Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, welshbairn said:

It's just a random statistic put against another to shock people. There's no vaccine for cancer to start with. 

A pedant writes:

There's an form of Human Papilloma virus that can cause cervical cancer which is why there's a programme of giving HPV vaccine to 12-13 year old girls. I remember NHS Scotland TV ads about it. So I suppose technically that is a vaccine against cancer.

As you were.

 

Edited by tamthebam
Stupidity
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, welshbairn said:

It's just a random statistic put against another to shock people. There's no vaccine for cancer to start with. Over half a million people die every year from non covid related things, the difference is that Covid deaths are actually becoming preventable.

They aren't random, they are inextricably linked when the same health service has to deal with both and have been prioritising one over all else.  There will be cancer patients that have died from curable cancers through lack of timely medical intervention, as I posted before we should be dealing with covid proportionately and not the Covid before all else that has been the case for over a year now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said:

That's fair enough, but we're not there anymore. The vaccine has completely changed the playing field, yet the pre-vaccine mentality of "iTs nOt fLu" remains. Correct, it isn't, but it's impact at the most serious end appears now to be very comparable.

We really do need to collectively stop looking at covid deaths as more tragic or preventable than any other deaths and accept that a relatively small number of people are going to get seriously ill and die as a result of it.

Until we do that, we won't move on. It will be interesting to see at what point it becomes ok to declare the pandemic "over"

In Scotland the Indy situation will play into this as declaring it over will then raise expectations of another referendum.  Far better for the SNP to continue to use COVID as their reason for delay until they find a new reason for delay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, strichener said:

They aren't random, they are inextricably linked when the same health service has to deal with both and have been prioritising one over all else.  There will be cancer patients that have died from curable cancers through lack of timely medical intervention, as I posted before we should be dealing with covid proportionately and not the Covid before all else that has been the case for over a year now.

It was never an either or thing though. Patients who entered hospital to get treated for other things were infected with covid and died. So they had to decide whether it was safer to delay treatment that would lower their immunity, during a time of rampant spread, or go ahead and take the chance. Isolating cancer patients say from the rest of the population isn't that easy, you'd have to have doctors, nurses, support staff etc living in a bubble for a start. Then another bubble for Covid patients. They didn't choose to make Covid a priority, it was a fact of life.

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scottsdad said:

Went to an indoor crazy golf course in Dunfermline with the kids. It is like a huge balloon and was utterly roasting. Half of folk wore face masks. I kept mine on until the sixth hole. Couldn't last any longer and took it off. 

Two shot penalty?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Todd_is_God said:

That's fair enough, but we're not there anymore. The vaccine has completely changed the playing field, yet the pre-vaccine mentality of "iTs nOt fLu" remains. Correct, it isn't, but it's impact at the most serious end appears now to be very comparable.

We really do need to collectively stop looking at covid deaths as more tragic or preventable than any other deaths and accept that a relatively small number of people are going to get seriously ill and die as a result of it.

Until we do that, we won't move on. It will be interesting to see at what point it becomes ok to declare the pandemic "over"

August 2020 I think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wee Bully said:

August 2020 I think?

Well according to Clownshoes earlier this year we were now dealing with "a different virus" so August 2020 would be accurate for the previous pandemic.

 

ribery.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theyd have hated Somerset on Tue night. Not only is it a quaint shit hole but everyone was standing where they liked and I'd say about 10% wore masks. Stewards werent fussed. Glorious 
Somerset. Glorious.

Fair play, you've given me a wee morning chuckle there. [emoji274]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...