MONKMAN Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 The President of the United States of America. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killiepiemuncher Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 Nobody knows more about Infectious contagious diseases than Donald J Trump. Nobody. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandyCromarty Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 Take a look at Bloombergs TV ad on Bernie Sanders gun control record. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted February 26, 2020 Share Posted February 26, 2020 4 hours ago, killiepiemuncher said: Nobody knows more about Infectious contagious diseases than Donald J Trump. Nobody. Trump said the other day that they were close to a vaccine for the coronavirus. The WH then had to confirm later on that they were close to a cure for ebola not the cornonavus. Trump 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theroadlesstravelled Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 We're more than 3 years into the Trump tenure and people are still shocked that he says daft shite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandyCromarty Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 8 hours ago, Theroadlesstravelled said: We're more than 3 years into the Trump tenure and people are still shocked that he says daft shite. Correct, the problem is that a great majority of the American people treat it as the gospel truth. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 (edited) They clearly don't. In real terms only about 23% of American citizens voted for him in 2016 and a quarter of his supporters didn't even like him as a candidate they just liked Hillary less. Edited February 27, 2020 by Detournement 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandyCromarty Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 Political Polls@Politics_Polls National GE: Bernie Sanders 47% (+7) Donald Trump 40%@Reuters/@Ipsos 2/19-25https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN20J2J9?__twitter_impression=true … 5,049 20:48 - 25 Feb 2020 On the 8th of Nov 2016, the day of the Presidential Election, the BBC published a poll which clearly showed Hilary Clinton well ahead and a clear favourite. Hilary stood at 48% and Daft Donnie was at 44%. What Happened? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trainspotter Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 44 minutes ago, SandyCromarty said: What Happened? Clinton got 48%, Trump got 46% and the Electoral College did the rest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandyCromarty Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 (edited) 26 minutes ago, trainspotter said: Clinton got 48%, Trump got 46% and the Electoral College did the rest. Hilary got the popular vote but the EC State vote went to Trump giving him the Presidency. George W Bush won but lost the popular vote and he got two terms. And he was another inarticulate clown. Putin had a lot of votes which he used to get Trump in behind the Grassy Knoll????????? My point was that polls cannot be trusted completely. Edited February 27, 2020 by SandyCromarty 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 Hilary got the popular vote but the EC State vote went to Trump giving him the Presidency. George W Bush won but lost the popular vote and he got two terms. And he was another inarticulate clown. Putin had a lot of votes which he used to get Trump in behind the Grassy Knoll????????? My point was that polls cannot be trusted completely.Sanders’s campaign has made a point of campaigning on regardless of what the polls say. It was Clinton’s campaign that was stopping activists from travelling to swing states because Robbie Mook’s algorithms were claiming they’d got over the line. So your point has already been long acknowledged by the front runner candidate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 Hilary got the popular vote but the EC State vote went to Trump giving him the Presidency. George W Bush won but lost the popular vote and he got two terms. And he was another inarticulate clown. Putin had a lot of votes which he used to get Trump in behind the Grassy Knoll????????? My point was that polls cannot be trusted completely.Which would be a reasonable point were it not for the fact that you backed it up with polling which proved to be well within the margin of error, and indeed virtually spot on. What you should probably have said is there’s a difference between popularity and probability, and a poll which said Trump had a 30% chance of winning the election would not at all be wrong. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTG Posted February 27, 2020 Share Posted February 27, 2020 If you get the chance, have a read of Jon Sopel's A Year At The Circus. It's not new news but it's a decent reminder of just how much pish there has been. Stormy Daniels was a particular highlight of lies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zetterlund Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 I see Mike Pence has been put in charge of the US response to the coronavirus. Looking forward to it being officially classified as a biblical plague. I'm also hearing he has a plan involving bread & fish to deal with any food shortages. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 35 minutes ago, Zetterlund said: I see Mike Pence has been put in charge of the US response to the coronavirus. Looking forward to it being officially classified as a biblical plague. I'm also hearing he has a plan involving bread & fish to deal with any food shortages. Hot dog stand down the road's take on it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2020/02/28/world/americas/bolivia-election-fraud.amp.html It turns out there was no fraud in the Bolivian election. All the liberal ghouls who responded to a far right racist military coup with "But Morales...." need to get in the bin. The USA will not let poor brown people benefit from their nation's natural resources. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 3 hours ago, Detournement said: It turns out there was no fraud in the Bolivian election. I wouldn't call it that conclusive. Quote The researchers’ work did not address many of the allegations mentioned in the O.A.S. report, including the accusation that Bolivian officials maintained hidden servers that could have permitted the alteration of results. Instead, the researchers examined one allegation made by O.A.S. auditors: that differences in results reported before and after a pause in the initial vote count pointed to evidence of fraud in favor of Mr. Morales. O.A.S. officials called a sudden change in the voting trend in Mr. Morales’s favor “statistically unlikely.” But the researchers concluded that such a change was entirely plausible. “There does not seem to be a statistically significant difference in the margin before and after the halt of the preliminary vote,” they wrote. They pointed out that voting trends often shift as votes are counted. In the United States, for example, votes that come in after Election Day tend to favor Democratic candidates 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 "Hidden servers that altered the results" They haven't disproven because you can't disprove abstract nonsense but it seems like the onus is more on the accusers to prove it happened. No one has disproven that Fred Durst was behind 9/11 either. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 The OAS report is very detailed, the only thing the MIT conclusions differed from it was on the statistical analysis which was a small part of the report. Quote Conclusions of the preliminary findings In the four factors reviewed (technology, chain of custody, integrity of the tally sheets, and statistical projections), irregularities were detected, ranging from very serious to indicative of something wrong. This leads the technical audit team to question the integrity of the results of the election on October 20, 2019. As regards I.T. aspects, serious security flaws were discovered in both the TREP (Preliminary Election Results Transmission) and final count systems. In addition, a clear manipulation of the TREP system was discovered, which affected the results of both that system and the final count. The existence of 1,575 TREP tally sheets in the final count corresponds to approximately 350,000 votes. The first round margin of victory is fewer than 40,000 votes. Therefore, an irregularity on that scale is a determining factor in the outcome. For those reasons, the audit team is unable to confirm a first round victory. http://www.oas.org/documents/eng/press/Electoral-Integrity-Analysis-Bolivia2019.pdf 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted February 29, 2020 Share Posted February 29, 2020 And the point of the MIT report is that the OAS - right wing ghouls that they are - invented the problems with the early reporting. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.