bennett Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 Just now, Ooooft. said: It’s a welcome distraction from your relentless paranoia actually. Hi Clown Job. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ooooft. Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 Just now, bennett said: Hi Clown Job. Hi Nut Job. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sortmeout Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 On 03/09/2023 at 14:05, Salt n Vinegar said: Can't complain. Powder puff up front where the quality is so important. Simple truth is that the front signings are not even SPL quality, never mind Europe quality. Long season ahead. Some decent players in the Saudi league to be fair. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derry Alli Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 13 minutes ago, bennett said: Hi Clown Job. That was my thought. One was Cliwn Job and the other is about to talk to himself on separate accounts. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ooooft. Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 14 minutes ago, Derry Alli said: That was my thought. One was Cliwn Job and the other is about to talk to himself on separate accounts. Hello. Does this mean I’m you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 That banner before the game btw 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ooooft. Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 1 minute ago, throbber said: That banner before the game btw 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willywastecoat Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 1 hour ago, bennett said: constantly defending celtic is taking it's toll. Not at Ibrox zippy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ewanandmoreagain Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 46 minutes ago, throbber said: That banner before the game btw Sorry , what of knowledge did it say ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willywastecoat Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 Duz any rangers fan know why Danilo and Cifuentes wasn't playing? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ooooft. Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 2 minutes ago, willywastecoat said: Duz any rangers fan know why Danilo and Cifuentes wasn't playing? I suspect it’s mainly due to the fact they’re shite. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 4 hours ago, AJF said: I’d imagine soft foul is one that, as you suggest, is considered supported by the laws yet appears to be subjective. I’d say this probably falls under that category given the variance in opinion on it. Unusual I know, but have to agree with Jinky. There is absolutely no thing as a soft foul. "Soft fouls" don't exist. If it's a foul, it's a foul, if it's not a foul, it's not a foul. Perfectly simple, a bit like me. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willywastecoat Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 2 minutes ago, Ooooft. said: I suspect it’s mainly due to the fact they’re shite. Sevco playing hooof ball was a joy to watch. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJF Posted September 4, 2023 Author Share Posted September 4, 2023 (edited) 15 minutes ago, kingjoey said: Unusual I know, but have to agree with Jinky. There is absolutely no thing as a soft foul. "Soft fouls" don't exist. If it's a foul, it's a foul, if it's not a foul, it's not a foul. Perfectly simple, a bit like me. Totally get that, but it’s a regularly used term in the footballing world so I was giving what my interpretation of the term was. Essentially a subjective call that can be supported by the laws of the game but often treated differently. I’m not really arguing it isn’t a foul to be honest. Edited September 4, 2023 by AJF 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuMoore Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 13 minutes ago, kingjoey said: Unusual I know, but have to agree with Jinky. There is absolutely no thing as a soft foul. "Soft fouls" don't exist. If it's a foul, it's a foul, if it's not a foul, it's not a foul. Perfectly simple, a bit like me. If we want to be pedantic there's definitely such thing as a soft foul as in if you're a referee and someone two foots a c**t and sends them 2 metres in the air that's more of an obvious foul than someone slightly knicking into someone's trailing leg. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
willywastecoat Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 (edited) 8 minutes ago, RuMoore said: If we want to be pedantic there's definitely such thing as a soft foul as in if you're a referee and someone two foots a c**t and sends them 2 metres in the air that's more of an obvious foul than someone slightly knicking into someone's trailing leg. So it wasn't a yellow card? Edited September 4, 2023 by willywastecoat 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lofarl Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 Old Uncle Albert in the bottom row not happy with events. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 57 minutes ago, RuMoore said: If we want to be pedantic there's definitely such thing as a soft foul as in if you're a referee and someone two foots a c**t and sends them 2 metres in the air that's more of an obvious foul than someone slightly knicking into someone's trailing leg. There is no grading a foul. If you break someone's leg in two places, it's a foul. If you grab somebody's shirt, it's a foul. The punishment will be different, but they're both fouls. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 2 minutes ago, kingjoey said: There is no grading a foul. If you break someone's leg in two places, it's a foul. If you grab somebody's shirt, it's a foul. The punishment will be different, but they're both fouls. Yes, but some fouls are more clear cut and self evident than others. Arguing otherwise is a bit daft. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuMoore Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 (edited) 17 minutes ago, kingjoey said: There is no grading a foul. If you break someone's leg in two places, it's a foul. If you grab somebody's shirt, it's a foul. The punishment will be different, but they're both fouls. 13 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: Yes, but some fouls are more clear cut and self evident than others. Arguing otherwise is a bit daft. As MT says.. I'm not arguing that and nobody else is. A soft decision in this case is fair imo whether it was ultimately wrong or not. If Dessers had 2 footed the celtc CB this wouldn't be a talking point. I've already said our shite display isn't covered by this decision, we didn't deserve to win or draw no matter how that decision went but let's not pretend it's not relatively contentious therefore a talking point. Edited September 4, 2023 by RuMoore 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.