Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

Thought that the "moonshot" was something new, a quick antibody test that could quickly determine if people are risk free from having contracted and recovered from the virus before, but it's not. It's just a quicker version of the antigen test we have now that uses saliva instead of swabs, so just as many false positives from dead viral traces as now if @Todd_is_God is right, hundreds of thousands of people falsely stopped from going about their business unnecessarily. And if you're negative one day you could be positive the next. Brave new Swedish world indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought that the "moonshot" was something new, a quick antibody test that could quickly determine if people are risk free from having contracted and recovered from the virus before, but it's not. It's just a quicker version of the antigen test we have now that uses saliva instead of swabs, so just as many false positives from dead viral traces as now if [mention=2588]Todd_is_God[/mention] is right, hundreds of thousands of people falsely stopped from going about their business unnecessarily. And if you're negative one day you could be positive the next. Brave new Swedish world indeed.

 

A 99% accuracy rate leaves you an almost 50/50 chance of being given a false positive if you take the test twice a week for six months, according to SAGE.

 

https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-scientists-doubtful-as-leaked-government-document-reveals-plans-for-10-million-tests-by-next-year-12067722

 

I’d be very surprised if this technology is up and running before a vaccine. If it’ll ever exist, and that’s before we even get into the mooted £100bn cost. You could extend furlough until next autumn at that price, or create a second NHS for nine months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Paco said:

I’d be very surprised if this technology is up and running before a vaccine. If it’ll ever exist, and that’s before we even get into the mooted £100bn cost. You could extend furlough until next autumn at that price, or create a second NHS for nine months.

Or you could send everyone in Britain on a Caribbean holiday to take their minds off it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Ron Aldo said:

Everyone downloaded the Protect Scotland app?

No way im waiting on Boris to pull off his "moonshot" because some bloke says at least they have a plan even though none of the plans have worked so far

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, WhiteRoseKillie said:

After the last couple of days,  I think we should have a wee vote - who's been the biggest embarrassment on here?

Is it virginton, with his paranoid ramblings about some kind of parental cabal to rival the Illuminati influencing our society?

Or maybe Todd_is_God, who somehow has managed to equate that bucket of high-grade bullshít Downing St threw at us yesterday with "the Swedish model"?

We've all come up with theories or arguments on here which have been proved erroneous as the pandemic continues, but these two have been consistent in their ability to deliver, with utter conviction, absolute tripe on a consistent basis. Over the last few days, they appear to both have stepped it up a gear, and this is surely worthy of recognition?

795F5B97-D4CE-4ADB-A2FC-0BA56212233F.jpeg.e6fa7b230401b50124764400f510e170.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Following on from ICTChris' question of when the enhanced restrictions will land, any takers for when the first video of an overly-officious 'Covid Marshall' on a massive power trip appears on social media? 

I'll go with Tuesday. 

Edited by Michael W
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, welshbairn said:

Thought that the "moonshot" was something new, a quick antibody test that could quickly determine if people are risk free from having contracted and recovered from the virus before, but it's not. It's just a quicker version of the antigen test we have now that uses saliva instead of swabs, so just as many false positives from dead viral traces as now if @Todd_is_God is right, hundreds of thousands of people falsely stopped from going about their business unnecessarily. And if you're negative one day you could be positive the next. Brave new Swedish world indeed.

Let's preface this by saying neither is ideal.

But, what would you rather, a test which, if 99.5% specific (a number that would be increased by lowering the cycle threshold) could allow 21,304 people (based on 108 positives) into Pittodrie this weekend to behave normally, or, we continue to hold nonsense trials of a few hundred people to make sure we can allow maybe 25% capacities at some undetermined point in future, wearing masks and not being permitted to sing or celebrate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of the most embarrassing contributors to the thread , the shit flinging *** has to be right up there. Ridiculed time and time again but keeps coming back for more. 

Over 26,000 faecal-fingered posts on this website and every one of them could make your skin crawl.

Ice Hockey Reaction GIF by NHL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In terms of the most embarrassing contributors to the thread , the shit flinging *** has to be right up there. Ridiculed time and time again but keeps coming back for more. 
Over 26,000 faecal-fingered posts on this website and every one of them could make your skin crawl.
200.gif&key=a47de6b0a9a52faef3836626a15d90a031fe2434ec102d81c926153578a7353e
Great Post, will read again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said:

Let's preface this by saying neither is ideal.

But, what would you rather, a test which, if 99.5% specific (a number that would be increased by lowering the cycle threshold) could allow 21,304 people (based on 108 positives) into Pittodrie this weekend to behave normally, or, we continue to hold nonsense trials of a few hundred people to make sure we can allow maybe 25% capacities at some undetermined point in future, wearing masks and not being permitted to sing or celebrate?

Even if it was possible to test 21,000 people before a game, it's unlikely to happen before 2021/22, so probably after a vaccine makes it unnecessary. Still have no idea why you think this would be following the Swedish model, and am curious if you think Nicola should follow the 6 max and Street Covid Commissars policy?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...