Bishop Briggs Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 1 minute ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: Not that I am aware. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that votes that were received after Election Day, even with no postmark, were to counted as valid. https://www.thedp.com/article/2020/11/pennsylvania-supreme-court-mail-in-voting-decision "The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday to allow Pennsylvania to accept mail-in ballots received up to three days after Election Day." That's a recipe for fraud. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 (edited) 24 minutes ago, NotThePars said: Honourably shooting Afghan children, dutifully strafing Pashtun farmers, torturing the prisoners of Abu Ghraib with dignity, and serving in a caravan in Nevada with #pride #oorah Most serving military aren't into that. I'm not making any sort of case for them being a fine bunch of lads, just saying why I think they don't support Trump as much as might be expected. Edited November 5, 2020 by GordonS 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cosmic Joe Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 1 minute ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: That's the official title of the state. Bit like the Kingdom of Fife then? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 10 minutes ago, J_Stewart said: Melania serving him the divorce papers live on air at the exact moment it’s announced that Biden has passed the 270 threshold is now the end game, lads. Just think about it. It would be the greatest moment in television history. Banter’s greatest masterpiece. Patter’s magnum opus. The worlds biggest ego suffering the worlds greatest defeat. I have never wanted anything more in my entire life. If we can dream it, we can achieve it. Think big, one and all. How do we get Dominic Cummings involved the queen kicking him in the stones? Anyway I'm off to bed hopefully nothing happens for the next few hours. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 Veterans overwhelmingly vote Republican, but in the last election serving military went for Hillary 55-45, while the most recent survey I saw suggested that most would vote Biden this time around. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 4 minutes ago, Angusfifer said: What is this Commonwealth of Pennsylvania shit? It the official title. Like, Nation of Brunei, the Abode of Peace. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, Angusfifer said: What is this Commonwealth of Pennsylvania shit? It's the official title of Pennsylvania thicko! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotThePars Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Bishop Briggs said: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that votes that were received after Election Day, even with no postmark, were to counted as valid. https://www.thedp.com/article/2020/11/pennsylvania-supreme-court-mail-in-voting-decision "The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday to allow Pennsylvania to accept mail-in ballots received up to three days after Election Day." That's a recipe for fraud. Where is 'no postmark' in that article? "The Court’s decision followed a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling requiring boards of elections to count mail-in ballots postmarked by Nov. 3 and received by Nov. 6. Following the state court ruling, the Republican Party of Pennsylvania appealed to the Supreme Court to overturn the ruling. The Supreme Court declined to take up the Republican Party's challenge, leaving the original ruling in place, CNN reported." They still need to be postmarked. There won't be that many tbqh. Edited November 5, 2020 by DeeTillEhDeh 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONisSheep Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 2 minutes ago, Bishop Briggs said: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that votes that were received after Election Day, even with no postmark, were to counted as valid. https://www.thedp.com/article/2020/11/pennsylvania-supreme-court-mail-in-voting-decision "The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday to allow Pennsylvania to accept mail-in ballots received up to three days after Election Day." That's a recipe for fraud. I don't see how it's a recipe for fraud. Possibly bloody annoying but unlikely to be fraudulent. Ballots will still have to be from registered voters etc. It's not double voting and it's not coerced voting, it's just late. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thistle_do_nicely Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 1 minute ago, NotThePars said: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fratelli Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 Trump speaking in about half an hour (if i've got my time zones correct). Could be a laugh. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 1 minute ago, aDONisSheep said: I don't see how it's a recipe for fraud. Possibly bloody annoying but unlikely to be fraudulent. Ballots will still have to be from registered voters etc. It's not double voting and it's not coerced voting, it's just late. Given the attempts by Trump and his lackey to undermine the postal service it’s not unreasonable. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 CNN not mincing their words about Trump's potential statement: "He's not just going to just try to change the narrative. Hes going to lie about the fact that votes are being counted. He's going to depict that democracy is nefarious when it is not" Spot on. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 55 minutes ago, itzdrk said: Still on my OG account from 2009, if it dies I'm done. I would of done the same only for the football.. only thing I follow is Hibs 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 10 minutes ago, Bishop Briggs said: The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that votes that were received after Election Day, even with no postmark, were to counted as valid. https://www.thedp.com/article/2020/11/pennsylvania-supreme-court-mail-in-voting-decision "The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday to allow Pennsylvania to accept mail-in ballots received up to three days after Election Day." That's a recipe for fraud. How would you go about fraudulently making advantage of this? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 3 minutes ago, aDONisSheep said: I don't see how it's a recipe for fraud. Possibly bloody annoying but unlikely to be fraudulent. Ballots will still have to be from registered voters etc. It's not double voting and it's not coerced voting, it's just late. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/20/supreme-court-will-allow-pennsylvania-to-count-ballots-received-up-to-3-days-after-the-election.html "The justices divided 4-4 on Monday, an outcome that upholds a state Supreme Court ruling that required county election officials to receive and count mailed-in ballots that arrive up until Nov. 6, even if they don’t have a clear postmark, as long as there is not proof it was mailed after the polls closed." That's a clear opportunity for fraud. The voters had plenty of time to post their ballot papers on time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 (edited) It's only "a recipe for fraud" if someone can demonstrate that late votes are verified less stringently than votes received earlier. So, unless you can find evidence to support such a theory, your suggestion is hysterical bollocks. Edited November 5, 2020 by Bully Wee Villa 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
101 Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 to be fair he didn't claim to be the best at starting civil wars so will need to edit the mash up 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, welshbairn said: How would you go about fraudulently making advantage of this? Find enough voters who have a track record of not voting in elections, fill in blank papers and smudge the postmark. ETA - for the avoidance of doubt, I'm not a Trump supporter. I would support the Libertarian Party and regard both the Republicans and Democrats as equally abhorrent. Edited November 5, 2020 by Bishop Briggs 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.