Flybhoy Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 15 minutes ago, sjc said: Kevin Spaceys dressing room....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB 4.2 Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 46 minutes ago, Jacksgranda said: Where's this 16/1 Bar? I was going to say it's William G Stewart's latest venture but I remembered William G Stewart is dead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 On 08/11/2017 at 00:31, Miguel Sanchez said: Oh I forgot, Supras gave birth to the population argument re: international football. He deserved banned for that alone. He didn't give birth to it. He was just a major proponent of it on here and he was right to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Skidmarks Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Fascinating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Just now, Bobby Skidmarks said: Fascinating. It's even better than the original argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 38 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: He didn't give birth to it. He was just a major proponent of it on here and he was right to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 12 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Hey, you found a prominent and very well known exception to a pattern that is much more nuanced than you're implying, yet is still very dependable. That utterly disproves the entire theory. Time for a rethink clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: Hey, you found a prominent and very well known exception to a pattern that is much more nuanced than you're implying, yet is still very dependable. That utterly disproves the entire theory. Time for a rethink clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Just now, welshbairn said: Good God. Are you really just going to post clips of times when smaller countries did better than bigger ones? That task might detain you a while. It does not however, even dent the theory that the international sides who do best over a sustained period are those who combine a very well established footballing tradition with a large population. It's why Brazil and Argentina are powers in South America, while France, Germany, Spain and Italy are the strongest in Europe. England is World football's greatest underachiever. Keep insisting that success is unrelated to population if you like though. This thread will probably offer you a splendid audience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 1 minute ago, Monkey Tennis said: Good God. Are you really just going to post clips of times when smaller countries did better than bigger ones? That task might detain you a wh Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 One off results now. Keep 'em coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy85 Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Genuinely believe having better players is more important than population. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J_Stewart Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Monkey Tennis is really fucking boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Prince Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 He stinks up every single thread he posts in. Guy has the personality of a door handle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweaty Morph Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 What's the argument here? The higher a country's population, the more successful the national team is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wee-Bey Posted November 11, 2017 Share Posted November 11, 2017 33 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: Keep insisting that success is unrelated to population if you like though. Why not ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.