Jump to content

English Premier League 2019-20


Recommended Posts

Those are the rules. Any handball that leads to a goal is automatically a foul whether or not it's deliberate. It's a farcical rule which was only brought in because of VAR right enough, so you can sort of blame it.
It's the inconsistency that annoys me, they have decided that any handball by an attacking player that leads to a goal is a foul, but defenders still have to either handle it intentionally or have their hands in an "unnatural" position to be penalised. It used to be that the attacking team would get the benefit of any doubt, but with the new handball law and offside being policed to 1mm by VAR, we've gone full circle.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would not have even been reviewed or disallowed if VAR was not there..


No it wouldn’t but VAR is there to interpret the laws of the game which it did correctly.

It’s the new handball rule that is the problem for that one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are the rules. Any handball that leads to a goal is automatically a foul whether or not it's deliberate. It's a farcical rule which was only brought in because of VAR right enough, so you can sort of blame it.
It is a farcical rule.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



No it wouldn’t but VAR is there to interpret the laws of the game which it did correctly.

It’s the new handball rule that is the problem for that one.

Decisions are part of the game.
Rub of the green is part of the game.
Subjective decisions made under the scrutiny of cameras and ruining the excitement of goal celebration is not football.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Decisions are part of the game.
Rub of the green is part of the game.
Subjective decisions made under the scrutiny of cameras and ruining the excitement of goal celebration is not football.


It wasn’t a subjective decision. It’s the laws of the game so it was the correct decision.

Do I agree with the rule? No but it is what it is just now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



It wasn’t a subjective decision. It’s the laws of the game so it was the correct decision.

Do I agree with the rule? No but it is what it is just now.

Nope. It’s a subjective rule made to ease the decision making of the VAR stasi.
Just as is drawing fancy lines and making decisions on offside goals based on millimetres despite the fact that there are areas of uncertainty of when to freeze frame.
I’ve been hostile to VAR for over 5 years now warning that it would be the ruination of our sport and take all the fun out of football.
Everything I see reiterates that...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching Leicester and Southampton and VAR strikes again.  Southampton have a penalty for a clear foul, but VAR calls it back for an offside that was under no circumstances a clear and obvious error, the Southampton player was offside by millimeters.  

So much for making VAR only for clear and obvious errors eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...