Gaz Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 14 minutes ago, NotThePars said: The first time they take a doing from their now bloodthirsty vengeful wean. See, that's what I'm thinking. I'm curious about whether all these folk who are for hitting babies and toddlers would do the same to someone in their mid teens. If not, why not? And what age does it stop? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimmy85 Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 3 minutes ago, Gaz said: See, that's what I'm thinking. I'm curious about whether all these folk who are for hitting babies and toddlers would do the same to someone in their mid teens. If not, why not? And what age does it stop? I’m more interested to hear at what age these utter psychopaths begin attacking their children. Two days old? Two weeks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 Folk who smack their kids agree with, are like or actually are one of these mouth-breathers. Let that sink in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby Skidmarks Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 "It never did me any harm" Yet here they are, posting comments on the Daily Mail website. Probably the biggest condemnation against smacking possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hk blues Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 Based on some of the comments from a number of the "Against" folks, there is a lot of pent up aggression building up. I wouldn't want to be their kid when the halo slips and they let loose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizfit Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 Ah the daily mail comments, where even the most sensible become mouth breathing, puddle drinking morons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chomp my root Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 42 minutes ago, Gaz said: See, that's what I'm thinking. I'm curious about whether all these folk who are for hitting babies and toddlers would do the same to someone in their mid teens. If not, why not? And what age does it stop? My kid is 25 now and I reckon I could still beat her in a fight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unleash The Nade Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 1 hour ago, whiskychimp said: That really is magnificent. Well done you . Could not stop laughing. A real triumph. Ten out of ten. Brava On the subject of smacking, VT has given you an absolute leathering here mate . Also, stop referring to old cars in your posts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PB 4.2 Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, Unleash The Nade said: Also, stop referring to old cars in your posts Old cars > Any bike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unleash The Nade Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 Just now, PB 4.2 said: Old cars > Any bike Trying too hard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiskychimp Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 13 minutes ago, Unleash The Nade said: On the subject of smacking, VT has given you an absolute leathering here mate . Also, stop referring to old cars in your posts Really. I find his trolling pretty basic and unimaginative but each to their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unleash The Nade Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 12 minutes ago, whiskychimp said: Really. I find his trolling pretty basic and unimaginative but each to their own. Fair enough At least he isn’t obsessively stalking you , unlike other trolls on here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 16 minutes ago, Unleash The Nade said: On the subject of smacking, VT has given you an absolute leathering here mate . Also, stop referring to old cars in your posts VT pontificating on childcare. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 Rather than punishing children for naughty behaviour with a smack, it's better to reward children for good behaviour with smack, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 I don't have kids so I have no opinion on whether people abuse them or not. People like Fritzl and Rose West are far more qualified to express an opinion on this matter than I am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scary Bear Posted October 20, 2017 Author Share Posted October 20, 2017 Folk who smack their kids agree with, are like or actually are one of these mouth-breathers. Let that sink in. You read the Daily Mail Comments sections. What is wrong with you? OFTW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Scary Bear said: You read the Daily Mail Comments sections. What is wrong with you? OFTW I read a tweet quoting the Daily Mail Comments section, thank you very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 26 minutes ago, Bairnardo said: Honestly know how this sounds and how it will be taken by some but its no more than an honest opinion from myself. Of course I follow the law, but I will never ever take a lecture on how to raise my kids from someone who doesnt have kids. (Obvious exceptions apply like if my kid needed a doctor or therapist who didnt have kids) but in general terms, if you dont have kids, I know better than you. I've never subscribed to this viewpoint, and I have two kids of my own. By that logic, someone who's studied, say, child psychology or child development or something like that for four or five years is less qualified than a 17-year old who's had sex? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, Gaz said: I've never subscribed to this viewpoint, and I have two kids of my own. By that logic, someone who's studied, say, child psychology or child development or something like that for four or five years is less qualified than a 17-year old who's had sex? Note the obvious exceptions he mentions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted October 20, 2017 Share Posted October 20, 2017 Yeah, alright. Wind your neck in Fritzl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.