Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

39 minutes ago, parsforlife said:

Homophobic c***s are banned from being homophobic c***s in public spaces,  and can’t be homophobic c***s in their behaviour as a business.  Anti-vax c***s should be banned from being anti-vax c***s in public spaces and in their private business.   I don’t see much of a difference.

Homophobia is illegal because...

...it’s a discriminatory act against a protected characteristic, like, you know, religion.

you’re clearly on a crusade here that anyone that doesn’t want the vaccine for whatever reason should be outlawed from society because you can’t comprehend that there are people with valid reasons for not having the vaccine. 
 

good luck Piers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noticed Hancock explicitly say “the vaccine is our route to freedom” today. Fingers crossed. 
That positivity rate is concerning for Scotland today. I can only imagine this will increase once schools are reopened, and it’ll be an excuse for restrictions to continue longer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Cyclizine said:

Provide some evidence for this.

 

1 hour ago, Detournement said:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Left Back said:

Homophobia is illegal because...

...it’s a discriminatory act against a protected characteristic, like, you know, religion.

you’re clearly on a crusade here that anyone that doesn’t want the vaccine for whatever reason should be outlawed from society because you can’t comprehend that there are people with valid reasons for not having the vaccine. 
 

good luck Piers.

What valid reason beyond health (in which case you won’t ever be offered a vaccine, therefore can’t refuse) is there?   Give me ONE!  We are in the worst public health crisis in a century,  have taken dramatic action to limit its damage and have a population who have had their lives completely ruined.    The  only action we know of that can get significantly lower deaths and allow the mass population to get their lives back is vaccination,  refusing to engage in that is a a despicable action.  We are happy to fine and potentially jail people for refusing to take actions that have less impact,  with no legal cases that have succeed.  Not being vaccinated because the bible said so is not any different to saying your not doing it cos you read a post on Facebook.   Neither makes you  except   from being part of  a mass effort to get the whole county out of this shit.

Edited by parsforlife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, parsforlife said:

What valid reason beyond health (in which case you won’t ever be offered a vaccine, therefore can’t refuse) is there?   Give me ONE!  We are in the worst public health crisis in a century,  have taken dramatic action to limit its damage and have a population who have had their lives completely ruined.    The  only action we know of that can get significantly lower deaths and allow the mass population to get their lives back is vaccination,  refusing to engage in that is a a despicable action.  We are happy to fine an potentially jail people for refusing to take actions that have less impact,  with no legal cases that have succeed.  Not being vaccinated because the bible said so is not any different to saying your not doing it cos you read a post on Facebook.   Neither excepts you from being part of  a mass effort to get the whole county out of this shit.

Why don’t you go all the way and outlaw religion along with anything else that doesn’t fit what you believe?  You could ban facebook at the same time seeing as that’s a potentially an issue for your batshit mental crusade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don’t you go all the way and outlaw religion along with anything else that doesn’t fit what you believe?  You could ban facebook at the same time seeing as that’s a potentially an issue for your batshit mental crusade.
This is an outstanding idea tbf I'd be the first to sign a petition outlawing religion and facebook, imagine how much better the world would be.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Detournement said:

I'm sure there have been some inappropriate DNACPR decisions, but I don't think this is as widespread as the article suggests. Such an emotive and frequently misunderstood topic as resuscitation does not make for nuanced newspaper articles. I am please that this is being reviewed by the regulators.

Necessary medical care (as in life and limb threatening) has never been denied. We saw a massive decrease in people attending GPs and given their gatekeeper role, a decrease in secondary care referrals. This is not the same as denying appropriate care.

Edited by Cyclizine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Cyclizine said:

I'm sure there have been some inappropriate DNACPR decisions, but I don't think this is as widespread as the article suggests. Such an emotive and frequently misunderstood topic as resuscitation does not make for nuanced newspaper articles. I am please that this is being reviewed by the regulators.

Necessary medical care (as in life and limb threatening) has never been denied. We saw a massive decrease in people attending GPs and given their gatekeeper role, a decrease in secondary care referrals. This is not the same as denying appropriate care.

Since you're online I've a medical question.   

Is it true that cycling more that 15 miles a day increases the risk of type 2 diabetes?    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Left Back said:

Why don’t you go all the way and outlaw religion along with anything else that doesn’t fit what you believe?  You could ban facebook at the same time seeing as that’s a potentially an issue for your batshit mental crusade.

My only crusade is to get out of this shit.  We are nearly a year into this(and are going to comfortably meet the year mark and then some) and yet you are trying to justify delaying that cos you want to let a minority of our population do whatever the f**k they want?   That’s  madness.

Yea I have a disagreement generally with religion,  but normally it’s a case of live and let live,  if they are choosing to sing hymns and I choose to go to the pub then what the hell, let’s be civil.  If you go beyond that and are being a c**t to the detriment of society then expect to be called out on that.

Edited by parsforlife
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Theroadlesstravelled said:


Has he deleted it yet?

Someone should remind this shitehawk that it’s minorities that are most likely to not get the vaccine.

 

This is just the beginning. Blair has his article in the Mail on Sunday, Raab states it's possible and Morgan whips up some hatred. All on the same day. 

Manufacturing consent. 

Edited by Detournement
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...