Jump to content

General Politics Thread


Granny Danger

Recommended Posts

UN security meeting on now, I find it hard to listen to the US representative, it sounds like she's reading to a Primary 3 class.

...once upon a time..Russia backed nasty Asssaaaaad...they used chemical weapoooonnnss....

Edited by Jdog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jdog said:

What will the narrative be when the opcw inspectors say there was no CW attack in Doumas?

After a week it is likely there will be nothing to discover. Evaporation, bit of bleach and hiding the bodies would be enough within 48 hours. Unless some of the victims have survived on the evacuation, but still unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, SweeperDee said:

Toxin wasn’t Novichok; but instead a toxin called BZ. Not produced in Russia. Neutral Swiss chemical lab Spiez has verified this.

RT :lol:  https://www.rt.com/news/424149-skripal-poisoning-bz-lavrov/

Edited by NewBornBairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, SweeperDee said:

Toxin wasn’t Novichok; but instead a toxin called BZ. Not produced in Russia. Neutral Swiss chemical lab Spiez has verified this.

 

4 hours ago, NewBornBairn said:

https://twitter.com/SpiezLab/status/985243574123057152

https://www.nzz.ch/international/kein-zweifel-am-nowitschok-resultat-ld.1374775

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Zetterlund said:

Good old neutral Swiss, not confirming or denying so as not to piss off either side. Everyone is being very careful with their language in this case.

The individual labs aren't supposed to comment in detail. The worrying thing is that Lavrov knows he can get away with spouting such easily disprovable tosh as enough people will believe anything coming out of the Kremlin, even if they contradict themselves day after day.

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, welshbairn said:

The individual labs aren't supposed to comment in detail. The worrying thing is that Lavrov knows he can get away with spouting such easily disprovable tosh as enough people will believe anything coming out of the Kremlin.

If it's easily disprovable then I'm sure someone will be along to disprove it shortly. The Swiss lab need only have responded that Lavrov has made this up and they found no such thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

The individual labs aren't supposed to comment in detail. The worrying thing is that Lavrov knows he can get away with spouting such easily disprovable tosh as enough people will believe anything coming out of the Kremlin, even if they contradict themselves day after day.

You know you could replace the name Lavrov with Johnson and Kremlin with Westminster and your statement would be just as true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Antiochas III said:

You know you could replace the name Lavrov with Johnson and Kremlin with Westminster and your statement would be just as true.

Exactly, and the British have already been caught lying on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...