Jump to content

whisky lovers


Recommended Posts

I've only tried the 15, but I must admit I was really surprised with how nice the Glenfarclas was in spite of a pretty cheap price.

Yeah only ever had a 12 of glenfarclas which was nice but this is miles ahead. An underrated distillery

attachicon.gifImageUploadedByPie & Bovril1465761599.340544.jpg

Had a couple of these tonight. Cost me under £20 at Bookers. Decent but nowhere near as good as Aberfeldy 12 year old.

Yeah spey cascade isnt a patch on tailfire for much the same price. Edited by gannonball
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dalmore 18yo is a cracking whisky.

 

Better than the next one up, the King IMO. The King has too many flavours going on at once, whereas the 18yo is a little more subtle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better than the next one up, the King IMO. The King has too many flavours going on at once, whereas the 18yo is a little more subtle.

Not a whisky expert by any stretch but I found that the 18yo had a real hint of chocolate orange about it, which made a real change to most the other types of whisky I've tried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Treated myself to a bottle of Glenlivet Nadurra whilst kettled at Stansted by Easy Jet tonight. Bloody flight delays always cost me in whisky. It has a wee burst of peat to it, very drinkable.

I wasn't sure about that one. For the price I thought it was a bit rough.

 

A wee Edradour Sauterne awaits me this weekend. Love a bit of Edradour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't sure about that one. For the price I thought it was a bit rough.

A wee Edradour Sauterne awaits me this weekend. Love a bit of Edradour.

The older batched, 16y.o is a fine dram, but there was a significant reduction in quality when they started the non age indicated version.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The older batched, 16y.o is a fine dram, but there was a significant reduction in quality when they started the non age indicated version.

Spot on. The older batched stuff is a bit pricey now though.

 

 

ETA: Think my Sauterne was £55ish for a 10 year old cask strength whisky.

Edited by killienick
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Poured some Fettercairn 6 y.o. Bottled from a cask that one of those whisky shops in the centre has. Just poured a glass. Can't say I'm that keen, but wondering if that's because it's so young compared to malts I'm used to drinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never tried anything that young. I imagine they taste pretty raw do they?

Tastes very alcoholy, really harsh tasting. Added a fair bit of water and its become a lot more drinkeable. I could imagine a 12 year old being quite nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poured some Fettercairn 6 y.o. Bottled from a cask that one of those whisky shops in the centre has. Just poured a glass. Can't say I'm that keen, but wondering if that's because it's so young compared to malts I'm used to drinking.

Have had some half decent cask strengths at 6 years old but in general they are pretty raw and firey and don't taste of much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...