Swami Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 5 hours ago, Richie said: We've not been privvy to all the angles. Its done by computer using pixel close ups from (min) 6 angles. Its very tiresome. Celtic, despite having every advantage going, owned by a billionaire, a PLC, 9 out of 10 titles a quadruple treble, still bringing out the opressed, downtrodden, conspiracy card. Fans absolutely lap it up as well. They also won 2-1. Like they beat Hearts 4-3 the other week and wouldn’t shut the f**k up about how the whole system is against them because they didn’t get 1 decision. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
craigkillie Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 5 hours ago, Richie said: We've not been privvy to all the angles. Its done by computer using pixel close ups from (min) 6 angles. We should be privy to all the angles, that is the very basic expectation that supporters should have if they are going to impose this dreadful system on us. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Brees Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 2 hours ago, Swami said: They also won 2-1. Like they beat Hearts 4-3 the other week and wouldn’t shut the f**k up about how the whole system is against them because they didn’t get 1 decision. Can you imagine the shite we’d take on here if we just waited til we lost before pointing out the glaring inconsistencies in the performance of the refs and the var refs? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 23 hours ago, kingjoey said: There is absolutely no way that anyone can definitively see if he is on or off so the original decision of offside has to stand. Getting it wrong twice is a double down,trying to keep the score down like Miovski's a few weeks ago at the same venue. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 29 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said: Getting it wrong twice is a double down,trying to keep the score down like Miovski's a few weeks ago at the same venue. I think the general consensus, King William, is that it was actually offside and therefore the correct decision. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 12 hours ago, Busta Nut said: This is a result of us having very basic VAR equipment when it's not on the telly. From what the SFA were saying, the same might well have happened if it had been on TV. While Sky have goal-line cameras that can be used for offsides, the field of view wouldn’t have been big enough, because Jota was only just over the half-way line. So if the “correct” 18-yard line camera was still being used for close-ups off the pitch, they’s no guarantee things would have been any better. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Job Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 4 hours ago, Drew Brees said: Can you imagine the shite we’d take on here if we just waited til we lost before pointing out the glaring inconsistencies in the performance of the refs and the var refs? Celtic are not even complaining that it was ruled offside, just why wasn’t shown from a better angle VAR isn’t cheap, hardly an unreasonable request and I suspect if it involved other teams this “paranoid” nonsense wouldn’t even be a thought 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archie McSquackle Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 But they're saying their technology showed he was correctly flagged offside. There's been no attempt to explain how a throw-in can be allowed to come onto the field of play off an opponent's head, directly leading to a goal. Funny that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
muirkirk nil Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 Look at that angle, that's disgraceful. It's the worst angle ever, Sevco would never get such a shite angle.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Busta Nut Posted November 11, 2022 Share Posted November 11, 2022 1 hour ago, The Master said: From what the SFA were saying, the same might well have happened if it had been on TV. There would have been many more cameras at the game if it was on telly. So I reckon the angles would have been better in general even if the camera was trying to get shots of Ange Postecoglou. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welldaft Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 Have u ever heard such a bunch of moaning cnuts in your whole life. Jesus H Christ. Celtic won the game it is not as if they lost or it was a draw. I am so fed up of the compliant media and radio programmes that pander to their inferiority complex. Absolutely nothing about the Celtic player that was off the pitch and headed the ball to Turnbull from our throw in and who set up the 2nd goal. At 1-0 down. Nah does not suit the media agenda. God knows if that had happened to the victims we would hear about it for the next two centuries. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinky67 Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 (edited) 2 hours ago, welldaft said: Have u ever heard such a bunch of moaning cnuts in your whole life. Jesus H Christ. Celtic won the game it is not as if they lost or it was a draw. I am so fed up of the compliant media and radio programmes that pander to their inferiority complex. Absolutely nothing about the Celtic player that was off the pitch and headed the ball to Turnbull from our throw in and who set up the 2nd goal. At 1-0 down. Nah does not suit the media agenda. God knows if that had happened to the victims we would hear about it for the next two centuries. It wasn’t headed to Turnbull, Haksabanovic had zero clue the ball was being thrown at him and he made zero attempt to play the ball so it was deflected off him, it’s a subtle but important detail however it’s not something VAR would look at, they would only look at it from the moment Turnbull picks up the ball not how it arrived at him hence why the media haven’t mentioned it. And by griping about it the way you are makes you a bit of a moaning c**t too Edited November 12, 2022 by Jinky67 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jinky67 Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 (edited) 10 hours ago, Swami said: They also won 2-1. Like they beat Hearts 4-3 the other week and wouldn’t shut the f**k up about how the whole system is against them because they didn’t get 1 decision. It’s not about the system being against us as few people are actually complaining about the offside decision itself it’s about paying £200k a season that has shown so far that it can take too long and those operating it are making too many errors and refs seem to want to abdicate responsibility for decision making to it. Its shit, get it in the fucking bin as we are no better off with it than without it Edited November 12, 2022 by Jinky67 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richie Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 It’s not about the system being against us It very much is about that.Noone is being fooled by veiled arguments about the technical context.Every season, all season, all we hear about is conspiracies, 'honest mistakes', referee bias etc. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 Didn't realise the throw in header lead to their second goal, so they're all in fits of tears because a goal was correctly ruled offside in the same match they got a goal as dodgy as the come, some club paranoid and entitled doesn't even begin to cover it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 5 hours ago, Jinky67 said: Its shit, get it in the fucking bin as we are no better off with it than without it Who could possibly have foreseen this happening. Just as who could have foreseen that Celtic would be the first team to have a hissy fit over it. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 (edited) Celtic fans crying about VAR being "against them" is right up there in surprise terms with the discoveries of bears defecating in woodland areas. They simply can't function without believing whatever trophies they win in a two (or more recently one) horse race are somehow done so against the odds/establishment. Utterly pathetic stuff and a shining example of why the rest of us look down on old firm fans. ETA: https://thecelticblog.com/2022/10/articles-and-features/celtic-fans-the-great-var-scandal-of-2022-is-upon-us/ Edited November 12, 2022 by Day of the Lords 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 6 hours ago, Jinky67 said: It’s not about the system being against us as few people are actually complaining about the offside decision itself it’s about paying £200k a season that has shown so far that it can take too long and those operating it are making too many errors and refs seem to want to abdicate responsibility for decision making to it. Its shit, get it in the fucking bin as we are no better off with it than without it It's about pressurising officials so that they think twice about giving a decision against celtic. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJF Posted November 12, 2022 Share Posted November 12, 2022 Let’s be honest here, the criticism of VAR is entirely fair and warranted and the footage provided to fans that highlighted Jota’s offside isn’t really acceptable, is it. The only issue I’ve got is the leaking of the letter being written to the SFA (or SPFL) to put pressure on officials after they’d already had it explained to them the decision was correct. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.