiths to reform? Yes. Inspired by Dodgy Dave they've had a slight name change to The The $myths 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 They shelled out about £800k for Templeton did they not, when they were in the 3rd Division? How's he getting on now? 3 years older, I'd imagine. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Yes. Inspired by Dodgy Dave they've had a slight name change to The The $myths Rather cleverly done. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
accietilleyedye Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 They shelled out about £800k for Templeton did they not, when they were in the 3rd Division? How's he getting on now? 3 years older, I'd imagine. and a good bit wealthier 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 £1.5M so far has been reported. What happened to the £20/£30m he spoke of before? http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/32832070 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doink Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 What happened to the £20/£30m he spoke of before? http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/32832070 What happened to the £20/£30m he spoke of before? http://m.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/32832070 Statement of intent 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Statement of intent. AGM in tent. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 "It is a lot of nonsense. The shareholders cannot tell the board how to behave. The board would be under no obligation to take their advice." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 It'll all be fine. Dave and the rest of the boys are all real Rangers men. We should all just get back to being afraid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Very afraid. The bears are growling, don't forget. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 King has previously said he would be prepared to invest £30million in the club to put it back on an even keel with their Old Firm rivals. But so far all the Gers chief, who expects to appoint a manager next week, has handed over is a £1.5million unsecured loan. Patey, a partner with Ernst & Young, said: "Long term it's not a sustainable model for a club to spend more than it is making." A lot has been said about the wealth of Dave King. Can he continue to support it beyond one-year losses? I suspect he can but as yet, we have not seen a significant amount of money going into the club since Dave King took over." What? Really? Well, well, well. Financial expertise indeed. Patey, on the 'list' 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Diamond Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Can we stop using the port "invest" in these posts please, I looked it up in the online dictionary and it is probably the most inappropriate word to use when describing financial matters involving football clubs, never mind the Rangers invest ɪnˈvɛst/ verb verb: invest; 3rd person present: invests; past tense: invested; past participle: invested; gerund or present participle: investing 1. put (money) into financial schemes, shares, property, or a commercial venture with the expectation of achieving a profit. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Can we stop using the port "invest" in these posts please, I looked it up in the online dictionary and it is probably the most inappropriate word to use when describing financial matters involving football clubs, never mind the Rangers invest ɪnˈvɛst/ verb verb: invest; 3rd person present: invests; past tense: invested; past participle: invested; gerund or present participle: investing 1. put (money) into financial schemes, shares, property, or a commercial venture with the expectation of achieving a profit. One assumes this is exactly what Dave King means. A lie hidden in plain sight as a truth, wrapped in a mystery surrounded by a vast unwashed sea of gullibility. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Why do our idiot Journalists still court the opinion of Neil "the CVA will be accepted" Patey? The guys got a strike rate worse than McMadeupname 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 What mechanism exists to invest that £20m / £30m? You suggesting it's not that he won't put in the money he said he would, it's that he can't? Brilliant. What mechanism have changed since that original statement? No deflections please 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Was it Einstein who defined insanity as repeating the same actions over and over and expecting a different outcome? P&B bears are supposedly some of the most sensible but even they seem to balk at the idea of a basic reconciliation of income and expenditure. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted June 9, 2015 Share Posted June 9, 2015 Was it Einstein who defined insanity as repeating the same actions over and over and expecting a different outcome? P&B bears are supposedly some of the most sensible but even they seem to balk at the idea of a basic reconciliation of income and expenditure. I was thinking exactly this earlier. Their problem is that their expenditure is still utterly ludicrous. Which makes it impossible for them to actually run themselves properly. Until that's sorted out, they are gloriously fucked. What are the losses going to be for next season? 12 million? 20 million? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.