Jump to content

Yet another US shooting


Recommended Posts

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jun/18/us-mass-shootings-weekend

"At least 38 people were shot – including two fatally – in three different mass shootings reported Saturday and Sunday in separate parts of the US, according to officials.

One minor was killed and nine others were wounded in a shooting in a building in downtown St Louis, Missouri, about 1.45am Sunday, the local television station KMOV reported. The name of the slain victim wasn’t immediately available, and information on the conditions of the wounded wasn’t released right away either.

Meanwhile, at about 12.30am Sunday in Willowbrook, Illinois, 20 people were shot, including one who was killed, the local station WGN reported, citing officials. The slain victim in Willowbrook wasn’t immediately identified either."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Theroadlesstravelled said:

It’s always in a Democratic stronghold. They should really hand in their guns IMO.

6 hours ago, TxRover said:

WTF? 

2 hours ago, Theroadlesstravelled said:

I need more information to reply.

OK, then.

WTF are you on about? Better?

Forbes: Red states have higher gun death rates than blue states.

Stop parroting Republican propaganda and think for yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, BillyAnchor said:

Worth pointing out that many of those wounded probably will be bankrupt for life paying off the medical bills incurred when randomly shot. 

Another thing not covered by thoughts and prayers?

Oh well. Price of that sweet, sweet freedom baby

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, SlipperyP said:

More importantly, what is Juneteenth?

2 hours ago, carpetmonster said:

The anniversary of the day slavery was ended in the US.

Close, the anniversary of the day the Union commander in Galveston announced the Emancipation Proclamation…June 19, 1865 (hence Juneteenth)…a couple of months after Lee’s surrender and nearly three years after Lincoln proclaimed the slaves freed in rebel areas (but not occupied areas) on January 1, 1863. The actual full abolition of slavery was December 6, 1865, with the ratification of the 13th Amendment by three quarters of the States. Juneteenth has become a recognized Federal Holiday in recent years.

47 minutes ago, BillyAnchor said:

Worth pointing out that many of those wounded probably will be bankrupt for life paying off the medical bills incurred when randomly shot. 

Very unfortunately true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/06/2023 at 08:14, Bairnardo said:

Another thing not covered by thoughts and prayers?

Oh well. Price of that sweet, sweet freedom baby

I've wondered about this "thoughts and prayers" stuff. It really pisses me off.  What, exactly, IS covered by the "prayers"? What are those "praying" "praying" for? Presumably the countless previously sent thoughts and prayers following all the previous shootings had the square root of naff all effect on the ones since, yet still the thoughts and prayers trot out.

Unless they're prepared to make their Congress People's and Senators' lives miserable they're obviously not praying for more (any?) gun control. Get off the knees and start bombarding their offices with petitions, peters and emails. That'll have more chance of success than closing the eyes, raising their arms aloft and mumbling.

Are they "praying" to stop potential shooters - you know, the wrong sort of folk - getting guns?  Legislative action might have more impact, IMO.

Are they "praying" for the "souls" of the deceased? Eh? Do they think that their deity will be influenced about letting the deceased into "heaven" (or not) based on the quantity and quality of the prayers? Seems to me that these shootings must be just part of the deity's plan, so presumably these prayers are meaningless as the verdict on in/out of paradise was taken, without appeal, long before the shooting even took place. Qué Sera, Sera as Doris Day might have said.

Are they praying for the deceased's friends and relatives? It sounds laudable, but if so, what actual difference will the prayers make? The supposed recipients have no way of knowing about the prayers, how many there were and how sincere they were. I've long believed that praying "for" something after a terrible event is actually more for the benefit of person saying the prayer than for the supposed recipient. It allows them to think they're "doing something". They're really not.

Prayers after a tragedy like a tsunami or earthquake? Stuff that, send helicopters and antibiotics. The victims want to hear that help is on the way, not the sound of chanting and hearing of hippies spinning magic crystals in support of their plight.

Better to bin the prayers and get on the Congress People and Senators'. Until then, they'll presumably just have to get the next bout of "thoughts and prayers" ready. For all the good it has ever done.  Next time folk are minded to send "thoughts and prayers", which have the advantage of being cheap but are utterly useless in a practical sense, I'd suggest that instead they should send a donation to a charity trying to prevent similar future events or financially support pro-gun control candidates. Without real action the thoughts and prayers are just wasted breath.

Moan over. Until the next thoughts and prayers fiasco. Should be any day now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Salt n Vinegar said:

I've wondered about this "thoughts and prayers" stuff. It really pisses me off.  What, exactly, IS covered by the "prayers"? What are those "praying" "praying" for? Presumably the countless previously sent thoughts and prayers following all the previous shootings had the square root of naff all effect on the ones since, yet still the thoughts and prayers trot out.

