welshbairn Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 2 minutes ago, Detournement said: And the point of the MIT report is that the OAS - right wing ghouls that they are - invented the problems with the early reporting. No, you're cherry picking one piece of disagreement to confirm your prejudices. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 The early results were the justification for the coup. MIT have said the early results have no irregularities. It's not complicated unless you are a sad case looking for a pointless argument. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thane of Cawdor Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 8 hours ago, Detournement said: The early results were the justification for the coup. MIT have said the early results have no irregularities. It's not complicated unless you are a sad case looking for a pointless argument. Which you, demonstrably, are. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 Ridiculous reporting by the BBC on Biden's projected win in South Carolina - it would be a major shock if he didn win there.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51693714 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 Ridiculous reporting by the BBC on Biden's projected win in South Carolina - it would be a major shock if he didn win there.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-51693714Yes, the analysis below doesn’t really back up the lede of that article, does it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 "Hidden servers that altered the results" They haven't disproven because you can't disprove abstract nonsense but it seems like the onus is more on the accusers to prove it happened. No one has disproven that Fred Durst was behind 9/11 either. Did you just google popular music of the early 00's and come up with Fred Durst? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 Yes, the analysis below doesn’t really back up the lede of that article, does it? ITV news reporting the same shite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 It’s California or bust for Biden. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 With Steyer dropping out despite coming "best of the rest", could be Biden v Sanders after Tuesday. Hopefully it's settled before the end of March, Trump will love it if it's a circular gunfight right up till the convention, the Dems doing all his oppo research and character assassination for him, allowing him to stand back and look, dare I say it, almost statesmanlike. Tuesday's the big test for Bloomberg's attempt to buy the nomination too, if all he gets is single figures he might cut his losses. 538 reckons Sanders will do well, the graph below shows their estimate of his chances of winning in each state, not % of vote/delegates. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 With Steyer dropping out despite coming "best of the rest", could be Biden v Sanders after Tuesday. Hopefully it's settled before the end of March, Trump will love it if it's a circular gunfight right up till the convention, the Dems doing all his oppo research and character assassination for him, allowing him to stand back and look, dare I say it, almost statesmanlike. Tuesday's the big test for Bloomberg's attempt to buy the nomination too, if all he gets is single figures he might cut his losses. 538 reckons Sanders will do well, the graph below shows their estimate of his chances of winning in each state, not % of vote/delegates. It would behoove Buttigieg to withdraw and back Biden. Were I in the centrist faction on the Democrats, I’d implore him not to run on Super Tuesday. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 5 minutes ago, MixuFixit said: Bloomberg doing a great job of taking votes off Biden which I suspect was not the plan. According to this it could be. And to spend, spend, spend all the way to a brokered convention. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/02/20/bloomberg-brokered-convention-strategy-116407 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 How accountable are the DNC officials and how easily could they be removed if they usurp the wishes of ordinary members/supporters? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 No idea why he’s going after Bloomberg. Bloomberg is going to drop out soon enough. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 5 hours ago, MixuFixit said: Astonishing numbers for Buttigieg given the coverage he's received. Bloomberg doing a great job of taking votes off Biden which I suspect was not the plan. Rat emojis get the job done. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 With Steyer dropping out despite coming "best of the rest", could be Biden v Sanders after Tuesday. Hopefully it's settled before the end of March, Trump will love it if it's a circular gunfight right up till the convention, the Dems doing all his oppo research and character assassination for him, allowing him to stand back and look, dare I say it, almost statesmanlike. Tuesday's the big test for Bloomberg's attempt to buy the nomination too, if all he gets is single figures he might cut his losses. 538 reckons Sanders will do well, the graph below shows their estimate of his chances of winning in each state, not % of vote/delegates. Bernie has some great numbers in some big f**k off states. And vermont might just go his way as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 Utah's interesting, wouldn't have expected Bernie to have a big following there. Could be some GOP shenanigans going on though.. https://www.deseret.com/utah/2020/2/28/21157823/donald-trump-bernie-sanders-super-tuesday-primary-republican-democrat-utah 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genuine Hibs Fan Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 3 hours ago, NotThePars said: As always Donnie is a rock solid insult comic. Less said about the rest the better etc etc. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 3 minutes ago, Genuine Hibs Fan said: As always Donnie is a rock solid insult comic. Less said about the rest the better etc etc. Funniest bit was him waiting for his plants to kick off the "4 more years" chant. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 CNN trying to paint Biden’s totally foreseeable win in South Carolina as a turning point in his disastrous campaign. Desperate stuff. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.