Tamdunk Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 I'd imagine that the council would be somewhat implicated/responsible if there was a criminal conviction, rather than any sort of pull that he has himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 I thought the DVLA were going to charge him in Swansea where they can tell the Scottish courts to GTF, but it seems not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee Bully Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Did they not originally decide not to prosecute on the grounds of insufficient evidence before the fact that he'd lied on his medical records came to light? Surely they should be backing the private prosecution now that that information is public knowledge. There could be something in the suggestion of funny handshakes and rolled up trouser legs. Or there is just no reasonable chance of a prosecution. Done to death I know, but to be criminally liable, he would have to have known he was going to take an attach that day. He could be prosecuted for lying to the DVLA, but frankly a £50 fine or whatever isn't going to make anyone happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 I've also heard from a serving police officer that even if the private prosecution went ahead it would be fairly easy for Clarke's legal team to argue that he was not receiving a fair trial based on the amount of evidence that has been publicised during and since the FAI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 I've also heard from a serving police officer that even if the private prosecution went ahead it would be fairly easy for Clarke's legal team to argue that he was not receiving a fair trial based on the amount of evidence that has been publicised during and since the FAIManitowoc county will hold a fair trial for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 c**t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 Could the families still bring a civil case against him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 This should be a case now for social justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invergowrie arab Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 This should be a case now for social justice. A fair relationship between the individual and the state? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Man Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 One of the family's relatives should mount the kerb and wipe the c**t out. Preferably in a car they don't wish to ever use again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 We should take to the streets and smoke Harry Clarke out of what ever cave he is hiding in and demand he checks himself into barlinnie for at least a year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddieInDundee Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 This thread is beginning to read like one of those Facebook 'hang the b*****d' like and share posts. Having said that, he really is a slippery c**t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Man Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 This thread is beginning to read like one of those Facebook 'hang the b*****d' like and share posts. The fat c**t would snap the gallows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-35417384 Unfuckingbelievable!!! That not one of these pathetic c***s, who within hours of this tragedy unfolding, stated that Harry Clarke would not be prosecuted, can hold their hands up and admit they got it completely wrong. Scottish Law - Once the envy of the civilised world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-35417384 Unfuckingbelievable!!! That not one of these pathetic c***s, who within hours of this tragedy unfolding, stated that Harry Clarke would not be prosecuted, can hold their hands up and admit they got it completely wrong. Scottish Law - Once the envy of the civilised world. ^^^ Verge of tears Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted January 27, 2016 Share Posted January 27, 2016 This thread is beginning to read like one of those Facebook 'hang the b*****d' like and share posts. Having said that, he really is a slippery c**t. You make that sound like a bad thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
energyzone Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-35417384 Unfuckingbelievable!!! That not one of these pathetic c***s, who within hours of this tragedy unfolding, stated that Harry Clarke would not be prosecuted, can hold their hands up and admit they got it completely wrong. Scottish Law - Once the envy of the civilised world. What exactly do you want him prosecuted for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 What exactly do you want him prosecuted for? Causing death by dangerous driving would be a start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest honestrae95 Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-35417384 Unfuckingbelievable!!! That not one of these pathetic c***s, who within hours of this tragedy unfolding, stated that Harry Clarke would not be prosecuted, can hold their hands up and admit they got it completely wrong. Scottish Law - Once the envy of the civilised world. What a seething mess.There was no evidence at the time and there is still no evidence to prosecute him, therefore he cannot be prosecuted. If the Crown don't have evidence to prosecute, there's no chance that a family will have sufficient evidence to privately prosecute, so that has been correctly denied by the Lord Advocate. The Court will also deny the PP too. At no point was Clark told by any medical professional that there was a realistic chance that he could have another blackout and that is the crucial point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainspotter Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 Causing death by dangerous driving would be a start. He wasn't driving dangerously as he wasn't driving at all due to being unconscious. Other than that, sounds like a solid basis for prosecution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.