Jump to content

Andy Murray The Greatest and General Tennis Chat


Bryan

Recommended Posts

BBC reporting protests in Belgrade.

His old man seems a right laugh.  Complaining about the hotel conditions, saying they're shite.  Also saying if they didn't want him there they could have told him not to come and it would have been fine.

Seems to me like he's in the hotel because of his own doing.  If he didn't appeal the decision he could have got on the next plane home instead of being parked up in the quarantine jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, peasy23 said:

 https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/jan/06/novak-djokovic-to-challenge-australian-visa-cancellation-in-federal-court
That doesn’t say that he wouldn't get in though, only that he wouldn't get quarantine free entry.

Of course, but he's not wanting to be in a hotel room for two weeks before the tournament. 

All seems fairly simple to me for entry to Aus - vaccinated or medical exemption (prior Covid in the last 6 months doesn't count for the latter, as communicated to Tennis Australia by the federal government). Unless he's changed his mind on vaccines then he seems to have turned up with nothing to prove an exemption (some suggestions of a TA letter).

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/why-novak-djokovic-s-visa-was-rejected-20220106-p59m9a.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, peasy23 said:

He must have been really unlucky then, as he tested positive in June, which was more than 6 months ago. Has he had it again since?

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/jun/23/novak-djokovic-tests-positive-for-covid-19-amid-adria-tour-fallout

That's maybe the discrepancy in his application for exemption. Having seen his old man earlier, I'd just keep him in the hotel he's in for another few days to really wind the daft cùnt up - what a rocket that boy is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HTG said:

That's maybe the discrepancy in his application for exemption. Having seen his old man earlier, I'd just keep him in the hotel he's in for another few days to really wind the daft cùnt up - what a rocket that boy is. 

If the da’s a rocket the ma’s a solid fuel rocket booster.

They’re probably royalty at home because prisoner cell djock h is the only star the country has ever produced but they need to stop believing their own press.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's maybe the discrepancy in his application for exemption. Having seen his old man earlier, I'd just keep him in the hotel he's in for another few days to really wind the daft cùnt up - what a rocket that boy is. 
As was posted further up though, it was made clear that prior positive tests, regardless of when they had happened, would make no difference to a players vaccination status.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think anybody comes out of this with much credit to be honest (except maybe Nadal). Djokovic is clearly a self entitled fruit loop who expects rules to be bent for him to do as he chooses. He's free to choose not to have a vaccine if he wishes. He's then got to deal with the consequences for international travel and not expect to be free to go where he wishes. I sincerely hope the French, UK and US Govts do the same for the other majors.

However, the Aussies have handled this appallingly. Djokovic's vaccine scepticism is not a surprise and the fact he had been granted some sort of tournament exemption by the Victorian Govt was well known as he announced it himself. The national Govt and the state one don't seem able to coherently agree a policy, largely because the national one has performed a 360 degree backflip on the issue since finally reading the room in respect of public opinion. Scott Morrison must have a neck entirely made of brass as he tries to claim credit for a hard stance about 15 minutes after claiming it was a matter for the Victorian State legislators to decide.

The tournament organisers and State Govt appear on the face of it to have basically lifted their skirts to Novax and asked how far he'd like them to bend over. It's not a good look, although if it's correct that the exemptions were granted based on anonymous medical data then I've some sympathy for them. I've no doubt commercial aspects of the No 1 player's presence were a bigger factor than anything else though. The Indian Junior boy being denied entry because his country don't authorise vaccines for u18's yet is a far better case for an exemption than someone who consciously chooses to ignore medical advice.

Nadal hit the nail on the head earlier this week. Djokovic can choose what he likes but he has to accept the consequences of it. And whilst the Aussies could have handled this much better, he's in a quarantine hotel because he chose not to get vaccinated and chose not to turn round and go home when that was made clear. This could only get more stupid if he actually wins his legal appeal. Which would possibly be funnier. Are there crowds at the Aussie Open? If there are there's bound to be very little support for him there.

