Jump to content

Coronavirus (COVID-19)


Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Dons_1988 said:

Probably more accurate to say their period since vaccinations were largely delivered has been successful.

You are right to say the early part of the year was disastrous but that’s probably down to failings in late November when delta arrived. 

Would it not be rather strange to say "England had a pretty good 2021 in terms of COVID" by way of contrast with Scotland anyway?  (I know you didn't say it by the way)

In terms of deaths, neither did great.  In terms of restrictions, they spent much of the year following pretty similar paths.  It was only really at the very end of 2021 that we saw significant divergence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monkey Tennis said:

 In terms of restrictions, they spent much of the year following pretty similar paths.  It was only really at the very end of 2021 that we saw significant divergence.

This is simply untrue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Todd_is_God said:

You're doing that extrapolating thing again...

Out of interest, as you appear to be of the opinion there is absolutely no place for zero hour contracts, what robust employment contract do you think would be appropriate for the role of vaccine passport checker at Celtic Park?

I wonder if @Monkey Tennis will actually answer this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said:

I wonder if @Monkey Tennis will actually answer this?

Hadn't seen it until now.

It's difficult to see why such roles would have been touted as lasting 12 months in the first place.  What I'm not enthusiastic about is the gleeful reaction to the news that employers can ditch people at the drop of a hat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monkey Tennis said:

Hadn't seen it until now.

It's difficult to see why such roles would have been touted as lasting 12 months in the first place.  What I'm not enthusiastic about is the gleeful reaction to the news that employers can ditch people at the drop of a hat.

Did that happen? I think you've made that up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jan/19/science-covid-ineradicable-disease-prevention

We were so close to the perfect "pivot in the face of public opinion" from Darling Devi.

"In the UK the prime minister announced today that restrictions including masking requirements will be removed from next week, and self-isolation requirements will be reviewed in March. I think this is largely reasonable – all governments face the question of how to approach this new landscape."

Until...

"What does all this mean in terms of living with Covid-19? We still need to test. We still need to vaccinate and combat misinformation. We need to encourage people to wear medical-grade masks such as N95s in crowded and indoor settings. Employers need to recognise and support employees who have been identified as in a shielding group. We also need to review isolation and other policies so they remain safe, but are less disruptive to the functioning of society."

Of course the Scottish Government's fetish for masks is fairly obvious, but I'm concerned that, as Devi has her ear, that we will move to a "masks are guidance" situation in the next few months meaning the weird moral high ground will still be taken by some folk and some businesses. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Monkey Tennis said:

Genuine question:

What were the big differences?

- Restrictions on gatherings until August 9th

- Social distancing requirements in public spaces until August 9th. Both reintroduced after four months.

- Physical distancing still required in educational settings

- Mask mandates

- Vaccine passports for large events

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bairnardo said:

Definitely made up. MT is certainly the latest to jump the shark on here.

One strawman after another. Relentless.

As I alluded to last night he has previous for extrapolating a ridiculous point from a reply and going off on one.

Very odd behaviour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Her article is all over the place.
First off she wrongly claims there are just 3 camps of people, describing two as lunatic fringe groups and saying she belongs to the middle one  - a group occupied by voices of reason such as herself.
Having safely perched herself on the moral high ground using that false categorisation of people's opinions to covid restrictions, she then goes on to say pretty much nothing. First off all she thinks removing masks down South is "largely reasonable" before then doing a u-turn and saying we don't just need to keep masks but now we need N95 grade masks. Within a few sentences, she's back talking about how we need to get back to hugging again. Good luck to anyone trying to gauge what she really believes in.
Devi is a deluded fraud who senses the tide is turning and is trying to turn with it to retain the position of influence she has carefully crafted for herself. She has no real principles beyond that but has the ear of Sturgeon. That's what makes this type of person inherently dangerous. She should be removed from her position and denied further research funding from the public purse for being complicit in the destruction  of the credibility of the scientific profession and the many brilliant real scientists who make a genuine difference in the world. And she's not the only one who should suffer that fate.

This is over lads
Masks aff HWFG
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, virginton said:

- Restrictions on gatherings until August 9th

- Social distancing requirements in public spaces until August 9th. Both reintroduced after four months.

- Physical distancing still required in educational settings

- Mask mandates

- Vaccine passports for large events

Yes, all pretty minor and cosmetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Miguel Sanchez said:

Well you keep ruining mine by quoting Monkey Tennis, so I can understand why you would have missed it.

Should you not be running another bullying thread, while expressing concern elsewhere over mental health issues?

Edited by Monkey Tennis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/01/2022 at 19:21, Left Back said:

They won’t be.  If passports get binned those people will be emptied sharpish.  Very easy to do for someone that’s been employed for such a short length of time.

This one sounded pretty chirpy about the fate of defenceless employees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/01/2022 at 19:24, DeeTillEhDeh said:

12 month contract is meaningless.

If you work less than 2 years, bar the Equality Act, you have almost no employment rights.

They could be fired without any reason given.

I  wouldn't have called this one downbeat either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...