Unless they're prepared to make their Congress People's and Senators' lives miserable they're obviously not praying for more (any?) gun control. Get off the knees and start bombarding their offices with petitions, peters and emails. That'll have more chance of success than closing the eyes, raising their arms aloft and mumbling.

Are they "praying" to stop potential shooters - you know, the wrong sort of folk - getting guns?  Legislative action might have more impact, IMO.

Are they "praying" for the "souls" of the deceased? Eh? Do they think that their deity will be influenced about letting the deceased into "heaven" (or not) based on the quantity and quality of the prayers? Seems to me that these shootings must be just part of the deity's plan, so presumably these prayers are meaningless as the verdict on in/out of paradise was taken, without appeal, long before the shooting even took place. Qué Sera, Sera as Doris Day might have said.

Are they praying for the deceased's friends and relatives? It sounds laudable, but if so, what actual difference will the prayers make? The supposed recipients have no way of knowing about the prayers, how many there were and how sincere they were. I've long believed that praying "for" something after a terrible event is actually more for the benefit of person saying the prayer than for the supposed recipient. It allows them to think they're "doing something". They're really not.

Prayers after a tragedy like a tsunami or earthquake? Stuff that, send helicopters and antibiotics. The victims want to hear that help is on the way, not the sound of chanting and hearing of hippies spinning magic crystals in support of their plight.

Better to bin the prayers and get on the Congress People and Senators'. Until then, they'll presumably just have to get the next bout of "thoughts and prayers" ready. For all the good it has ever done.  Next time folk are minded to send "thoughts and prayers", which have the advantage of being cheap but are utterly useless in a practical sense, I'd suggest that instead they should send a donation to a charity trying to prevent similar future events or financially support pro-gun control candidates. Without real action the thoughts and prayers are just wasted breath.

Moan over. Until the next thoughts and prayers fiasco. Should be any day now.

It just sounds more meaningful than actually saying "Insert platitude here"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Salt n Vinegar said:

I've wondered about this "thoughts and prayers" stuff. It really pisses me off.  What, exactly, IS covered by the "prayers"? What are those "praying" "praying" for? Presumably the countless previously sent thoughts and prayers following all the previous shootings had the square root of naff all effect on the ones since, yet still the thoughts and prayers trot out.

Unless they're prepared to make their Congress People's and Senators' lives miserable they're obviously not praying for more (any?) gun control. Get off the knees and start bombarding their offices with petitions, peters and emails. That'll have more chance of success than closing the eyes, raising their arms aloft and mumbling.

Are they "praying" to stop potential shooters - you know, the wrong sort of folk - getting guns?  Legislative action might have more impact, IMO.

Are they "praying" for the "souls" of the deceased? Eh? Do they think that their deity will be influenced about letting the deceased into "heaven" (or not) based on the quantity and quality of the prayers? Seems to me that these shootings must be just part of the deity's plan, so presumably these prayers are meaningless as the verdict on in/out of paradise was taken, without appeal, long before the shooting even took place. Qué Sera, Sera as Doris Day might have said.

Are they praying for the deceased's friends and relatives? It sounds laudable, but if so, what actual difference will the prayers make? The supposed recipients have no way of knowing about the prayers, how many there were and how sincere they were. I've long believed that praying "for" something after a terrible event is actually more for the benefit of person saying the prayer than for the supposed recipient. It allows them to think they're "doing something". They're really not.

Prayers after a tragedy like a tsunami or earthquake? Stuff that, send helicopters and antibiotics. The victims want to hear that help is on the way, not the sound of chanting and hearing of hippies spinning magic crystals in support of their plight.

Better to bin the prayers and get on the Congress People and Senators'. Until then, they'll presumably just have to get the next bout of "thoughts and prayers" ready. For all the good it has ever done.  Next time folk are minded to send "thoughts and prayers", which have the advantage of being cheap but are utterly useless in a practical sense, I'd suggest that instead they should send a donation to a charity trying to prevent similar future events or financially support pro-gun control candidates. Without real action the thoughts and prayers are just wasted breath.

Moan over. Until the next thoughts and prayers fiasco. Should be any day now.

Thoughts with and Prayers for the families, I guess?

Of course it's a good sentiment on the surface, but it is only ever used by pro-gun lobbies to make it seem like they care. They could save themselves the effort by amending the constitution and getting the Right to Bear Arms to f**k.

But who would ever do that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...