Edited by Skyline Drifter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think anybody comes out of this with much credit to be honest (except maybe Nadal). Djokovic is clearly a self entitled fruit loop who expects rules to be bent for him to do as he chooses. He's free to choose not to have a vaccine if he wishes. He's then got to deal with the consequences for international travel and not expect to be free to go where he wishes. I sincerely hope the French, UK and US Govts do the same for the other majors.
However, the Aussies have handled this appallingly. Djokovic's vaccine scepticism is not a surprise and the fact he had been granted some sort of tournament exemption by the Victorian Govt was well known as he announced it himself. The national Govt and the state one don't seem able to coherently agree a policy, largely because the national one has performed a 360 degree backflip on the issue since finally reading the room in respect of public opinion. Scott Morrison must have a neck entirely made of brass as he tries to claim credit for a hard stance about 15 minutes after claiming it was a matter for the Victorian State legislators to decide.
The tournament organisers and State Govt appear on the face of it to have basically lifted their skirts to Novax and asked how far he'd like them to bend over. It's not a good look, although if it's correct that the exemptions were granted based on anonymous medical data then I've some sympathy for them. I've no doubt commercial aspects of the No 1 player's presence were a bigger factor than anything else though. The Indian Junior boy being denied entry because his country don't authorise vaccines for u18's yet is a far better case for an exemption than someone who consciously chooses to ignore medical advice.
Nadal hit the nail on the head earlier this week. Djokovic can choose what he likes but he has to accept the consequences of it. And whilst the Aussies could have handled this much better, he's in a quarantine hotel because he chose not to get vaccinated and chose not to turn round and go home when that was made clear. This could only get more stupid if he actually wins his legal appeal. Which would possibly be funnier. Are there crowds at the Aussie Open? If there are there's bound to be very little support for him there.
As one government minister said in reply to Maw and Paw Djokovic, he isn't being held captive, he can go to the airport and get on a plane any time he likes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, peasy23 said:
2 hours ago, Skyline Drifter said:
Don't think anybody comes out of this with much credit to be honest (except maybe Nadal). Djokovic is clearly a self entitled fruit loop who expects rules to be bent for him to do as he chooses. He's free to choose not to have a vaccine if he wishes. He's then got to deal with the consequences for international travel and not expect to be free to go where he wishes. I sincerely hope the French, UK and US Govts do the same for the other majors.
However, the Aussies have handled this appallingly. Djokovic's vaccine scepticism is not a surprise and the fact he had been granted some sort of tournament exemption by the Victorian Govt was well known as he announced it himself. The national Govt and the state one don't seem able to coherently agree a policy, largely because the national one has performed a 360 degree backflip on the issue since finally reading the room in respect of public opinion. Scott Morrison must have a neck entirely made of brass as he tries to claim credit for a hard stance about 15 minutes after claiming it was a matter for the Victorian State legislators to decide.
The tournament organisers and State Govt appear on the face of it to have basically lifted their skirts to Novax and asked how far he'd like them to bend over. It's not a good look, although if it's correct that the exemptions were granted based on anonymous medical data then I've some sympathy for them. I've no doubt commercial aspects of the No 1 player's presence were a bigger factor than anything else though. The Indian Junior boy being denied entry because his country don't authorise vaccines for u18's yet is a far better case for an exemption than someone who consciously chooses to ignore medical advice.
Nadal hit the nail on the head earlier this week. Djokovic can choose what he likes but he has to accept the consequences of it. And whilst the Aussies could have handled this much better, he's in a quarantine hotel because he chose not to get vaccinated and chose not to turn round and go home when that was made clear. This could only get more stupid if he actually wins his legal appeal. Which would possibly be funnier. Are there crowds at the Aussie Open? If there are there's bound to be very little support for him there.

As one government minister said in reply to Maw and Paw Djokovic, he isn't being held captive, he can go to the airport and get on a plane any time he likes.

The most interesting thing here is that presumably Maw and Paw Djokovic ARE full vaccinated or they wouldn't have got in themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, die hard doonhamer said:

His parents are still in Belgrade

Sorry, misunderstood when it said the rest of his entourage had been allowed entry. Didn't appreciate they weren't in it. Plus they were pictured at a press conference earlier with the trophy but presumably that's a replica he has in Belgrade.

Edited by Skyline Drifter
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So cynical. Just cause he’s had covid twice and his most recent attempt ensured that he’d be within the 28 day period you’re not medically recommended to have the jag for the tournament.

Guess an antibody test would prove that eh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Djokovic basically turning himself into the epitome of "DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?" is going to pretty much lose him support from everyone apart from Serbians and nutcase anti-vaxxers who will have him as their poster boy. It will be funny to see him roundly booed at virtually every tournament he takes part in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There seems to be a discrepancy between what is required to be allowed to play in the tournament, and what is required to enter the country. The Australian Border Force love being dicks (ironic considering the prison ships etc), but to be fair to them, they stick to their rules.

A guy I used to work with competed in the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne in 2006 - he was nearly refused entry because he was accused of importing food, which happened to be the free peanuts from the plane. If they were that strict with that, it's no surprise they are stopping folk who can't prove they aren't importing a virus.

Also, GIRFUY Novak

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You don't have to agree with the rules and regulations or exemptions to agree with if it applies to everyone then that includes Novak. Plenty of sports people have been refused entry into UK and other countries including Maradona at one point and darts players but not as high profile as this case. The tournament or sport doesn't dictate visa requirements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mark Connolly said:

A guy I used to work with competed in the Commonwealth Games in Melbourne in 2006 - he was nearly refused entry because he was accused of importing food, which happened to be the free peanuts from the plane. If they were that strict with that, it's no surprise they are stopping folk who can't prove they aren't importing a virus.

The Incoming Passenger Card does clearly ask, amongst other things, “Are you bringing into Australia …… 7. Grains, seeds, bulbs, straw, nuts ….  Yes or No”. Easiest thing is select yes and tell them what it is and they’ll just wave you through. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...