Part of the reason players are being played out of position is the manager's "favourite" formation of 3-4-1-2, which he introduced as soon as he was appointed.
That formation certainly worked well for us last year, with an obvious improvement being two strikers, which better suited the forwards we had.
I like the formation generally, but it means we aren't playing with pure full backs, so something has to give regarding where the likes of Taggs plays. If we are playing that formation, then I'd rather Taggs was on the right hand side of the four, with Kev the one or one of the two. Which is effectively what Waspie is saying.
We can switch to four at the back when required, as we have done, and then Taggs slots in to his best position. The lack of a good defensive left back then becomes more of an issue.
Having said that, I'd rather see us sending what money is left in the budget on a quality attacker (or attackers). Will be interesting to see who we do bring in on loan.