Dons_1988

Not sure we have the luxury to rest anyone. Not winning here would be very damaging. Hope we start with intensity and try and shock St Mirren but can't see it. 1-0 or 1-1.

You are right, as it was a few days after we'd beaten Copenhagen 4-0. What a week. If the rules don't count incidents pre 2010 then I'll accept his inclusion.

Autocorrect can f**k off.

Love the anger coming through here. Agree with the vast majority. Slightly harsh on Chris Clark, he memorably sent Alan Hutton about 4 rows up the South Stand once. Grounds for exclusion from this list for me. I'd replace him with Gregg Wylde. Arrogant wee *** c**t...who was shite. ETA - Scott Brown seemed a likeable guy but I fucking hate him. I regularly find myself thinking what we might have achieved with a competent keeper during that time.

I couldn’t make it either but she’d seven are brilliant.

Sounds more like a salary tbf

Who are these other clubs they’re compared to? My guess is lazio.

Hahah

He is right though, and your response of ‘aye but you support rangers’ doesn’t exactly do you much favours either.

Cue some hilarious jokes about "the AFC way"

Another thrilling week to come in the title race. So many questions.. Will there be enough injury time played for Celtic to score their 5th or 6th goal? Will Celtic be given a penalty? Or more importantly, how will it compare to the number given at Ibrox? Will Ross County have the temerity to score? Goal difference matters lads, please play fair. One certainty is that this season has been nothing short of a rollercoaster already and we haven't even reached December.

Excellent Rude

f**k me. This is our match thread to come next week to.

This is definitely something limited to the SNP.

Fine, well I will back away from the mindset comment, but stick by my right to call out the specific claim as nonsense.

To be fair our dog farts and when she does they are absolute stinkers.

What a fucking killjoy

Loads of people make spurious claims such as that on social media, I don't see why it can't be challenged. The comparison is ridiculous.

I think you’re spot on in your attitude. Most extremists that gain power take genuine grievances, paint themselves as the individual to solve them, distort the responsible parties for the issue and it grows arms and legs from there.

It didn't go very well for Nicola Sturgeon. I don't like Neil's style but he will treat the other leaders exactly the same, it's how he interviews everyone. He made some fair points/asked fair and relevant questions but think half an hour simply isn't enough time to address some meaty issues, plus he really does talk over people's answers which is unhelpful. I think he treats it like an argument he's trying to win as opposed to just getting information from people. As I say, that isn't anything personal towards Sturgeon, it's just what he does. I would be interested to hear the long form answers to some of those questions.

He didn’t go into detail but he criticised language used in a press conference on Friday (McPhee) and last Monday (I interpreted as grant). I thought he was referring to grant as the two interviews were comparable. McPhee was talking about the difference between lies and errors being malice which is basically what the whole grant interview was about. Also I think the Michael O’Neill intervention was 2 weeks ago.

There’s a common denominator in both those arguments...

An extended argument over a kit going on sale. Greatest rivalry in the world.

I think with regards to last Monday, English was referring to peter grant?

Hoping tree house c**t sticks tbh