Jump to content

#Barclays 24/25


Wee-Bey

Recommended Posts

Just now, buchan30 said:

I meant to say down to 9. The first one is a red, that i agree with. It’s the second one i would take issue with. On MOTD it looks like there is the slightest of contact, but it looks like the spurs player clips his own heels. 

Right - I'd agree regards the first yellow card - but it's asking for trouble to go in as he did for the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, No_Problemo said:

I’ve always wondered why Liverpool are so disliked on here - values wise they surely measure up (royal, Tory hating etc) more similarly to people on here than any other side! I’m obviously assuming no one takes that into account, but for me it’s probably my most liked place in England. Footballing wise having Doak and Robertson there helps too. 

Pretty much the same reason as has been said. I was literally on a Twitter thread earlier today where more than one of their fans was giving it (genuine) conspiracy theories about how everyone was against them. The English Celtic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, buchan30 said:

I meant to say down to 9. The first one is a red, that i agree with. It’s the second one i would take issue with. On MOTD it looks like there is the slightest of contact, but it looks like the spurs player clips his own heels. 

See for that first one, the ref gave a yellow - was it an obvious error? Seeing it in real time, it looks like a yellow. Seeing it slowed down shows that the reason the contact was made was that Jones got the ball, his foot then rolled over it and into the boys leg. But it looks like the referee was shown the still image on the monitor first, before any video footage. That makes it look a million times worse and makes the referee think he's made a major error. 

Also, why weren't the Villa 2nd and 3rd goals ruled out? Looked offside for the second then how that wasn't a foul on March for the third I just don't understand. The Villa player headed his legs away from him! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Salvo Montalbano said:

See for that first one, the ref gave a yellow - was it an obvious error? Seeing it in real time, it looks like a yellow. Seeing it slowed down shows that the reason the contact was made was that Jones got the ball, his foot then rolled over it and into the boys leg. But it looks like the referee was shown the still image on the monitor first, before any video footage. That makes it look a million times worse and makes the referee think he's made a major error. 

Also, why weren't the Villa 2nd and 3rd goals ruled out? Looked offside for the second then how that wasn't a foul on March for the third I just don't understand. The Villa player headed his legs away from him! 

I suppose they might say that it doesn't matter HOW Jones boot got in that position, the fact that his studs finished up planted right the middle of the Spurs boys standing leg makes it a red

Edited by Bairnardo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Brightside said:

It is an absolute stonewaller of a red card, mental folk are trying to say it wasn't purely because he slightly clipped the ball, before planting his studs on the Spurs player's shin.

It started with a fairly shrill Gary Neville complaining that it should be a yellow "because we don't want to see the game spoiled"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Mr. Brightside said:

It is an absolute stonewaller of a red card, mental folk are trying to say it wasn't purely because he slightly clipped the ball, before planting his studs on the Spurs player's shin.

Absolute nonsense.  He was entitled to go for the ball and his foot slipped over the top of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:

Absolute nonsense.  He was entitled to go for the ball and his foot slipped over the top of it.

Never said he wasn't, what he's not entitled to do is plant his studs on someone's shin because he made a c**t of the tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Mr. Brightside said:

Never said he wasn't, what he's not entitled to do is plant his studs on someone's shin because he made a c**t of the tackle.

And I’m not saying it wasn’t a foul but the original decision of a yellow for the offence was the correct one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:

Put your house on Everton going down - absolutely rank.

No chance. They'll win their 36th and 37th league games and draw on the final day to stay up on goal difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The Golden God said:

There’s a few reasons to hate Liverpool but the main one is the disgusting Scouse accent. 

Especially when they're calling everything good 'boss'. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Bairnardo said:

It started with a fairly shrill Gary Neville complaining that it should be a yellow "because we don't want to see the game spoiled"

Did you hear Neville talking over Kelly Cates as she was reading out the PGMOL statement? 
https://www.skysports.com/watch/video/sports/football/12973792/pgmol-accept-mistake-with-diaz-offside-its-a-horrendous-error


The guy should be told to shut up by the producers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...