I thought you were meant to be the grammar police ffs.
Fair play for recognising Rangers' less than altruistic motives.
The interfering with the ballot bit is a complete red herring. There's nothing in the articles to suggest that ballots need to be secret. Directors are allowed, some would say obliged, to try to persuade members to back their proposals.
"Unnecessarily hasty" or "decisive strong leadership"? Meh, subjective non point.
Is it "known" that the spfl misled clubs about access to funds? That does sound quite serious. I must be behind on this because i missed this development.
If it's known though, why do we need an inquiry?
Don't get me wrong, the SPFL is a shambles, but grandstanding for the morons is not the way to make it less of a shambles.