Carnoustie Young Guvnor Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, yoda said: Definitely the best bet we have the successor of NS. She has much more insight into how we can advance the cause of indy than NS whose only idea is to ask Boris nicely, and is a QC. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoustie Young Guvnor Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 32 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: You genuinely don't get it, do you? The defence pleaded consent on 3 of the charges - so he was talking about Salmond's behaviour. The line of defence was primarily that yes things had happened but what he had done was not illegal. Like Bill Clinton's consensual blowjob from Monica Lewinsky - it wasn't illegal but certainly wasn't appropriate. No it wasn't, there were 14 charges, AS admitted to one. All were dismissed, ergo they didn't happen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oneteaminglasgow Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 Joanna Cherry is an odious bigot. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoustie Young Guvnor Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, oneteaminglasgow said: Joanna Cherry is an odious bigot. Yeah totally man. You're a moron. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, Carnoustie Young Guvnor said: No it wasn't, there were 14 charges, AS admitted to one. All were dismissed, ergo they didn't happen. That's not how it works. None of the charges were dismissed. AS was found not guilty or not proven. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoustie Young Guvnor Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, Baxter Parp said: That's not how it works. None of the charges were dismissed. AS was found not guilty or not proven. Which means what? Was he guilty or innocent, according to the court? Take your time..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 1 minute ago, Carnoustie Young Guvnor said: Which means what? Was he guilty or innocent, according to the court? Take your time..... Innocent but touchy-feely IIRC. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jakedee Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 My wife,who worked as cabin crew on the Edinburgh to London flights,when I met her in the early 90's described Alex Salmond as a creepy sex pest then.He may have been found not guilty of the allegations against him, but he does have a history. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MONKMAN Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 Which means what? Was he guilty or innocent, according to the court? Take your time.....Not proven isn’t the same as not guilty. It means, we know you’re a creep but there isn’t enough evidence to convict. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 Pep isn't interested in anything other than his warped idiocy. There's no point. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 1 minute ago, MONKMAN said: Not proven isn’t the same as not guilty. It means, we know you’re a creep but there isn’t enough evidence to convict. Well, that's the perception but it has no legal difference whatsoever. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carnoustie Young Guvnor Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 1 minute ago, MONKMAN said: Not proven isn’t the same as not guilty. It means, we know you’re a creep but there isn’t enough evidence to convict. No it doesn't, it means we attempted to prove the charges against you using 200 police officers, interviewed 700 people and spent thousands of hours pursuing it, and were unable to do so. It also means we were unable to explicitly prove your innocence either, as its impossible to 'prove' in this context, so we find the charges not proven. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 Pep isn't interested in anything other than his warped idiocy. There's no point.This. An attention-seeking nutbag. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 Having looked at the "allegations" I can't see what the problem is. Who gives a shit if Sturgeon was told of the Salmond issue three days earlier than she recalled? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 Having looked at the "allegations" I can't see what the problem is. Who gives a shit if Sturgeon was told of the Salmond issue three days earlier than she recalled?Is smacks of utter desperation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANTAN Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 5 minutes ago, Baxter Parp said: Having looked at the "allegations" I can't see what the problem is. Who gives a shit if Sturgeon was told of the Salmond issue three days earlier than she recalled? Because it's apparant this wasn't some sudden recollection but rather a conscious act of deception. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SANTAN Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 36 minutes ago, Carnoustie Young Guvnor said: Definitely the best bet we have the successor of NS. She has much more insight into how we can advance the cause of indy than NS whose only idea is to ask Boris nicely, and is a QC. Someone said she hates the trans movement. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caledonian1 Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 17 minutes ago, jakedee said: My wife,who worked as cabin crew on the Edinburgh to London flights,when I met her in the early 90's described Alex Salmond as a creepy sex pest then. He may have been found not guilty of the allegations against him, but he does have a history. Really? What did he do? Did she report him? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 1 minute ago, Caledonian1 said: Really? What did he do? Did she report him? You don't have to meet someone to accurately assess their character. I remember my mum's reaction to seeing Jimmy Savile any time he was on the telly, for instance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted January 9, 2021 Share Posted January 9, 2021 8 minutes ago, Stormzy said: Someone said she hates the trans movement. FFS Stormy, have you not stirred up enough shit for 1 day? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.