BFTD Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Some absolutely rapey tips on his "bang" page here http://www.bangguides.com/game/bang/ The worst of the lot for me was " Seven very detailed steps to taking off her clothes that includes tactics to fight any late-minute resistance she might throw at you." Sounds rapey as f**k Like all of these things, it comes across as a guide on how to pretend to be human, written for aliens who require access to genitals to replenish their life force. I'd imagine a psychopath's guide to cornering murder victims wouldn't be a whole lot different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostin' Kev Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Never heard of him before but the boy sounds like a bit of a character, might head along for this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 The Scottish events are cancelled billy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Never heard of him before but the boy sounds like a bit of a character, might head along for this.Then up the dancin'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostin' Kev Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 The Scottish events are cancelled billy FFS was starting to warm to this guys ideals, will probably have to travel now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KnightswoodBear Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 FFS was starting to warm to this guys ideals, will probably have to travel now. banana's weekend has freed up. You could head out on the pull together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 FFS was starting to warm to this guys ideals, will probably have to travel now.Maybe he will be back for fringe time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenconner Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Knew this would end in tears once the SDL/true blue/fash types joined to protest against him. SDL said something about him being a Muslim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invergowrie arab Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 What was he satirising by saying a woman can not be raped on private property? It's really not clear. Satire seems to be the new "fishing" as a catch all for acting the c**t and being called out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostin' Kev Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Was thinking that myself, might start using that as a caveat after saying whatever the f**k I want basically. Bit like Warburton and his use of the word respectfully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I wonder if he believes in the logic that if a women consents once then you have rights to her when ever you want in future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hk blues Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 What was he satirising by saying a woman can not be raped on private property? It's really not clear. Satire seems to be the new "fishing" as a catch all for acting the c**t and being called out. Not sure but maybe he was on about US laws where shooting somebody on private property is more likely to be ok than on public property? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Not sure but maybe he was on about US laws where shooting somebody on private property is more likely to be ok than on public property? I really don't think there is a comparison. Anyone who tries to excuse this guy in any way by any 'interpretation' of what he says is tragic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Pete Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 Not sure but maybe he was on about US laws where shooting somebody on private property is more likely to be ok than on public property? I really don't think there is a comparison. Anyone who tries to excuse this guy in any way by any 'interpretation' of what he says is tragic. I think he meant rapes on private property are OK as long as they're in self-defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hk blues Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I really don't think there is a comparison. Anyone who tries to excuse this guy in any way by any 'interpretation' of what he says is tragic. It's not, as different as different can be. But in the land of the free he's entitled to say it. I agree that it's well nigh impossible to say anything in his defence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I think he meant rapes on private property are OK as long as they're in self-defence. Oh, self-defence rapes? He should have made that clearer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hk blues Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 I think he meant rapes on private property are OK as long as they're in self-defence. That's a much clearer way to say what I was trying to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Pete Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 For clarity, I was just trying to make a joke there. I wasn't for a second trying to explain this character or his odd views. I've never heard of the c**t before now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invergowrie arab Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 My understanding is his point is women ( he never refers to male rape) are responsible for themselves. If they get dragged into a bush and raped in a park that's terrible. If they go to someone's private home for dinner and the host decides to brutally penetrate them causing horrific genital trauma and lifelong psychological damage its their own stupid fault for being so credulous. However, now I have learned this viewpoint is all just bantz and witty satire. Somehow somewhere some 4th wave feminist has been confronted with their own prejudice by this. I have to admit it's all a bit beyond me how that works and I have absolutely been whooshed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted February 4, 2016 Share Posted February 4, 2016 My understanding is his point is women ( he never refers to male rape) are responsible for themselves. If they get dragged into a bush and raped in a park that's terrible. If they go to someone's private home for dinner and the host decides to brutally penetrate them causing horrific genital trauma and lifelong psychological damage its their own stupid fault for being so credulous. However, now I have learned this viewpoint is all just bantz and witty satire. Somehow somewhere some 4th wave feminist has been confronted with their own prejudice by this. I have to admit it's all a bit beyond me how that works and I have absolutely been whooshed. Banter all over the place with this lad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.