Bigbri Posted September 30, 2015 Share Posted September 30, 2015 League Cup is just slightly less diddysome than the Petrified Cup. You don't get into the Champions League even if you win it. Now the Development League - that's true kudos 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC55 FFC Posted October 4, 2015 Share Posted October 4, 2015 Hearing through the grapevine that some new news/progress is being made with the proposed "East stand" development. Anyone know anything concrete? Pardon the pun. Sent from my iPhone using Pie & Bovril 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 So does one F just not exist any more? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbornbairn Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 So does one F just not exist any more? It never did, just a rumour of a myth wrapped in a fable imagined in drink-fuelled nightmares. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranaldo Bairn Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 Or, more prosaically, its moved to onef.co.uk 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbornbairn Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 "Less" prosaically shurely man! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ranaldo Bairn Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 No, I'm happy with more. i.e. it's a humdrum explanation, nothing dramatic has happened. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigbri Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 No it's still totally fecked. Probably that lazy lazy lazy Houstons fault 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbornbairn Posted October 5, 2015 Share Posted October 5, 2015 No, it's still there. Currently moaning about the prospect of a fourth stand. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonBairn Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 Houston and Maybury served with notices of complaint from the SFA in the aftermath of Saturday's game With regards to the FTV interview, was it a club decision to put the fully interview with Housty out in the public domain as such? Fair enough the media would have got a hold of the interview somehow but it was made easy for the world to see 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bejazz1 Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 (edited) I think it was the heat of the moment reaction to come so close only to lose late on in the game. I've seen the incident and I can see it from both sides. If it happened up the other end of the park I'm sure we'd have all be screaming for a free kick. Some you win some you lose. Great to see Houston show a bit of rage and passion, something that disappeared after cardboard cut out Gary Holt left the building We need to see more fire and commitment like that on a regular basis. I suppose it shows how much he cares, I know one or two of our fans were questioning his commitment. Well done Peter Houston!!! Edited October 6, 2015 by bejazz1 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShaggerG Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 I think it was the heat of the moment reaction to come so close only to lose late on in the game. I've seen the incident and I can see it from both sides. If it happened up the other end of the park I'm sure we'd have all be screaming for a free kick. Some you win some you lose. Great to see Houston show a bit of rage and passion, something that disappeared after cardboard cut out Gary Holt left the building We need to see more fire and commitment like that on a regular basis. I suppose it shows how much he cares, I know one or two of our fans were questioning his commitment. Well done Peter Houston!!! The difference being that we wouldn't have got it! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deeboy Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 It is a stonewall free kick everyday of the week. Taiwo doesn't win the ball, Law kicks it off of him. Did Houston say he'd watched it again before his outburst? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 Taiwo doesn't win the ball, Law kicks it off of him. You could say that about the vast majority of tackles in football. Taiwo touched the ball before Law, not a free kick IMO. Can see why it was given in real time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deeboy Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 How can Taiwo touch the ball before Law if Law was trying to meg him and has happened to kick it off of him? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted October 6, 2015 Share Posted October 6, 2015 How can Taiwo touch the ball before Law if Law was trying to meg him and has happened to kick it off of him? Because the ball touches Taiwos left foot, before Taiwos right leg touches Law. So by that logic then, if a defender is standing still with his leg out, and the attacker runs towards him, kicks the ball off his foot, before then running into the player and going down, would that be a free kick as well? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz FFC Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 We know Rangers fans are thick. Dundee are sympathisers of Rangers. Just listen to their songbook. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshmallo Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 Can you two not have your big team argument on a different thread? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 It is a stonewall free kick everyday of the week. Taiwo doesn't win the ball, Law kicks it off of him. Did Houston say he'd watched it again before his outburst? #WDC last night Deeboy? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deeboy Posted October 7, 2015 Share Posted October 7, 2015 Because the ball touches Taiwos left foot, before Taiwos right leg touches Law. That's still not Taiwo winning the ball. That's Taiwo touching the ball. Do we now not give free kicks if a player inadvertently touches the ball before taking the player out? Never mind the whole debate about Law being past Taiwo afterwards, let's sort the 'he touched the ball, therefor no foul' shite you're coming away with. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.