Jump to content

Darvel FC Thread


Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, Lokloyal said:

Interesting-so all of the upgrades were added to a ground the club didn’t own ?

Pretty sure this is fine providing you get approval from the land owner. Which I think is Beith’s issue that they can’t get permission from the landowner to put floodlights

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Sortmeout said:

Darvel did produce the greatest Scottish football shock of all time with the Aberdeen result and the club/Gall/MK will always have that as their legacy. 

Technically the biggest shock in scottish cup history is Drumchapel beating Edinburgh City 62 league places separated them,

 

Aberdeen and Darvel was only 56

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chris_the_rover said:

Technically the biggest shock in scottish cup history is Drumchapel beating Edinburgh City 62 league places separated them,

 

Aberdeen and Darvel was only 56

Technically yes but only one result will be spoken about for the next 100 years and it won't be drumchapel .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ibenji said:

Pretty sure this is fine providing you get approval from the land owner. Which I think is Beith’s issue that they can’t get permission from the landowner to put floodlights

A difficult one -always thought Beith owned Bellsdale and didn’t realise they were tenants 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Peter Culter said:

They will definitely get to the end of the season. I have no doubt about that.

I did hear a rumour towards the end of last season that Gall got an ultimatum from auditors who visited Pie HQ.

Along the lines of run your business properly and stop throwing money at your hobby or you won’t have a business…

 

 

 

Gall has thrown more money at his favourite football team than he has ever thrown at Darvel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lokloyal said:

A difficult one -always thought Beith owned Bellsdale and didn’t realise they were tenants 

Yeah Beith thought North Ayrshire Council were their landlord however it transpires the land is actually owned by a historical trust whose last living member died in 1971. Without the land owners permission you can’t get planning therefore no floodlights and as such no license 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ibenji said:

Yeah Beith thought North Ayrshire Council were their landlord however it transpires the land is actually owned by a historical trust whose last living member died in 1971. Without the land owners permission you can’t get planning therefore no floodlights and as such no license 

that's mental.

surely there must be a way to have a living person become responsible for decision-making for the site on behalf of the trust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, ibenji said:

Yeah Beith thought North Ayrshire Council were their landlord however it transpires the land is actually owned by a historical trust whose last living member died in 1971. Without the land owners permission you can’t get planning therefore no floodlights and as such no license 

Have a seance to contact one of the former committee to see if it's ok. I nominate @Thejackdaw (Hertha) to lead it. He could wear an Ali Baba hat and everything!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Inanimate Carbon Rod said:

Surely Beith can apply to a court for an exemption to get floodlights built on the assumption there is no change of use for the ground that the trust approved hundred or so years ago?

Or the council just compulsory purchase it? Hardly going to have any objections...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, energyzone said:

Maybe Beith are quite happy with the current situation re floodlights and licencing?  No licence = no promotion and things in the WOSFL remain as they are.  If they are then they won't be the only ones.

The only snag with that is the necessity to win their way into the big Scottish in order to suckle from that particular teat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, energyzone said:

Maybe Beith are quite happy with the current situation re floodlights and licencing?  No licence = no promotion and things in the WOSFL remain as they are.  If they are then they won't be the only ones.

That is complete and utter nonsense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The club have already invested a good bit of time and money into progressing ground ownership and getting licensed - transfer to a new trust etc but the legal issues are very frustrating for all involved. Sadly no exciting or interesting alternative reasons. As for promotion, can't even think about that in October or we'd fall flat on our face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 15/10/2023 at 20:16, Ceejayar said:

I believe so, certainly when the dressing rooms and covered terracing went in that was the case.

I understand the ground was gifted to the council by lsdy London but must be used solely for community recreation purposes. The council were keen to pass it on for a nominal figure of £3000. Any purchaser is bound by the original conditions in the title deeds. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...