Henrik's tongue Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Sink us and we'll sink Prophetic banner thread for this pish. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 banners you say? No to Newco No to Liquidation Sink us and we'll sink yawn not this pish again, i hald up the red card to liquidation while being fully aware that it didnt mean new club, what you have here is evidence of rangers fans being against liquidation not evidence of us thinking that it meant new club, the usual pish from you lot because you dont have any actual credible evidence 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 #topbannertz At least make sure yeez hawd It the right way round this time ya pair of tits 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Rangers in court in two different countries today? Is this a world record? Such dignity. What a proud club. is 1 the company and the other the club? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 yawn not this pish again, i hald up the red card to liquidation while being fully aware that it didnt mean new club, what you have here is evidence of rangers fans being against liquidation not evidence of us thinking that it meant new club, the usual pish from you lot because you dont have any actual credible evidence What did it mean then? Why was it so worrysome to Rangers fans that they had to protest against it? I am pretty sure that the Sarver bid was primarily seen as killing the club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Second Andy Goram Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 What did it mean then? Why was it so worrysome to Rangers fans that they had to protest against it? I am pretty sure that the Sarver bid was primarily seen as killing the club. Because it meant we'd be in the third division. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 yawn not this pish again, i hald up the red card to liquidation while being fully aware that it didnt mean new club, what you have here is evidence of rangers fans being against liquidation not evidence of us thinking that it meant new club, the usual pish from you lot because you dont have any actual credible evidence Let them be , look at them and reliase this is what they have come to , fawning over some story regarding a wifi dispute regarding Rangers , this is what excites the diddies , their obsession comes from the fact that each and every one of the has probably been broken by our club at some point , the majority of supporters on this forum couldn't give two fucks about Rangers now and avoid this place at all costs , what we are left with is the broken and shattered souls whose life revolves around checking every Rangers related article . Best to just point , laugh , give a wry smile and remind them it's still 54 and counting 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Let them be , look at them and reliase this is what they have come to , fawning over some story regarding a wifi dispute regarding Rangers , this is what excites the diddies , their obsession comes from the fact that each and every one of the has probably been broken by our club at some point , the majority of supporters on this forum couldn't give two fucks about Rangers now and avoid this place at all costs , what we are left with is the broken and shattered souls whose life revolves around checking every Rangers related article . Best to just point , laugh , give a wry smile and remind them it's still 54 and counting Why don't Rangers just pay their fucking bills? Eveyone else has to ffs. Including you and me. They're a rid neck. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 yawn not this pish again, i hald up the red card to liquidation while being fully aware that it didnt mean new club, what you have here is evidence of rangers fans being against liquidation not evidence of us thinking that it meant new club, the usual pish from you lot because you dont have any actual credible evidence Retrospectively you all decided that liquidation didn't mean new club. Not before the event. Squeal in denial all you want. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 yawn not this pish again, i hald up the red card to liquidation while being fully aware that it didnt mean new club, what you have here is evidence of rangers fans being against liquidation not evidence of us thinking that it meant new club, the usual pish from you lot because you dont have any actual credible evidence Bore off, Nacho. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 What did it mean then? Why was it so worrysome to Rangers fans that they had to protest against it? I am pretty sure that the Sarver bid was primarily seen as killing the club. it meant losing our players for feck all, being booted out the top division etc this myth that we all thought liquidation meant new club at the time and all changed our minds when it happened is utter bullshite as there were plenty of articles around at the time outlining that this wouldnt be the case , like this one from nov 2011 http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/277115-what-happens-when-a-club-in-administration-sets-up-a-phoenix-company/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 (edited) Why don't Rangers just pay their fucking bills? Eveyone else has to ffs. Including you and me. They're a rid neck. I thought the social justice and defenders of all things pure celtic faithfull would be more worried about the actions of their own support over the weekend rather than an Internet bill down ibrox way Edited January 12, 2016 by forever_blue 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 it meant losing our players for feck all, being booted out the top division etc this myth that we all thought liquidation meant new club at the time and all changed our minds when it happened is utter bullshite as there were plenty of articles around at the time outlining that this wouldnt be the case , like this one from nov 2011 http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/277115-what-happens-when-a-club-in-administration-sets-up-a-phoenix-company/ OK. Stay then 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 Retrospectively you all decided that liquidation didn't mean new club. Not before the event. Squeal in denial all you want. bullshit as this article from 2011 proves, there was plenty of evidence available proving otherwise http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/277115-what-happens-when-a-club-in-administration-sets-up-a-phoenix-company/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nacho Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 OK. Stay then if you dont want to hear from rangers supporters stop posting in a special section about rangers - not rocket science is it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 I thought the social justice and defenders of all things pure celtic Yeah but I'm not one of them and Rangers are still a fucking rid neck. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
energyzone Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 bullshit as this article from 2011 proves, there was plenty of evidence available proving otherwise http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/277115-what-happens-when-a-club-in-administration-sets-up-a-phoenix-company/ What basically happened is that everyone was accepting Rangers were a new club until Charles Green realised not enough people were buying season tickets for what was commonly seen as a new entity. So he hammed up the 140 year history etc and the Rangers fans lapped it up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 if you dont want to hear from rangers supporters stop posting in a special section about rangers - not rocket science is it That's where I've been going wrong isn't it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 bullshit as this article from 2011 proves, there was plenty of evidence available proving otherwise http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/rangers/277115-what-happens-when-a-club-in-administration-sets-up-a-phoenix-company/ HMRC love Phoenix companies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wulliamwallace Posted January 12, 2016 Share Posted January 12, 2016 I hope everyone is stocking up on jelly and ice cream because the next few weeks is going to be very interesting entertaining Taken to court for non payment that goes back to Dec 2014,Blaming the company that supplied the wifi, whilst not paying the isp their bill.Claiming in court that the bill to Ashley has been paid yet again This lot should be expelled for running whilst insolvent, they don't have a fkn penny No credit line fkn lmao Who owns the title deeds ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.