Jump to content

Normal Island


Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Mark Connolly said:

Can’t wait for the meltdowns later when twitter is full of videos of invited guests not bothering their arses with the “People’s pledge”

Twitter's going to be insufferable though with videos of folk so bothered they'll film themselves doing it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ned Nederlander said:

Twitter's going to be insufferable though with videos of folk so bothered they'll film themselves doing it

I'm hoping there is a bit where contenders can challenge, like Black Panther, and Harry swaggers up to the front M'Baku style

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Police lock up people for having fabric straps to hold their signs up with.

This is a travesty as presumably now bicycle locks are banned in England and Wales under their new daft laws passed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, good old Britain, where you can be arrested for wearing the wrong kind of t-shirt. 

"Footage appeared to show demonstrators in "Not My King" t-shirts being arrested by police, including Graham Smith, CEO of Republic."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dan Steele said:

Ah, good old Britain, where you can be arrested for wearing the wrong kind of t-shirt. 

"Footage appeared to show demonstrators in "Not My King" t-shirts being arrested by police, including Graham Smith, CEO of Republic."

He wasn't arrested for wearing a t shirt. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RuMoore said:

He wasn't arrested for wearing a t shirt. 

Arrested for "suspicion of having equipment for locking on".

They didnt, according to the BBC just now (well, until they were handcuffed, when they absolutely did !!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Molotov said:

There's a range of different arrestable offences that the police obviously have at their disposal. 

My point is complete pedantry but it's not for wearing a t shirt. I'm sure he'll be released without charge later on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RuMoore said:

There's a range of different arrestable offences that the police obviously have at their disposal. 

Which is fcuking ludicrous. It’s a fascist  regime.

Do you support such draconian measures?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RuMoore said:

There's a range of different arrestable offences that the police obviously have at their disposal. 

My point is complete pedantry but it's not for wearing a t shirt. I'm sure he'll be released without charge later on. 

You're right. It seems he was also collecting drinks and placards. Police did say they'd adopt an extremely low threshold for arrests right enough, but is that not worrying?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Molotov said:

Which is fcuking ludicrous. It’s a fascist  regime.

Do you support such draconian measures?

 

 

8 minutes ago, Dan Steele said:

You're right. It seems he was also collecting drinks and placards. Police did say they'd adopt an extremely low threshold for arrests right enough, but is that not worrying?

Yeah I don't agree with the police here.. 

Edited by RuMoore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, RuMoore said:

There's a range of different arrestable offences that the police obviously have at their disposal. 

My point is complete pedantry but it's not for wearing a t shirt. I'm sure he'll be released without charge later on. 

He almost certainly will be released without charge but is that not the point, the Met clearly couldn't wait to lock them up for a few hours, I don't get how that's not an abuse of their power, rather than policing a protest properly they are sticking folk in the cells as the easy option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 101 said:

He almost certainly will be released without charge but is that not the point, the Met clearly couldn't wait to lock them up for a few hours, I don't get how that's not an abuse of their power, rather than policing a protest properly they are sticking folk in the cells as the easy option.

The reason it's not an abuse of power is because they've managed to get ridiculous powers to deter protesters. 

The government have been disgraceful with this stuff over the past few years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RuMoore said:

The reason it's not an abuse of power is because they've managed to get ridiculous powers to deter protesters. 

The government have been disgraceful with this stuff over the past few years. 

It might not be an abuse of power but the law is certainly being applied unequally, because there is simply no chance that the pro royalty demonstration will be policed as strictly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...