Jump to content

Brexit slowly becoming a Farce.


John Lambies Doos

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, O'Kelly Isley III said:
3 hours ago, Sooky said:
FWIW, I think this Common Market 2.0 motion laid by Nick Boles is the proposal that is fairest in recognising the fact that the nation voted leave by a margin of 52/48.

IMG_6583.thumb.jpg.c6be7db9d8e8cb72e0f5b2af2acdf8e4.jpg

We leave the EU, but maintain close alignment. I’m pretty sure a Norway type deal like this means leaving the Common Agricultural Policy, Fisheries Policy, and the Court of Justice.

 

After almost three years of omnishambles that 52/48 margin is well past its sell-by date.

 

As the PM at the time said this is a once in a Generation Vote.

Three years is not once in a Generation.

This we were promised. We hold tgem to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the PM at the time said this is a once in a Generation Vote.
Three years is not once in a Generation.
This we were promised. We hold tgem to it.
You really are a piss poor troll.

Or you really are that thick that you can't understand that being out of the EU is not the same as being out of the Single Market and Customs Union.

Probably the latter going by the racist gammons I've met.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've checked with the time lords and it just so happens that February 2019 was the end of the last generation and March 2019 was the start of the new one. That's a relief, because otherwise (as a nation) we were going to self-harm based upon an (apparently legally binding) vague term used in a leaflet. 

Edited by The OP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've checked with the time lords and it just so happens that February 2019 was the end of the last generation and March 2019 was the start of the new one. That's a relief, because otherwise (as a nation) we were going to self-harm based upon an (apparently legally binding) vague term used in a leaflet. 
Too late, as a nation we self harmed in 2014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:

It’s being reported in the Independent that Labour will support a confirmatory referendum.  Huge news if true.

 

Barry Gardiner says they don’t support it, Tom Watson says they do, Labour HQ say no decision taken yet.

Useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Londonwell said:

Barry Gardiner says they don’t support it, Tom Watson says they do, Labour HQ say no decision taken yet.

Useless.

That's what's called keeping your options open...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Granny Danger said:

It’s being reported in the Independent that Labour will support a confirmatory referendum.  Huge news if true.

 

I notice the proposal doesn't mention May's deal, that might get a little bit more support.

There's 62 votes for it with SNP + Plaid + Lib Dems + Independent Group. 320 needed for a majority so you'd really need the entirety of Labour's 245 votes and then 13 rebel Tories.

I think that even if the Labour leadership back it, it's a tough ask to get over the line as the odds are that they won't have control over their own MPs and Tories will be worried about ending their career by attaching their name to it.

The only way I think it can pass is if MPs are encouraged to abstain instead of voting against.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, doulikefish said:

The amount of times this may happen is now on par with fluffy resigning

I am living in hope that at some point Labour will a) finally realise that they have to do something; and b) realise what the vast majority of their supporters and members want.

Whilst the Tories might be all over the place on Brexit the majority of their MPs are doing what they think Tory voters want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, harry94 said:

I notice the proposal doesn't mention May's deal, that might get a little bit more support.

There's 62 votes for it with SNP + Plaid + Lib Dems + Independent Group. 320 needed for a majority so you'd really need the entirety of Labour's 245 votes and then 13 rebel Tories.

I think that even if the Labour leadership back it, it's a tough ask to get over the line as the odds are that they won't have control over their own MPs and Tories will be worried about ending their career by attaching their name to it.

The only way I think it can pass is if MPs are encouraged to abstain instead of voting against.

I think you’re right and this is going to come down to the likes of Hoey, Mann, et al who will f**k things up with a smile on their faces.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, harry94 said:

I notice the proposal doesn't mention May's deal, that might get a little bit more support.

There's 62 votes for it with SNP + Plaid + Lib Dems + Independent Group. 320 needed for a majority so you'd really need the entirety of Labour's 245 votes and then 13 rebel Tories.

I think that even if the Labour leadership back it, it's a tough ask to get over the line as the odds are that they won't have control over their own MPs and Tories will be worried about ending their career by attaching their name to it.

The only way I think it can pass is if MPs are encouraged to abstain instead of voting against.

The Tories might be more likely to go for it if Labour don't whip it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...